doc-src/TutorialI/Types/types.tex
author nipkow
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 18:24:33 +0200
changeset 10328 bf33cbd76c05
parent 10305 adff80268127
child 10329 a9898d89a634
permissions -rw-r--r--
*** empty log message ***
nipkow@10305
     1
\chapter{More about Types}
nipkow@10305
     2
nipkow@10305
     3
So far we have learned about a few basic types (for example \isa{bool} and
nipkow@10305
     4
\isa{nat}), type abbreviations (\isacommand{types}) and recursive datatpes
nipkow@10305
     5
(\isacommand{datatype}). This chapter will introduce the following more
nipkow@10305
     6
advanced material:
nipkow@10305
     7
\begin{itemize}
nipkow@10305
     8
\item More about basic types: numbers ({\S}\ref{sec:numbers}), pairs
nipkow@10305
     9
  ({\S}\ref{sec:products}) and records ({\S}\ref{sec:records}), and how to reason
nipkow@10305
    10
  about them.
nipkow@10305
    11
\item Introducing your own types: how to introduce your own new types that
nipkow@10305
    12
  cannot be constructed with any of the basic methods ({\S}\ref{sec:typedef}).
nipkow@10305
    13
\item Type classes: how to specify and reason about axiomatic collections of
nipkow@10305
    14
  types ({\S}\ref{sec:axclass}).
nipkow@10305
    15
\end{itemize}
nipkow@10305
    16
nipkow@10305
    17
\section{Axiomatic type classes}
nipkow@10305
    18
\label{sec:axclass}
nipkow@10305
    19
\index{axiomatic type class|(}
nipkow@10305
    20
\index{*axclass|(}
nipkow@10305
    21
nipkow@10305
    22
nipkow@10305
    23
The programming language Haskell has popularized the notion of type classes.
nipkow@10305
    24
Isabelle offers the related concept of an \textbf{axiomatic type class}.
nipkow@10305
    25
Roughly speaking, an axiomatic type class is a type class with axioms, i.e.\ 
nipkow@10305
    26
an axiomatic specification of a class of types. Thus we can talk about a type
nipkow@10305
    27
$t$ being in a class $c$, which is written $\tau :: c$.  This is the case of
nipkow@10305
    28
$\tau$ satisfies the axioms of $c$. Furthermore, type classes can be
nipkow@10305
    29
organized in a hierarchy. Thus there is the notion of a class $d$ being a
nipkow@10305
    30
\textbf{subclass} of a class $c$, written $d < c$. This is the case if all
nipkow@10305
    31
axioms of $c$ are also provable in $d$. Let us now introduce these concepts
nipkow@10305
    32
by means of a running example, ordering relations.
nipkow@10305
    33
nipkow@10305
    34
\subsection{Overloading}
nipkow@10305
    35
\label{sec:overloading}
nipkow@10305
    36
\index{overloading|(}
nipkow@10305
    37
nipkow@10305
    38
\input{Types/document/Overloading0}
nipkow@10305
    39
\input{Types/document/Overloading1}
nipkow@10305
    40
\input{Types/document/Overloading}
nipkow@10305
    41
\input{Types/document/Overloading2}
nipkow@10305
    42
nipkow@10305
    43
\index{overloading|)}
nipkow@10305
    44
nipkow@10328
    45
\input{Types/document/Axioms}
nipkow@10305
    46
nipkow@10305
    47
\index{axiomatic type class|)}
nipkow@10305
    48
\index{*axclass|)}