theory Comp_Rev

imports Compiler

begin

section {* Compiler Correctness, 2nd direction *}

subsection {* Definitions *}

text {* Execution in @{term n} steps for simpler induction *}

primrec 

  exec_n :: "instr list \<Rightarrow> config \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> config \<Rightarrow> bool" 

  ("_/ \<turnstile> (_ \<rightarrow>^_/ _)" [65,0,1000,55] 55)

where 

  "P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^0 c' = (c'=c)" |

  "P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^(Suc n) c'' = (\<exists>c'. (P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow> c') \<and> P \<turnstile> c' \<rightarrow>^n c'')"

text {* The possible successor pc's of an instruction at position @{term n} *}

definition

  "isuccs i n \<equiv> case i of 

     JMP j \<Rightarrow> {n + 1 + j}

   | JMPFLESS j \<Rightarrow> {n + 1 + j, n + 1}

   | JMPFGE j \<Rightarrow> {n + 1 + j, n + 1}

   | _ \<Rightarrow> {n +1}"

(* FIXME: _Collect? *)

text {* The possible successors pc's of an instruction list *}

definition

  "succs P n = {s. \<exists>i. 0 \<le> i \<and> i < isize P \<and> s \<in> isuccs (P!!i) (n+i)}" 

text {* Possible exit pc's of a program *}

definition

  "exits P = succs P 0 - {0..< isize P}"

subsection {* Basic properties of @{term exec_n} *}

lemma exec_n_exec:

  "P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^n c' \<Longrightarrow> P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>* c'"

  by (induct n arbitrary: c)  (auto intro: exec.step)

lemma exec_0 [intro!]: "P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^0 c" by simp

lemma exec_Suc [trans]:

  "\<lbrakk> P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow> c'; P \<turnstile> c' \<rightarrow>^n c'' \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^(Suc n) c''" 

  by (fastsimp simp del: split_paired_Ex)

lemma exec_exec_n:

  "P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>* c' \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>n. P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^n c'"

  by (induct rule: exec.induct) (auto intro: exec_Suc)

lemma exec_eq_exec_n:

  "(P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>* c') = (\<exists>n. P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^n c')"

  by (blast intro: exec_exec_n exec_n_exec)

lemma exec_n_Nil [simp]:

  "[] \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^k c' = (c' = c \<and> k = 0)"

  by (induct k) auto

lemma exec1_exec_n [elim,intro!]:

  "P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow> c' \<Longrightarrow> P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^1 c'"

  by (cases c') simp

subsection {* Concrete symbolic execution steps *}

lemma exec_n_step:

  "n \<noteq> n' \<Longrightarrow> 

  P \<turnstile> (n,stk,s) \<rightarrow>^k (n',stk',s') = 

  (\<exists>c. P \<turnstile> (n,stk,s) \<rightarrow> c \<and> P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow>^(k - 1) (n',stk',s') \<and> 0 < k)"

  by (cases k) auto

lemma exec1_end:

  "isize P <= fst c \<Longrightarrow> \<not> P \<turnstile> c \<rightarrow> c'"

  by auto

lemma exec_n_end:

  "isize P <= n \<Longrightarrow> 

  P \<turnstile> (n,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^k (n',s',stk') = (n' = n \<and> stk'=stk \<and> s'=s \<and> k =0)"

  by (cases k) (auto simp: exec1_end)

lemmas exec_n_simps = exec_n_step exec_n_end

subsection {* Basic properties of @{term succs} *}

lemma succs_simps [simp]: 

  "succs [ADD] n = {n + 1}"

  "succs [LOADI v] n = {n + 1}"

  "succs [LOAD x] n = {n + 1}"

  "succs [STORE x] n = {n + 1}"

  "succs [JMP i] n = {n + 1 + i}"

  "succs [JMPFGE i] n = {n + 1 + i, n + 1}"

  "succs [JMPFLESS i] n = {n + 1 + i, n + 1}"

  by (auto simp: succs_def isuccs_def)

lemma succs_empty [iff]: "succs [] n = {}"

  by (simp add: succs_def)

lemma succs_Cons:

  "succs (x#xs) n = isuccs x n \<union> succs xs (1+n)" (is "_ = ?x \<union> ?xs")

proof 

  let ?isuccs = "\<lambda>p P n i. 0 \<le> i \<and> i < isize P \<and> p \<in> isuccs (P!!i) (n+i)"

  { fix p assume "p \<in> succs (x#xs) n"

    then obtain i where isuccs: "?isuccs p (x#xs) n i"

      unfolding succs_def by auto     

    have "p \<in> ?x \<union> ?xs" 

    proof cases

      assume "i = 0" with isuccs show ?thesis by simp

    next

      assume "i \<noteq> 0" 

      with isuccs 

      have "?isuccs p xs (1+n) (i - 1)" by auto

      hence "p \<in> ?xs" unfolding succs_def by blast

      thus ?thesis .. 

    qed

  } 

  thus "succs (x#xs) n \<subseteq> ?x \<union> ?xs" ..

  { fix p assume "p \<in> ?x \<or> p \<in> ?xs"

    hence "p \<in> succs (x#xs) n"

    proof

      assume "p \<in> ?x" thus ?thesis by (fastsimp simp: succs_def)

    next

      assume "p \<in> ?xs"

      then obtain i where "?isuccs p xs (1+n) i"

        unfolding succs_def by auto

      hence "?isuccs p (x#xs) n (1+i)"

        by (simp add: algebra_simps)

      thus ?thesis unfolding succs_def by blast

    qed

  }  

  thus "?x \<union> ?xs \<subseteq> succs (x#xs) n" by blast

qed

lemma succs_iexec1:

  "\<lbrakk> P!!i \<turnstile>i (i,s,stk) \<rightarrow> c'; 0 \<le> i; i < isize P \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> fst c' \<in> succs P 0"

  by (auto elim!: iexec1.cases simp: succs_def isuccs_def)

lemma succs_shift:

  "(p - n \<in> succs P 0) = (p \<in> succs P n)" 

  by (fastsimp simp: succs_def isuccs_def split: instr.split)

lemma inj_op_plus [simp]:

  "inj (op + (i::int))"

  by (metis add_minus_cancel inj_on_inverseI)

lemma succs_set_shift [simp]:

  "op + i ` succs xs 0 = succs xs i"

  by (force simp: succs_shift [where n=i, symmetric] intro: set_eqI)

lemma succs_append [simp]:

  "succs (xs @ ys) n = succs xs n \<union> succs ys (n + isize xs)"

  by (induct xs arbitrary: n) (auto simp: succs_Cons algebra_simps)

lemma exits_append [simp]:

  "exits (xs @ ys) = exits xs \<union> (op + (isize xs)) ` exits ys - 

                     {0..<isize xs + isize ys}" 

  by (auto simp: exits_def image_set_diff)

lemma exits_single:

  "exits [x] = isuccs x 0 - {0}"

  by (auto simp: exits_def succs_def)

lemma exits_Cons:

  "exits (x # xs) = (isuccs x 0 - {0}) \<union> (op + 1) ` exits xs - 

                     {0..<1 + isize xs}" 

  using exits_append [of "[x]" xs]

  by (simp add: exits_single)

lemma exits_empty [iff]: "exits [] = {}" by (simp add: exits_def)

lemma exits_simps [simp]:

  "exits [ADD] = {1}"

  "exits [LOADI v] = {1}"

  "exits [LOAD x] = {1}"

  "exits [STORE x] = {1}"

  "i \<noteq> -1 \<Longrightarrow> exits [JMP i] = {1 + i}"

  "i \<noteq> -1 \<Longrightarrow> exits [JMPFGE i] = {1 + i, 1}"

  "i \<noteq> -1 \<Longrightarrow> exits [JMPFLESS i] = {1 + i, 1}"

  by (auto simp: exits_def)

lemma acomp_succs [simp]:

  "succs (acomp a) n = {n + 1 .. n + isize (acomp a)}"

  by (induct a arbitrary: n) auto

lemma acomp_size:

  "1 \<le> isize (acomp a)"

  by (induct a) auto

lemma exits_acomp [simp]:

  "exits (acomp a) = {isize (acomp a)}"

  by (auto simp: exits_def acomp_size)

lemma bcomp_succs:

  "0 \<le> i \<Longrightarrow>

  succs (bcomp b c i) n \<subseteq> {n .. n + isize (bcomp b c i)}

                           \<union> {n + i + isize (bcomp b c i)}" 

proof (induct b arbitrary: c i n)

  case (And b1 b2)

  from And.prems

  show ?case 

    by (cases c)

       (auto dest: And.hyps(1) [THEN subsetD, rotated] 

                   And.hyps(2) [THEN subsetD, rotated])

qed auto

lemmas bcomp_succsD [dest!] = bcomp_succs [THEN subsetD, rotated]

lemma bcomp_exits:

  "0 \<le> i \<Longrightarrow>

  exits (bcomp b c i) \<subseteq> {isize (bcomp b c i), i + isize (bcomp b c i)}" 

  by (auto simp: exits_def)

lemma bcomp_exitsD [dest!]:

  "p \<in> exits (bcomp b c i) \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> i \<Longrightarrow> 

  p = isize (bcomp b c i) \<or> p = i + isize (bcomp b c i)"

  using bcomp_exits by auto

lemma ccomp_succs:

  "succs (ccomp c) n \<subseteq> {n..n + isize (ccomp c)}"

proof (induct c arbitrary: n)

  case SKIP thus ?case by simp

next

  case Assign thus ?case by simp

next

  case (Semi c1 c2)

  from Semi.prems

  show ?case 

    by (fastsimp dest: Semi.hyps [THEN subsetD])

next

  case (If b c1 c2)

  from If.prems

  show ?case

    by (auto dest!: If.hyps [THEN subsetD] simp: isuccs_def succs_Cons)

next

  case (While b c)

  from While.prems

  show ?case by (auto dest!: While.hyps [THEN subsetD])

qed

lemma ccomp_exits:

  "exits (ccomp c) \<subseteq> {isize (ccomp c)}"

  using ccomp_succs [of c 0] by (auto simp: exits_def)

lemma ccomp_exitsD [dest!]:

  "p \<in> exits (ccomp c) \<Longrightarrow> p = isize (ccomp c)"

  using ccomp_exits by auto

subsection {* Splitting up machine executions *}

lemma exec1_split:

  "P @ c @ P' \<turnstile> (isize P + i, s) \<rightarrow> (j,s') \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> i \<Longrightarrow> i < isize c \<Longrightarrow> 

  c \<turnstile> (i,s) \<rightarrow> (j - isize P, s')"

  by (auto elim!: iexec1.cases)

lemma exec_n_split:

  shows "\<lbrakk> P @ c @ P' \<turnstile> (isize P + i, s) \<rightarrow>^n (j, s');

           0 \<le> i; i < isize c; j \<notin> {isize P ..< isize P + isize c} \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>

         \<exists>s'' i' k m. 

                   c \<turnstile> (i, s) \<rightarrow>^k (i', s'') \<and>

                   i' \<in> exits c \<and> 

                   P @ c @ P' \<turnstile> (isize P + i', s'') \<rightarrow>^m (j, s') \<and>

                   n = k + m" 

proof (induct n arbitrary: i j s)

  case 0

  thus ?case by simp

next

  case (Suc n)

  have i: "0 \<le> i" "i < isize c" by fact+

  from Suc.prems

  have j: "\<not> (isize P \<le> j \<and> j < isize P + isize c)" by simp

  from Suc.prems 

  obtain i0 s0 where

    step: "P @ c @ P' \<turnstile> (isize P + i, s) \<rightarrow> (i0,s0)" and

    rest: "P @ c @ P' \<turnstile> (i0,s0) \<rightarrow>^n (j, s')"

    by clarsimp

  from step i

  have c: "c \<turnstile> (i,s) \<rightarrow> (i0 - isize P, s0)" by (rule exec1_split)

  have "i0 = isize P + (i0 - isize P) " by simp

  then obtain j0 where j0: "i0 = isize P + j0"  ..

  note split_paired_Ex [simp del]

  { assume "j0 \<in> {0 ..< isize c}"

    with j0 j rest c

    have ?case

      by (fastsimp dest!: Suc.hyps intro!: exec_Suc)

  } moreover {

    assume "j0 \<notin> {0 ..< isize c}"

    moreover

    from c j0 have "j0 \<in> succs c 0"

      by (auto dest: succs_iexec1)

    ultimately

    have "j0 \<in> exits c" by (simp add: exits_def)

    with c j0 rest

    have ?case by fastsimp

  }

  ultimately

  show ?case by cases

qed

lemma exec_n_drop_right:

  shows "\<lbrakk> c @ P' \<turnstile> (0, s) \<rightarrow>^n (j, s'); j \<notin> {0..<isize c} \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>

         \<exists>s'' i' k m. 

                   (if c = [] then s'' = s \<and> i' = 0 \<and> k = 0

                   else

                   c \<turnstile> (0, s) \<rightarrow>^k (i', s'') \<and>

                   i' \<in> exits c) \<and> 

                   c @ P' \<turnstile> (i', s'') \<rightarrow>^m (j, s') \<and>

                   n = k + m"

  by (cases "c = []")

     (auto dest: exec_n_split [where P="[]", simplified])

text {*

  Dropping the left context of a potentially incomplete execution of @{term c}.

*}

lemma exec1_drop_left:

  assumes "P1 @ P2 \<turnstile> (i, s, stk) \<rightarrow> (n, s', stk')" and "isize P1 \<le> i"

  shows "P2 \<turnstile> (i - isize P1, s, stk) \<rightarrow> (n - isize P1, s', stk')"

proof -

  have "i = isize P1 + (i - isize P1)" by simp 

  then obtain i' where "i = isize P1 + i'" ..

  moreover

  have "n = isize P1 + (n - isize P1)" by simp 

  then obtain n' where "n = isize P1 + n'" ..

  ultimately 

  show ?thesis using assms by clarsimp

qed

lemma exec_n_drop_left:

  "\<lbrakk> P @ P' \<turnstile> (i, s, stk) \<rightarrow>^k (n, s', stk'); 

     isize P \<le> i; exits P' \<subseteq> {0..} \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>

     P' \<turnstile> (i - isize P, s, stk) \<rightarrow>^k (n - isize P, s', stk')"

proof (induct k arbitrary: i s stk)

  case 0 thus ?case by simp

next

  case (Suc k)

  from Suc.prems

  obtain i' s'' stk'' where

    step: "P @ P' \<turnstile> (i, s, stk) \<rightarrow> (i', s'', stk'')" and

    rest: "P @ P' \<turnstile> (i', s'', stk'') \<rightarrow>^k (n, s', stk')"

    by auto

  from step `isize P \<le> i`

  have "P' \<turnstile> (i - isize P, s, stk) \<rightarrow> (i' - isize P, s'', stk'')" 

    by (rule exec1_drop_left)

  also

  then have "i' - isize P \<in> succs P' 0"

    by (fastsimp dest!: succs_iexec1)

  with `exits P' \<subseteq> {0..}`

  have "isize P \<le> i'" by (auto simp: exits_def)

  from rest this `exits P' \<subseteq> {0..}`     

  have "P' \<turnstile> (i' - isize P, s'', stk'') \<rightarrow>^k (n - isize P, s', stk')"

    by (rule Suc.hyps)

  finally

  show ?case .

qed

lemmas exec_n_drop_Cons = 

  exec_n_drop_left [where P="[instr]", simplified, standard]

definition

  "closed P \<longleftrightarrow> exits P \<subseteq> {isize P}" 

lemma ccomp_closed [simp, intro!]: "closed (ccomp c)"

  using ccomp_exits by (auto simp: closed_def)

lemma acomp_closed [simp, intro!]: "closed (acomp c)"

  by (simp add: closed_def)

lemma exec_n_split_full:

  assumes exec: "P @ P' \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^k (j, s', stk')"

  assumes P: "isize P \<le> j" 

  assumes closed: "closed P"

  assumes exits: "exits P' \<subseteq> {0..}"

  shows "\<exists>k1 k2 s'' stk''. P \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^k1 (isize P, s'', stk'') \<and> 

                           P' \<turnstile> (0,s'',stk'') \<rightarrow>^k2 (j - isize P, s', stk')"

proof (cases "P")

  case Nil with exec

  show ?thesis by fastsimp

next

  case Cons

  hence "0 < isize P" by simp

  with exec P closed

  obtain k1 k2 s'' stk'' where

    1: "P \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^k1 (isize P, s'', stk'')" and

    2: "P @ P' \<turnstile> (isize P,s'',stk'') \<rightarrow>^k2 (j, s', stk')"

    by (auto dest!: exec_n_split [where P="[]" and i=0, simplified] 

             simp: closed_def)

  moreover

  have "j = isize P + (j - isize P)" by simp

  then obtain j0 where "j = isize P + j0" ..

  ultimately

  show ?thesis using exits

    by (fastsimp dest: exec_n_drop_left)

qed

subsection {* Correctness theorem *}

lemma acomp_neq_Nil [simp]:

  "acomp a \<noteq> []"

  by (induct a) auto

lemma acomp_exec_n [dest!]:

  "acomp a \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^n (isize (acomp a),s',stk') \<Longrightarrow> 

  s' = s \<and> stk' = aval a s#stk"

proof (induct a arbitrary: n s' stk stk')

  case (Plus a1 a2)

  let ?sz = "isize (acomp a1) + (isize (acomp a2) + 1)"

  from Plus.prems

  have "acomp a1 @ acomp a2 @ [ADD] \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^n (?sz, s', stk')" 

    by (simp add: algebra_simps)

  then obtain n1 s1 stk1 n2 s2 stk2 n3 where 

    "acomp a1 \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^n1 (isize (acomp a1), s1, stk1)"

    "acomp a2 \<turnstile> (0,s1,stk1) \<rightarrow>^n2 (isize (acomp a2), s2, stk2)" 

       "[ADD] \<turnstile> (0,s2,stk2) \<rightarrow>^n3 (1, s', stk')"

    by (auto dest!: exec_n_split_full)

  thus ?case by (fastsimp dest: Plus.hyps simp: exec_n_simps)

qed (auto simp: exec_n_simps)

lemma bcomp_split:

  shows "\<lbrakk> bcomp b c i @ P' \<turnstile> (0, s, stk) \<rightarrow>^n (j, s', stk'); 

           j \<notin> {0..<isize (bcomp b c i)}; 0 \<le> i \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>

         \<exists>s'' stk'' i' k m. 

           bcomp b c i \<turnstile> (0, s, stk) \<rightarrow>^k (i', s'', stk'') \<and>

           (i' = isize (bcomp b c i) \<or> i' = i + isize (bcomp b c i)) \<and>

           bcomp b c i @ P' \<turnstile> (i', s'', stk'') \<rightarrow>^m (j, s', stk') \<and>

           n = k + m"

  by (cases "bcomp b c i = []")

     (fastsimp dest!: exec_n_drop_right)+

lemma bcomp_exec_n [dest]:

  "\<lbrakk> bcomp b c j \<turnstile> (0, s, stk) \<rightarrow>^n (i, s', stk');

     isize (bcomp b c j) \<le> i; 0 \<le> j \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>

  i = isize(bcomp b c j) + (if c = bval b s then j else 0) \<and>

  s' = s \<and> stk' = stk"

proof (induct b arbitrary: c j i n s' stk')

  case B thus ?case 

    by (simp split: split_if_asm add: exec_n_simps)

next

  case (Not b) 

  from Not.prems show ?case

    by (fastsimp dest!: Not.hyps) 

next

  case (And b1 b2)

  let ?b2 = "bcomp b2 c j" 

  let ?m  = "if c then isize ?b2 else isize ?b2 + j"

  let ?b1 = "bcomp b1 False ?m" 

  have j: "isize (bcomp (And b1 b2) c j) \<le> i" "0 \<le> j" by fact+

  from And.prems

  obtain s'' stk'' i' k m where 

    b1: "?b1 \<turnstile> (0, s, stk) \<rightarrow>^k (i', s'', stk'')"

        "i' = isize ?b1 \<or> i' = ?m + isize ?b1" and

    b2: "?b2 \<turnstile> (i' - isize ?b1, s'', stk'') \<rightarrow>^m (i - isize ?b1, s', stk')"

    by (auto dest!: bcomp_split dest: exec_n_drop_left)

  from b1 j

  have "i' = isize ?b1 + (if \<not>bval b1 s then ?m else 0) \<and> s'' = s \<and> stk'' = stk"

    by (auto dest!: And.hyps)

  with b2 j

  show ?case 

    by (fastsimp dest!: And.hyps simp: exec_n_end split: split_if_asm)

next

  case Less

  thus ?case by (auto dest!: exec_n_split_full simp: exec_n_simps) (* takes time *) 

qed

lemma ccomp_empty [elim!]:

  "ccomp c = [] \<Longrightarrow> (c,s) \<Rightarrow> s"

  by (induct c) auto

lemma assign [simp]:

  "(x ::= a,s) \<Rightarrow> s' \<longleftrightarrow> (s' = s(x := aval a s))"

  by auto

lemma ccomp_exec_n:

  "ccomp c \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^n (isize(ccomp c),t,stk')

  \<Longrightarrow> (c,s) \<Rightarrow> t \<and> stk'=stk"

proof (induct c arbitrary: s t stk stk' n)

  case SKIP

  thus ?case by auto

next

  case (Assign x a)

  thus ?case

    by simp (fastsimp dest!: exec_n_split_full simp: exec_n_simps)

next

  case (Semi c1 c2)

  thus ?case by (fastsimp dest!: exec_n_split_full)

next

  case (If b c1 c2)

  note If.hyps [dest!]

  let ?if = "IF b THEN c1 ELSE c2"

  let ?cs = "ccomp ?if"

  let ?bcomp = "bcomp b False (isize (ccomp c1) + 1)"

  from `?cs \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^n (isize ?cs,t,stk')`

  obtain i' k m s'' stk'' where

    cs: "?cs \<turnstile> (i',s'',stk'') \<rightarrow>^m (isize ?cs,t,stk')" and

        "?bcomp \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^k (i', s'', stk'')" 

        "i' = isize ?bcomp \<or> i' = isize ?bcomp + isize (ccomp c1) + 1"

    by (auto dest!: bcomp_split)

  hence i':

    "s''=s" "stk'' = stk" 

    "i' = (if bval b s then isize ?bcomp else isize ?bcomp+isize(ccomp c1)+1)"

    by auto

  with cs have cs':

    "ccomp c1@JMP (isize (ccomp c2))#ccomp c2 \<turnstile> 

       (if bval b s then 0 else isize (ccomp c1)+1, s, stk) \<rightarrow>^m

       (1 + isize (ccomp c1) + isize (ccomp c2), t, stk')"

    by (fastsimp dest: exec_n_drop_left simp: exits_Cons isuccs_def algebra_simps)

  show ?case

  proof (cases "bval b s")

    case True with cs'

    show ?thesis

      by simp

         (fastsimp dest: exec_n_drop_right 

                   split: split_if_asm simp: exec_n_simps)

  next

    case False with cs'

    show ?thesis

      by (auto dest!: exec_n_drop_Cons exec_n_drop_left 

               simp: exits_Cons isuccs_def)

  qed

next

  case (While b c)

  from While.prems

  show ?case

  proof (induct n arbitrary: s rule: nat_less_induct)

    case (1 n)

    { assume "\<not> bval b s"

      with "1.prems"

      have ?case

        by simp

           (fastsimp dest!: bcomp_exec_n bcomp_split 

                     simp: exec_n_simps)

    } moreover {

      assume b: "bval b s"

      let ?c0 = "WHILE b DO c"

      let ?cs = "ccomp ?c0"

      let ?bs = "bcomp b False (isize (ccomp c) + 1)"

      let ?jmp = "[JMPB (isize ?bs + isize (ccomp c) + 1)]"

      from "1.prems" b

      obtain k where

        cs: "?cs \<turnstile> (isize ?bs, s, stk) \<rightarrow>^k (isize ?cs, t, stk')" and

        k:  "k \<le> n"

        by (fastsimp dest!: bcomp_split)

      have ?case

      proof cases

        assume "ccomp c = []"

        with cs k

        obtain m where

          "?cs \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>^m (isize (ccomp ?c0), t, stk')"

          "m < n"

          by (auto simp: exec_n_step [where k=k])

        with "1.hyps"

        show ?case by blast

      next

        assume "ccomp c \<noteq> []"

        with cs

        obtain m m' s'' stk'' where

          c: "ccomp c \<turnstile> (0, s, stk) \<rightarrow>^m' (isize (ccomp c), s'', stk'')" and 

          rest: "?cs \<turnstile> (isize ?bs + isize (ccomp c), s'', stk'') \<rightarrow>^m 

                       (isize ?cs, t, stk')" and

          m: "k = m + m'"

          by (auto dest: exec_n_split [where i=0, simplified])

        from c

        have "(c,s) \<Rightarrow> s''" and stk: "stk'' = stk"

          by (auto dest!: While.hyps)

        moreover

        from rest m k stk

        obtain k' where

          "?cs \<turnstile> (0, s'', stk) \<rightarrow>^k' (isize ?cs, t, stk')"

          "k' < n"

          by (auto simp: exec_n_step [where k=m])

        with "1.hyps"

        have "(?c0, s'') \<Rightarrow> t \<and> stk' = stk" by blast

        ultimately

        show ?case using b by blast

      qed

    }

    ultimately show ?case by cases

  qed

qed

theorem ccomp_exec:

  "ccomp c \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>* (isize(ccomp c),t,stk') \<Longrightarrow> (c,s) \<Rightarrow> t"

  by (auto dest: exec_exec_n ccomp_exec_n)

corollary ccomp_sound:

  "ccomp c \<turnstile> (0,s,stk) \<rightarrow>* (isize(ccomp c),t,stk)  \<longleftrightarrow>  (c,s) \<Rightarrow> t"

  by (blast intro!: ccomp_exec ccomp_bigstep)

end