author | paulson |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:54:22 +0200 | |
changeset 11868 | 56db9f3a6b3e |
parent 11701 | 3d51fbf81c17 |
child 13187 | e5434b822a96 |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
wenzelm@11049 | 1 |
(* Title: HOL/NumberTheory/Chinese.thy |
paulson@9508 | 2 |
ID: $Id$ |
wenzelm@11049 | 3 |
Author: Thomas M. Rasmussen |
wenzelm@11049 | 4 |
Copyright 2000 University of Cambridge |
paulson@9508 | 5 |
*) |
paulson@9508 | 6 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 7 |
header {* The Chinese Remainder Theorem *} |
wenzelm@11049 | 8 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 9 |
theory Chinese = IntPrimes: |
wenzelm@11049 | 10 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 11 |
text {* |
wenzelm@11049 | 12 |
The Chinese Remainder Theorem for an arbitrary finite number of |
wenzelm@11049 | 13 |
equations. (The one-equation case is included in theory @{text |
wenzelm@11049 | 14 |
IntPrimes}. Uses functions for indexing.\footnote{Maybe @{term |
wenzelm@11049 | 15 |
funprod} and @{term funsum} should be based on general @{term fold} |
wenzelm@11049 | 16 |
on indices?} |
wenzelm@11049 | 17 |
*} |
wenzelm@11049 | 18 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 19 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 20 |
subsection {* Definitions *} |
paulson@9508 | 21 |
|
paulson@9508 | 22 |
consts |
wenzelm@11049 | 23 |
funprod :: "(nat => int) => nat => nat => int" |
wenzelm@11049 | 24 |
funsum :: "(nat => int) => nat => nat => int" |
paulson@9508 | 25 |
|
paulson@9508 | 26 |
primrec |
wenzelm@11049 | 27 |
"funprod f i 0 = f i" |
wenzelm@11049 | 28 |
"funprod f i (Suc n) = f (Suc (i + n)) * funprod f i n" |
paulson@9508 | 29 |
|
paulson@9508 | 30 |
primrec |
wenzelm@11049 | 31 |
"funsum f i 0 = f i" |
wenzelm@11049 | 32 |
"funsum f i (Suc n) = f (Suc (i + n)) + funsum f i n" |
paulson@9508 | 33 |
|
paulson@9508 | 34 |
consts |
wenzelm@11049 | 35 |
m_cond :: "nat => (nat => int) => bool" |
wenzelm@11049 | 36 |
km_cond :: "nat => (nat => int) => (nat => int) => bool" |
wenzelm@11049 | 37 |
lincong_sol :: |
wenzelm@11049 | 38 |
"nat => (nat => int) => (nat => int) => (nat => int) => int => bool" |
paulson@9508 | 39 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 40 |
mhf :: "(nat => int) => nat => nat => int" |
wenzelm@11049 | 41 |
xilin_sol :: |
wenzelm@11049 | 42 |
"nat => nat => (nat => int) => (nat => int) => (nat => int) => int" |
wenzelm@11049 | 43 |
x_sol :: "nat => (nat => int) => (nat => int) => (nat => int) => int" |
paulson@9508 | 44 |
|
paulson@9508 | 45 |
defs |
wenzelm@11049 | 46 |
m_cond_def: |
wenzelm@11049 | 47 |
"m_cond n mf == |
paulson@11868 | 48 |
(\<forall>i. i \<le> n --> 0 < mf i) \<and> |
paulson@11868 | 49 |
(\<forall>i j. i \<le> n \<and> j \<le> n \<and> i \<noteq> j --> zgcd (mf i, mf j) = 1)" |
paulson@9508 | 50 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 51 |
km_cond_def: |
paulson@11868 | 52 |
"km_cond n kf mf == \<forall>i. i \<le> n --> zgcd (kf i, mf i) = 1" |
paulson@9508 | 53 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 54 |
lincong_sol_def: |
wenzelm@11049 | 55 |
"lincong_sol n kf bf mf x == \<forall>i. i \<le> n --> zcong (kf i * x) (bf i) (mf i)" |
paulson@9508 | 56 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 57 |
mhf_def: |
wenzelm@11049 | 58 |
"mhf mf n i == |
wenzelm@11701 | 59 |
if i = 0 then funprod mf (Suc 0) (n - Suc 0) |
wenzelm@11701 | 60 |
else if i = n then funprod mf 0 (n - Suc 0) |
wenzelm@11701 | 61 |
else funprod mf 0 (i - Suc 0) * funprod mf (Suc i) (n - Suc 0 - i)" |
paulson@9508 | 62 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 63 |
xilin_sol_def: |
wenzelm@11049 | 64 |
"xilin_sol i n kf bf mf == |
wenzelm@11049 | 65 |
if 0 < n \<and> i \<le> n \<and> m_cond n mf \<and> km_cond n kf mf then |
paulson@11868 | 66 |
(SOME x. 0 \<le> x \<and> x < mf i \<and> zcong (kf i * mhf mf n i * x) (bf i) (mf i)) |
paulson@11868 | 67 |
else 0" |
paulson@9508 | 68 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 69 |
x_sol_def: |
wenzelm@11049 | 70 |
"x_sol n kf bf mf == funsum (\<lambda>i. xilin_sol i n kf bf mf * mhf mf n i) 0 n" |
wenzelm@11049 | 71 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 72 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 73 |
text {* \medskip @{term funprod} and @{term funsum} *} |
wenzelm@11049 | 74 |
|
paulson@11868 | 75 |
lemma funprod_pos: "(\<forall>i. i \<le> n --> 0 < mf i) ==> 0 < funprod mf 0 n" |
wenzelm@11049 | 76 |
apply (induct n) |
wenzelm@11049 | 77 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 78 |
apply (simp add: int_0_less_mult_iff) |
wenzelm@11049 | 79 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 80 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 81 |
lemma funprod_zgcd [rule_format (no_asm)]: |
paulson@11868 | 82 |
"(\<forall>i. k \<le> i \<and> i \<le> k + l --> zgcd (mf i, mf m) = 1) --> |
paulson@11868 | 83 |
zgcd (funprod mf k l, mf m) = 1" |
wenzelm@11049 | 84 |
apply (induct l) |
wenzelm@11049 | 85 |
apply simp_all |
wenzelm@11049 | 86 |
apply (rule impI)+ |
wenzelm@11049 | 87 |
apply (subst zgcd_zmult_cancel) |
wenzelm@11049 | 88 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 89 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 90 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 91 |
lemma funprod_zdvd [rule_format]: |
wenzelm@11049 | 92 |
"k \<le> i --> i \<le> k + l --> mf i dvd funprod mf k l" |
wenzelm@11049 | 93 |
apply (induct l) |
wenzelm@11049 | 94 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 95 |
apply (rule_tac [2] zdvd_zmult2) |
wenzelm@11049 | 96 |
apply (rule_tac [3] zdvd_zmult) |
wenzelm@11049 | 97 |
apply (subgoal_tac "i = k") |
wenzelm@11049 | 98 |
apply (subgoal_tac [3] "i = Suc (k + n)") |
wenzelm@11049 | 99 |
apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp)) |
wenzelm@11049 | 100 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 101 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 102 |
lemma funsum_mod: |
wenzelm@11049 | 103 |
"funsum f k l mod m = funsum (\<lambda>i. (f i) mod m) k l mod m" |
wenzelm@11049 | 104 |
apply (induct l) |
wenzelm@11049 | 105 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 106 |
apply (rule trans) |
wenzelm@11049 | 107 |
apply (rule zmod_zadd1_eq) |
wenzelm@11049 | 108 |
apply simp |
wenzelm@11049 | 109 |
apply (rule zmod_zadd_right_eq [symmetric]) |
wenzelm@11049 | 110 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 111 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 112 |
lemma funsum_zero [rule_format (no_asm)]: |
paulson@11868 | 113 |
"(\<forall>i. k \<le> i \<and> i \<le> k + l --> f i = 0) --> (funsum f k l) = 0" |
wenzelm@11049 | 114 |
apply (induct l) |
wenzelm@11049 | 115 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 116 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 117 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 118 |
lemma funsum_oneelem [rule_format (no_asm)]: |
wenzelm@11049 | 119 |
"k \<le> j --> j \<le> k + l --> |
paulson@11868 | 120 |
(\<forall>i. k \<le> i \<and> i \<le> k + l \<and> i \<noteq> j --> f i = 0) --> |
wenzelm@11049 | 121 |
funsum f k l = f j" |
wenzelm@11049 | 122 |
apply (induct l) |
wenzelm@11049 | 123 |
prefer 2 |
wenzelm@11049 | 124 |
apply clarify |
wenzelm@11049 | 125 |
defer |
wenzelm@11049 | 126 |
apply clarify |
wenzelm@11049 | 127 |
apply (subgoal_tac "k = j") |
wenzelm@11049 | 128 |
apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp)) |
wenzelm@11049 | 129 |
apply (case_tac "Suc (k + n) = j") |
paulson@11868 | 130 |
apply (subgoal_tac "funsum f k n = 0") |
wenzelm@11049 | 131 |
apply (rule_tac [2] funsum_zero) |
paulson@11868 | 132 |
apply (subgoal_tac [3] "f (Suc (k + n)) = 0") |
wenzelm@11049 | 133 |
apply (subgoal_tac [3] "j \<le> k + n") |
wenzelm@11049 | 134 |
prefer 4 |
wenzelm@11049 | 135 |
apply arith |
wenzelm@11049 | 136 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 137 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 138 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 139 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 140 |
subsection {* Chinese: uniqueness *} |
wenzelm@11049 | 141 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 142 |
lemma aux: |
wenzelm@11049 | 143 |
"m_cond n mf ==> km_cond n kf mf |
wenzelm@11049 | 144 |
==> lincong_sol n kf bf mf x ==> lincong_sol n kf bf mf y |
wenzelm@11049 | 145 |
==> [x = y] (mod mf n)" |
wenzelm@11049 | 146 |
apply (unfold m_cond_def km_cond_def lincong_sol_def) |
wenzelm@11049 | 147 |
apply (rule iffD1) |
wenzelm@11049 | 148 |
apply (rule_tac k = "kf n" in zcong_cancel2) |
wenzelm@11049 | 149 |
apply (rule_tac [3] b = "bf n" in zcong_trans) |
wenzelm@11049 | 150 |
prefer 4 |
wenzelm@11049 | 151 |
apply (subst zcong_sym) |
wenzelm@11049 | 152 |
defer |
wenzelm@11049 | 153 |
apply (rule order_less_imp_le) |
wenzelm@11049 | 154 |
apply simp_all |
wenzelm@11049 | 155 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 156 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 157 |
lemma zcong_funprod [rule_format]: |
wenzelm@11049 | 158 |
"m_cond n mf --> km_cond n kf mf --> |
wenzelm@11049 | 159 |
lincong_sol n kf bf mf x --> lincong_sol n kf bf mf y --> |
wenzelm@11049 | 160 |
[x = y] (mod funprod mf 0 n)" |
wenzelm@11049 | 161 |
apply (induct n) |
wenzelm@11049 | 162 |
apply (simp_all (no_asm)) |
wenzelm@11049 | 163 |
apply (blast intro: aux) |
wenzelm@11049 | 164 |
apply (rule impI)+ |
wenzelm@11049 | 165 |
apply (rule zcong_zgcd_zmult_zmod) |
wenzelm@11049 | 166 |
apply (blast intro: aux) |
wenzelm@11049 | 167 |
prefer 2 |
wenzelm@11049 | 168 |
apply (subst zgcd_commute) |
wenzelm@11049 | 169 |
apply (rule funprod_zgcd) |
wenzelm@11049 | 170 |
apply (auto simp add: m_cond_def km_cond_def lincong_sol_def) |
wenzelm@11049 | 171 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 172 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 173 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 174 |
subsection {* Chinese: existence *} |
wenzelm@11049 | 175 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 176 |
lemma unique_xi_sol: |
wenzelm@11049 | 177 |
"0 < n ==> i \<le> n ==> m_cond n mf ==> km_cond n kf mf |
paulson@11868 | 178 |
==> \<exists>!x. 0 \<le> x \<and> x < mf i \<and> [kf i * mhf mf n i * x = bf i] (mod mf i)" |
wenzelm@11049 | 179 |
apply (rule zcong_lineq_unique) |
wenzelm@11049 | 180 |
apply (tactic {* stac (thm "zgcd_zmult_cancel") 2 *}) |
wenzelm@11049 | 181 |
apply (unfold m_cond_def km_cond_def mhf_def) |
wenzelm@11049 | 182 |
apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp)) |
wenzelm@11049 | 183 |
apply safe |
wenzelm@11049 | 184 |
apply (tactic {* stac (thm "zgcd_zmult_cancel") 3 *}) |
wenzelm@11049 | 185 |
apply (rule_tac [!] funprod_zgcd) |
wenzelm@11049 | 186 |
apply safe |
wenzelm@11049 | 187 |
apply simp_all |
wenzelm@11049 | 188 |
apply (subgoal_tac [3] "ia \<le> n") |
wenzelm@11049 | 189 |
prefer 4 |
wenzelm@11049 | 190 |
apply arith |
wenzelm@11049 | 191 |
apply (subgoal_tac "i<n") |
wenzelm@11049 | 192 |
prefer 2 |
wenzelm@11049 | 193 |
apply arith |
wenzelm@11049 | 194 |
apply (case_tac [2] i) |
wenzelm@11049 | 195 |
apply simp_all |
wenzelm@11049 | 196 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 197 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 198 |
lemma aux: |
wenzelm@11049 | 199 |
"0 < n ==> i \<le> n ==> j \<le> n ==> j \<noteq> i ==> mf j dvd mhf mf n i" |
wenzelm@11049 | 200 |
apply (unfold mhf_def) |
wenzelm@11049 | 201 |
apply (case_tac "i = 0") |
wenzelm@11049 | 202 |
apply (case_tac [2] "i = n") |
wenzelm@11049 | 203 |
apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp)) |
wenzelm@11049 | 204 |
apply (case_tac [3] "j < i") |
wenzelm@11049 | 205 |
apply (rule_tac [3] zdvd_zmult2) |
wenzelm@11049 | 206 |
apply (rule_tac [4] zdvd_zmult) |
wenzelm@11049 | 207 |
apply (rule_tac [!] funprod_zdvd) |
wenzelm@11049 | 208 |
apply arith+ |
wenzelm@11049 | 209 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 210 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 211 |
lemma x_sol_lin: |
wenzelm@11049 | 212 |
"0 < n ==> i \<le> n |
wenzelm@11049 | 213 |
==> x_sol n kf bf mf mod mf i = |
wenzelm@11049 | 214 |
xilin_sol i n kf bf mf * mhf mf n i mod mf i" |
wenzelm@11049 | 215 |
apply (unfold x_sol_def) |
wenzelm@11049 | 216 |
apply (subst funsum_mod) |
wenzelm@11049 | 217 |
apply (subst funsum_oneelem) |
wenzelm@11049 | 218 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 219 |
apply (subst zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0 [symmetric]) |
wenzelm@11049 | 220 |
apply (rule zdvd_zmult) |
wenzelm@11049 | 221 |
apply (rule aux) |
wenzelm@11049 | 222 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 223 |
done |
wenzelm@11049 | 224 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 225 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 226 |
subsection {* Chinese *} |
wenzelm@11049 | 227 |
|
wenzelm@11049 | 228 |
lemma chinese_remainder: |
wenzelm@11049 | 229 |
"0 < n ==> m_cond n mf ==> km_cond n kf mf |
paulson@11868 | 230 |
==> \<exists>!x. 0 \<le> x \<and> x < funprod mf 0 n \<and> lincong_sol n kf bf mf x" |
wenzelm@11049 | 231 |
apply safe |
wenzelm@11049 | 232 |
apply (rule_tac [2] m = "funprod mf 0 n" in zcong_zless_imp_eq) |
wenzelm@11049 | 233 |
apply (rule_tac [6] zcong_funprod) |
wenzelm@11049 | 234 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 235 |
apply (rule_tac x = "x_sol n kf bf mf mod funprod mf 0 n" in exI) |
wenzelm@11049 | 236 |
apply (unfold lincong_sol_def) |
wenzelm@11049 | 237 |
apply safe |
wenzelm@11049 | 238 |
apply (tactic {* stac (thm "zcong_zmod") 3 *}) |
wenzelm@11049 | 239 |
apply (tactic {* stac (thm "zmod_zmult_distrib") 3 *}) |
wenzelm@11049 | 240 |
apply (tactic {* stac (thm "zmod_zdvd_zmod") 3 *}) |
wenzelm@11049 | 241 |
apply (tactic {* stac (thm "x_sol_lin") 5 *}) |
wenzelm@11049 | 242 |
apply (tactic {* stac (thm "zmod_zmult_distrib" RS sym) 7 *}) |
wenzelm@11049 | 243 |
apply (tactic {* stac (thm "zcong_zmod" RS sym) 7 *}) |
wenzelm@11049 | 244 |
apply (subgoal_tac [7] |
paulson@11868 | 245 |
"0 \<le> xilin_sol i n kf bf mf \<and> xilin_sol i n kf bf mf < mf i |
wenzelm@11049 | 246 |
\<and> [kf i * mhf mf n i * xilin_sol i n kf bf mf = bf i] (mod mf i)") |
wenzelm@11049 | 247 |
prefer 7 |
wenzelm@11049 | 248 |
apply (simp add: zmult_ac) |
wenzelm@11049 | 249 |
apply (unfold xilin_sol_def) |
wenzelm@11049 | 250 |
apply (tactic {* Asm_simp_tac 7 *}) |
wenzelm@11049 | 251 |
apply (rule_tac [7] ex1_implies_ex [THEN someI_ex]) |
wenzelm@11049 | 252 |
apply (rule_tac [7] unique_xi_sol) |
wenzelm@11049 | 253 |
apply (rule_tac [4] funprod_zdvd) |
wenzelm@11049 | 254 |
apply (unfold m_cond_def) |
wenzelm@11049 | 255 |
apply (rule funprod_pos [THEN pos_mod_sign]) |
wenzelm@11049 | 256 |
apply (rule_tac [2] funprod_pos [THEN pos_mod_bound]) |
wenzelm@11049 | 257 |
apply auto |
wenzelm@11049 | 258 |
done |
paulson@9508 | 259 |
|
paulson@9508 | 260 |
end |