paulson@13240
|
1 |
(* Title: ZF/pair
|
paulson@13240
|
2 |
ID: $Id$
|
paulson@13240
|
3 |
Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
|
paulson@13240
|
4 |
Copyright 1992 University of Cambridge
|
paulson@13240
|
5 |
|
paulson@13240
|
6 |
*)
|
paulson@13240
|
7 |
|
paulson@13357
|
8 |
header{*Ordered Pairs*}
|
paulson@13357
|
9 |
|
paulson@9570
|
10 |
theory pair = upair
|
wenzelm@11694
|
11 |
files "simpdata.ML":
|
paulson@13240
|
12 |
|
paulson@13240
|
13 |
(** Lemmas for showing that <a,b> uniquely determines a and b **)
|
paulson@13240
|
14 |
|
paulson@13240
|
15 |
lemma singleton_eq_iff [iff]: "{a} = {b} <-> a=b"
|
paulson@13240
|
16 |
by (rule extension [THEN iff_trans], blast)
|
paulson@13240
|
17 |
|
paulson@13240
|
18 |
lemma doubleton_eq_iff: "{a,b} = {c,d} <-> (a=c & b=d) | (a=d & b=c)"
|
paulson@13240
|
19 |
by (rule extension [THEN iff_trans], blast)
|
paulson@13240
|
20 |
|
paulson@13240
|
21 |
lemma Pair_iff [simp]: "<a,b> = <c,d> <-> a=c & b=d"
|
paulson@13240
|
22 |
by (simp add: Pair_def doubleton_eq_iff, blast)
|
paulson@13240
|
23 |
|
paulson@13240
|
24 |
lemmas Pair_inject = Pair_iff [THEN iffD1, THEN conjE, standard, elim!]
|
paulson@13240
|
25 |
|
paulson@13240
|
26 |
lemmas Pair_inject1 = Pair_iff [THEN iffD1, THEN conjunct1, standard]
|
paulson@13240
|
27 |
lemmas Pair_inject2 = Pair_iff [THEN iffD1, THEN conjunct2, standard]
|
paulson@13240
|
28 |
|
paulson@13240
|
29 |
lemma Pair_not_0: "<a,b> ~= 0"
|
paulson@13240
|
30 |
apply (unfold Pair_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
31 |
apply (blast elim: equalityE)
|
paulson@13240
|
32 |
done
|
paulson@13240
|
33 |
|
paulson@13240
|
34 |
lemmas Pair_neq_0 = Pair_not_0 [THEN notE, standard, elim!]
|
paulson@13240
|
35 |
|
paulson@13240
|
36 |
declare sym [THEN Pair_neq_0, elim!]
|
paulson@13240
|
37 |
|
paulson@13240
|
38 |
lemma Pair_neq_fst: "<a,b>=a ==> P"
|
paulson@13240
|
39 |
apply (unfold Pair_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
40 |
apply (rule consI1 [THEN mem_asym, THEN FalseE])
|
paulson@13240
|
41 |
apply (erule subst)
|
paulson@13240
|
42 |
apply (rule consI1)
|
paulson@13240
|
43 |
done
|
paulson@13240
|
44 |
|
paulson@13240
|
45 |
lemma Pair_neq_snd: "<a,b>=b ==> P"
|
paulson@13240
|
46 |
apply (unfold Pair_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
47 |
apply (rule consI1 [THEN consI2, THEN mem_asym, THEN FalseE])
|
paulson@13240
|
48 |
apply (erule subst)
|
paulson@13240
|
49 |
apply (rule consI1 [THEN consI2])
|
paulson@13240
|
50 |
done
|
paulson@13240
|
51 |
|
paulson@13240
|
52 |
|
paulson@13357
|
53 |
subsection{*Sigma: Disjoint Union of a Family of Sets*}
|
paulson@13357
|
54 |
|
paulson@13357
|
55 |
text{*Generalizes Cartesian product*}
|
paulson@13240
|
56 |
|
paulson@13240
|
57 |
lemma Sigma_iff [simp]: "<a,b>: Sigma(A,B) <-> a:A & b:B(a)"
|
paulson@13240
|
58 |
by (simp add: Sigma_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
59 |
|
paulson@13240
|
60 |
lemma SigmaI [TC,intro!]: "[| a:A; b:B(a) |] ==> <a,b> : Sigma(A,B)"
|
paulson@13240
|
61 |
by simp
|
paulson@13240
|
62 |
|
paulson@13240
|
63 |
lemmas SigmaD1 = Sigma_iff [THEN iffD1, THEN conjunct1, standard]
|
paulson@13240
|
64 |
lemmas SigmaD2 = Sigma_iff [THEN iffD1, THEN conjunct2, standard]
|
paulson@13240
|
65 |
|
paulson@13240
|
66 |
(*The general elimination rule*)
|
paulson@13240
|
67 |
lemma SigmaE [elim!]:
|
paulson@13240
|
68 |
"[| c: Sigma(A,B);
|
paulson@13240
|
69 |
!!x y.[| x:A; y:B(x); c=<x,y> |] ==> P
|
paulson@13240
|
70 |
|] ==> P"
|
paulson@13357
|
71 |
by (unfold Sigma_def, blast)
|
paulson@13240
|
72 |
|
paulson@13240
|
73 |
lemma SigmaE2 [elim!]:
|
paulson@13240
|
74 |
"[| <a,b> : Sigma(A,B);
|
paulson@13240
|
75 |
[| a:A; b:B(a) |] ==> P
|
paulson@13240
|
76 |
|] ==> P"
|
paulson@13357
|
77 |
by (unfold Sigma_def, blast)
|
paulson@13240
|
78 |
|
paulson@13240
|
79 |
lemma Sigma_cong:
|
paulson@13240
|
80 |
"[| A=A'; !!x. x:A' ==> B(x)=B'(x) |] ==>
|
paulson@13240
|
81 |
Sigma(A,B) = Sigma(A',B')"
|
paulson@13240
|
82 |
by (simp add: Sigma_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
83 |
|
paulson@13240
|
84 |
(*Sigma_cong, Pi_cong NOT given to Addcongs: they cause
|
paulson@13240
|
85 |
flex-flex pairs and the "Check your prover" error. Most
|
paulson@13240
|
86 |
Sigmas and Pis are abbreviated as * or -> *)
|
paulson@13240
|
87 |
|
paulson@13240
|
88 |
lemma Sigma_empty1 [simp]: "Sigma(0,B) = 0"
|
paulson@13240
|
89 |
by blast
|
paulson@13240
|
90 |
|
paulson@13240
|
91 |
lemma Sigma_empty2 [simp]: "A*0 = 0"
|
paulson@13240
|
92 |
by blast
|
paulson@13240
|
93 |
|
paulson@13240
|
94 |
lemma Sigma_empty_iff: "A*B=0 <-> A=0 | B=0"
|
paulson@13240
|
95 |
by blast
|
paulson@13240
|
96 |
|
paulson@13240
|
97 |
|
paulson@13357
|
98 |
subsection{*Projections @{term fst} and @{term snd}*}
|
paulson@13240
|
99 |
|
paulson@13240
|
100 |
lemma fst_conv [simp]: "fst(<a,b>) = a"
|
paulson@13544
|
101 |
by (simp add: fst_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
102 |
|
paulson@13240
|
103 |
lemma snd_conv [simp]: "snd(<a,b>) = b"
|
paulson@13544
|
104 |
by (simp add: snd_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
105 |
|
paulson@13240
|
106 |
lemma fst_type [TC]: "p:Sigma(A,B) ==> fst(p) : A"
|
paulson@13240
|
107 |
by auto
|
paulson@13240
|
108 |
|
paulson@13240
|
109 |
lemma snd_type [TC]: "p:Sigma(A,B) ==> snd(p) : B(fst(p))"
|
paulson@13240
|
110 |
by auto
|
paulson@13240
|
111 |
|
paulson@13240
|
112 |
lemma Pair_fst_snd_eq: "a: Sigma(A,B) ==> <fst(a),snd(a)> = a"
|
paulson@13240
|
113 |
by auto
|
paulson@13240
|
114 |
|
paulson@13240
|
115 |
|
paulson@13357
|
116 |
subsection{*The Eliminator, @{term split}*}
|
paulson@13240
|
117 |
|
paulson@13240
|
118 |
(*A META-equality, so that it applies to higher types as well...*)
|
paulson@13240
|
119 |
lemma split [simp]: "split(%x y. c(x,y), <a,b>) == c(a,b)"
|
paulson@13240
|
120 |
by (simp add: split_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
121 |
|
paulson@13240
|
122 |
lemma split_type [TC]:
|
paulson@13240
|
123 |
"[| p:Sigma(A,B);
|
paulson@13240
|
124 |
!!x y.[| x:A; y:B(x) |] ==> c(x,y):C(<x,y>)
|
paulson@13240
|
125 |
|] ==> split(%x y. c(x,y), p) : C(p)"
|
paulson@13240
|
126 |
apply (erule SigmaE, auto)
|
paulson@13240
|
127 |
done
|
paulson@13240
|
128 |
|
paulson@13240
|
129 |
lemma expand_split:
|
paulson@13240
|
130 |
"u: A*B ==>
|
paulson@13240
|
131 |
R(split(c,u)) <-> (ALL x:A. ALL y:B. u = <x,y> --> R(c(x,y)))"
|
paulson@13240
|
132 |
apply (simp add: split_def, auto)
|
paulson@13240
|
133 |
done
|
paulson@13240
|
134 |
|
paulson@13240
|
135 |
|
paulson@13357
|
136 |
subsection{*A version of @{term split} for Formulae: Result Type @{typ o}*}
|
paulson@13240
|
137 |
|
paulson@13240
|
138 |
lemma splitI: "R(a,b) ==> split(R, <a,b>)"
|
paulson@13240
|
139 |
by (simp add: split_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
140 |
|
paulson@13240
|
141 |
lemma splitE:
|
paulson@13240
|
142 |
"[| split(R,z); z:Sigma(A,B);
|
paulson@13240
|
143 |
!!x y. [| z = <x,y>; R(x,y) |] ==> P
|
paulson@13240
|
144 |
|] ==> P"
|
paulson@13240
|
145 |
apply (simp add: split_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
146 |
apply (erule SigmaE, force)
|
paulson@13240
|
147 |
done
|
paulson@13240
|
148 |
|
paulson@13240
|
149 |
lemma splitD: "split(R,<a,b>) ==> R(a,b)"
|
paulson@13240
|
150 |
by (simp add: split_def)
|
paulson@13240
|
151 |
|
paulson@14864
|
152 |
text {*
|
paulson@14864
|
153 |
\bigskip Complex rules for Sigma.
|
paulson@14864
|
154 |
*}
|
paulson@14864
|
155 |
|
paulson@14864
|
156 |
lemma split_paired_Bex_Sigma [simp]:
|
paulson@14864
|
157 |
"(\<exists>z \<in> Sigma(A,B). P(z)) <-> (\<exists>x \<in> A. \<exists>y \<in> B(x). P(<x,y>))"
|
paulson@14864
|
158 |
by blast
|
paulson@14864
|
159 |
|
paulson@14864
|
160 |
lemma split_paired_Ball_Sigma [simp]:
|
paulson@14864
|
161 |
"(\<forall>z \<in> Sigma(A,B). P(z)) <-> (\<forall>x \<in> A. \<forall>y \<in> B(x). P(<x,y>))"
|
paulson@14864
|
162 |
by blast
|
paulson@14864
|
163 |
|
paulson@13240
|
164 |
ML
|
paulson@13240
|
165 |
{*
|
paulson@13240
|
166 |
val singleton_eq_iff = thm "singleton_eq_iff";
|
paulson@13240
|
167 |
val doubleton_eq_iff = thm "doubleton_eq_iff";
|
paulson@13240
|
168 |
val Pair_iff = thm "Pair_iff";
|
paulson@13240
|
169 |
val Pair_inject = thm "Pair_inject";
|
paulson@13240
|
170 |
val Pair_inject1 = thm "Pair_inject1";
|
paulson@13240
|
171 |
val Pair_inject2 = thm "Pair_inject2";
|
paulson@13240
|
172 |
val Pair_not_0 = thm "Pair_not_0";
|
paulson@13240
|
173 |
val Pair_neq_0 = thm "Pair_neq_0";
|
paulson@13240
|
174 |
val Pair_neq_fst = thm "Pair_neq_fst";
|
paulson@13240
|
175 |
val Pair_neq_snd = thm "Pair_neq_snd";
|
paulson@13240
|
176 |
val Sigma_iff = thm "Sigma_iff";
|
paulson@13240
|
177 |
val SigmaI = thm "SigmaI";
|
paulson@13240
|
178 |
val SigmaD1 = thm "SigmaD1";
|
paulson@13240
|
179 |
val SigmaD2 = thm "SigmaD2";
|
paulson@13240
|
180 |
val SigmaE = thm "SigmaE";
|
paulson@13240
|
181 |
val SigmaE2 = thm "SigmaE2";
|
paulson@13240
|
182 |
val Sigma_cong = thm "Sigma_cong";
|
paulson@13240
|
183 |
val Sigma_empty1 = thm "Sigma_empty1";
|
paulson@13240
|
184 |
val Sigma_empty2 = thm "Sigma_empty2";
|
paulson@13240
|
185 |
val Sigma_empty_iff = thm "Sigma_empty_iff";
|
paulson@13240
|
186 |
val fst_conv = thm "fst_conv";
|
paulson@13240
|
187 |
val snd_conv = thm "snd_conv";
|
paulson@13240
|
188 |
val fst_type = thm "fst_type";
|
paulson@13240
|
189 |
val snd_type = thm "snd_type";
|
paulson@13240
|
190 |
val Pair_fst_snd_eq = thm "Pair_fst_snd_eq";
|
paulson@13240
|
191 |
val split = thm "split";
|
paulson@13240
|
192 |
val split_type = thm "split_type";
|
paulson@13240
|
193 |
val expand_split = thm "expand_split";
|
paulson@13240
|
194 |
val splitI = thm "splitI";
|
paulson@13240
|
195 |
val splitE = thm "splitE";
|
paulson@13240
|
196 |
val splitD = thm "splitD";
|
paulson@13240
|
197 |
*}
|
paulson@13240
|
198 |
|
paulson@9570
|
199 |
end
|
clasohm@124
|
200 |
|
paulson@2469
|
201 |
|