1.1 --- a/src/HOL/Import/HOL/real.imp Sun May 09 09:39:01 2010 -0700
1.2 +++ b/src/HOL/Import/HOL/real.imp Sun May 09 14:21:44 2010 -0700
1.3 @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
1.4 "REAL_INV_POS" > "Rings.positive_imp_inverse_positive"
1.5 "REAL_INV_NZ" > "Rings.nonzero_imp_inverse_nonzero"
1.6 "REAL_INV_MUL" > "HOL4Real.real.REAL_INV_MUL"
1.7 - "REAL_INV_LT1" > "RealDef.real_inverse_gt_one"
1.8 + "REAL_INV_LT1" > "Fields.one_less_inverse"
1.9 "REAL_INV_INV" > "Rings.inverse_inverse_eq"
1.10 "REAL_INV_EQ_0" > "Rings.inverse_nonzero_iff_nonzero"
1.11 "REAL_INV_1OVER" > "Rings.inverse_eq_divide"
2.1 --- a/src/HOL/RealDef.thy Sun May 09 09:39:01 2010 -0700
2.2 +++ b/src/HOL/RealDef.thy Sun May 09 14:21:44 2010 -0700
2.3 @@ -506,26 +506,24 @@
2.4
2.5 subsection{*More Lemmas*}
2.6
2.7 +text {* BH: These lemmas should not be necessary; they should be
2.8 +covered by existing simp rules and simplification procedures. *}
2.9 +
2.10 lemma real_mult_left_cancel: "(c::real) \<noteq> 0 ==> (c*a=c*b) = (a=b)"
2.11 -by auto
2.12 +by simp (* redundant with mult_cancel_left *)
2.13
2.14 lemma real_mult_right_cancel: "(c::real) \<noteq> 0 ==> (a*c=b*c) = (a=b)"
2.15 -by auto
2.16 +by simp (* redundant with mult_cancel_right *)
2.17
2.18 lemma real_mult_less_iff1 [simp]: "(0::real) < z ==> (x*z < y*z) = (x < y)"
2.19 - by (force elim: order_less_asym
2.20 - simp add: mult_less_cancel_right)
2.21 +by simp (* solved by linordered_ring_less_cancel_factor simproc *)
2.22
2.23 lemma real_mult_le_cancel_iff1 [simp]: "(0::real) < z ==> (x*z \<le> y*z) = (x\<le>y)"
2.24 -apply (simp add: mult_le_cancel_right)
2.25 -apply (blast intro: elim: order_less_asym)
2.26 -done
2.27 +by simp (* solved by linordered_ring_le_cancel_factor simproc *)
2.28
2.29 lemma real_mult_le_cancel_iff2 [simp]: "(0::real) < z ==> (z*x \<le> z*y) = (x\<le>y)"
2.30 -by(simp add:mult_commute)
2.31 -
2.32 -lemma real_inverse_gt_one: "[| (0::real) < x; x < 1 |] ==> 1 < inverse x"
2.33 -by (simp add: one_less_inverse_iff) (* TODO: generalize/move *)
2.34 +by (rule mult_le_cancel_left_pos)
2.35 +(* BH: Why doesn't "simp" prove this one, like it does the last one? *)
2.36
2.37
2.38 subsection {* Embedding numbers into the Reals *}
2.39 @@ -773,10 +771,6 @@
2.40 lemma not_real_of_nat_less_zero [simp]: "~ real (n::nat) < 0"
2.41 by (simp add: add: real_of_nat_def)
2.42
2.43 -(* FIXME: duplicates real_of_nat_ge_zero *)
2.44 -lemma real_of_nat_ge_zero_cancel_iff: "(0 \<le> real (n::nat))"
2.45 -by (simp add: add: real_of_nat_def)
2.46 -
2.47 lemma nat_less_real_le: "((n::nat) < m) = (real n + 1 <= real m)"
2.48 apply (subgoal_tac "real n + 1 = real (Suc n)")
2.49 apply simp
2.50 @@ -1013,12 +1007,6 @@
2.51 by auto
2.52
2.53
2.54 -(*
2.55 -FIXME: we should have this, as for type int, but many proofs would break.
2.56 -It replaces x+-y by x-y.
2.57 -declare real_diff_def [symmetric, simp]
2.58 -*)
2.59 -
2.60 subsubsection{*Density of the Reals*}
2.61
2.62 lemma real_lbound_gt_zero:
3.1 --- a/src/HOL/SEQ.thy Sun May 09 09:39:01 2010 -0700
3.2 +++ b/src/HOL/SEQ.thy Sun May 09 14:21:44 2010 -0700
3.3 @@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@
3.4 hence x0: "0 < x" by simp
3.5 assume x1: "x < 1"
3.6 from x0 x1 have "1 < inverse x"
3.7 - by (rule real_inverse_gt_one)
3.8 + by (rule one_less_inverse)
3.9 hence "(\<lambda>n. inverse (inverse x ^ n)) ----> 0"
3.10 by (rule LIMSEQ_inverse_realpow_zero)
3.11 thus ?thesis by (simp add: power_inverse)
4.1 --- a/src/HOL/Transcendental.thy Sun May 09 09:39:01 2010 -0700
4.2 +++ b/src/HOL/Transcendental.thy Sun May 09 14:21:44 2010 -0700
4.3 @@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@
4.4 apply (rule_tac x = 1 and y = y in linorder_cases)
4.5 apply (drule order_less_imp_le [THEN lemma_exp_total])
4.6 apply (rule_tac [2] x = 0 in exI)
4.7 -apply (frule_tac [3] real_inverse_gt_one)
4.8 +apply (frule_tac [3] one_less_inverse)
4.9 apply (drule_tac [4] order_less_imp_le [THEN lemma_exp_total], auto)
4.10 apply (rule_tac x = "-x" in exI)
4.11 apply (simp add: exp_minus)