"no_atp" fact that leads to unsound proofs
authorblanchet
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:13:58 +0200
changeset 3888714c207135eff
parent 38886 52ea97d95e4b
child 38888 f22a564ac820
"no_atp" fact that leads to unsound proofs
src/HOL/Set.thy
     1.1 --- a/src/HOL/Set.thy	Mon Aug 23 11:56:30 2010 +0200
     1.2 +++ b/src/HOL/Set.thy	Mon Aug 23 12:13:58 2010 +0200
     1.3 @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@
     1.4    apply (rule Collect_mem_eq)
     1.5    done
     1.6  
     1.7 -lemma expand_set_eq: "(A = B) = (ALL x. (x:A) = (x:B))"
     1.8 +lemma expand_set_eq [no_atp]: "(A = B) = (ALL x. (x:A) = (x:B))"
     1.9  by(auto intro:set_ext)
    1.10  
    1.11  lemma subset_antisym [intro!]: "A \<subseteq> B ==> B \<subseteq> A ==> A = B"