1 (* Title: HOL/Nominal/nominal_inductive.ML
3 Author: Stefan Berghofer, TU Muenchen
5 Infrastructure for proving equivariance and strong induction theorems
6 for inductive predicates involving nominal datatypes.
9 signature NOMINAL_INDUCTIVE =
11 val prove_strong_ind: string -> (string * string list) list -> theory -> Proof.state
12 val prove_eqvt: string -> string list -> theory -> theory
15 structure NominalInductive : NOMINAL_INDUCTIVE =
18 val inductive_forall_name = "HOL.induct_forall";
19 val inductive_forall_def = thm "induct_forall_def";
20 val inductive_atomize = thms "induct_atomize";
21 val inductive_rulify = thms "induct_rulify";
23 fun rulify_term thy = MetaSimplifier.rewrite_term thy inductive_rulify [];
26 MetaSimplifier.rewrite_cterm (true, false, false) (K (K NONE))
27 (HOL_basic_ss addsimps inductive_atomize);
28 val atomize_intr = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.prems_conv ~1 atomize_conv);
29 fun atomize_induct ctxt = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.prems_conv ~1
30 (Conv.forall_conv ~1 (K (Conv.prems_conv ~1 atomize_conv)) ctxt));
32 val finite_Un = thm "finite_Un";
33 val supp_prod = thm "supp_prod";
34 val fresh_prod = thm "fresh_prod";
36 val perm_bool = mk_meta_eq (thm "perm_bool");
37 val perm_boolI = thm "perm_boolI";
38 val (_, [perm_boolI_pi, _]) = Drule.strip_comb (snd (Thm.dest_comb
39 (Drule.strip_imp_concl (cprop_of perm_boolI))));
41 fun mk_perm_bool_simproc names = Simplifier.simproc_i
42 (theory_of_thm perm_bool) "perm_bool" [@{term "perm pi x"}] (fn thy => fn ss =>
43 fn Const ("Nominal.perm", _) $ _ $ t =>
44 if the_default "" (try (head_of #> dest_Const #> fst) t) mem names
45 then SOME perm_bool else NONE
48 val allE_Nil = read_instantiate_sg (the_context()) [("x", "[]")] allE;
50 fun transp ([] :: _) = []
51 | transp xs = map hd xs :: transp (map tl xs);
53 fun add_binders thy i (t as (_ $ _)) bs = (case strip_comb t of
54 (Const (s, T), ts) => (case strip_type T of
55 (Ts, Type (tname, _)) =>
56 (case NominalPackage.get_nominal_datatype thy tname of
57 NONE => fold (add_binders thy i) ts bs
58 | SOME {descr, index, ...} => (case AList.lookup op =
59 (#3 (the (AList.lookup op = descr index))) s of
60 NONE => fold (add_binders thy i) ts bs
61 | SOME cargs => fst (fold (fn (xs, x) => fn (bs', cargs') =>
62 let val (cargs1, (u, _) :: cargs2) = chop (length xs) cargs'
63 in (add_binders thy i u
65 if exists (fn j => j < i) (loose_bnos u) then I
66 else insert (op aconv o pairself fst)
67 (incr_boundvars (~i) u, T)) cargs1 bs'), cargs2)
68 end) cargs (bs, ts ~~ Ts))))
69 | _ => fold (add_binders thy i) ts bs)
70 | (u, ts) => add_binders thy i u (fold (add_binders thy i) ts bs))
71 | add_binders thy i (Abs (_, _, t)) bs = add_binders thy (i + 1) t bs
72 | add_binders thy i _ bs = bs;
74 fun split_conj f names (Const ("op &", _) $ p $ q) _ = (case head_of p of
76 if name mem names then SOME (f p q) else NONE
78 | split_conj _ _ _ _ = NONE;
80 fun strip_all [] t = t
81 | strip_all (_ :: xs) (Const ("All", _) $ Abs (s, T, t)) = strip_all xs t;
83 (*********************************************************************)
84 (* maps R ... & (ALL pi_1 ... pi_n z. P z (pi_1 o ... o pi_n o t)) *)
85 (* or ALL pi_1 ... pi_n. P (pi_1 o ... o pi_n o t) *)
86 (* to R ... & id (ALL z. (pi_1 o ... o pi_n o t)) *)
87 (* or id (ALL z. (pi_1 o ... o pi_n o t)) *)
89 (* where "id" protects the subformula from simplification *)
90 (*********************************************************************)
92 fun inst_conj_all names ps pis (Const ("op &", _) $ p $ q) _ =
95 if name mem names then SOME (HOLogic.mk_conj (p,
96 Const ("Fun.id", HOLogic.boolT --> HOLogic.boolT) $
97 (subst_bounds (pis, strip_all pis q))))
100 | inst_conj_all names ps pis t u =
101 if member (op aconv) ps (head_of u) then
102 SOME (Const ("Fun.id", HOLogic.boolT --> HOLogic.boolT) $
103 (subst_bounds (pis, strip_all pis t)))
105 | inst_conj_all _ _ _ _ _ = NONE;
107 fun inst_conj_all_tac k = EVERY
108 [TRY (EVERY [etac conjE 1, rtac conjI 1, atac 1]),
109 REPEAT_DETERM_N k (etac allE 1),
110 simp_tac (HOL_basic_ss addsimps [id_apply]) 1];
112 fun map_term f t u = (case f t u of
113 NONE => map_term' f t u | x => x)
114 and map_term' f (t $ u) (t' $ u') = (case (map_term f t t', map_term f u u') of
116 | (SOME t'', NONE) => SOME (t'' $ u)
117 | (NONE, SOME u'') => SOME (t $ u'')
118 | (SOME t'', SOME u'') => SOME (t'' $ u''))
119 | map_term' f (Abs (s, T, t)) (Abs (s', T', t')) = (case map_term f t t' of
121 | SOME t'' => SOME (Abs (s, T, t'')))
122 | map_term' _ _ _ = NONE;
124 (*********************************************************************)
125 (* Prove F[f t] from F[t], where F is monotone *)
126 (*********************************************************************)
128 fun map_thm ctxt f tac monos opt th =
130 val prop = prop_of th;
132 Goal.prove ctxt [] [] t (fn _ =>
133 EVERY [cut_facts_tac [th] 1, etac rev_mp 1,
134 REPEAT_DETERM (FIRSTGOAL (resolve_tac monos)),
135 REPEAT_DETERM (rtac impI 1 THEN (atac 1 ORELSE tac))])
136 in Option.map prove (map_term f prop (the_default prop opt)) end;
138 fun prove_strong_ind s avoids thy =
140 val ctxt = ProofContext.init thy;
141 val ({names, ...}, {raw_induct, ...}) =
142 InductivePackage.the_inductive ctxt (Sign.intern_const thy s);
143 val raw_induct = atomize_induct ctxt raw_induct;
144 val monos = InductivePackage.get_monos ctxt;
145 val eqvt_thms = NominalThmDecls.get_eqvt_thms ctxt;
146 val _ = (case names \\ foldl (apfst prop_of #> add_term_consts) [] eqvt_thms of
148 | xs => error ("Missing equivariance theorem for predicate(s): " ^
150 val induct_cases = map fst (fst (RuleCases.get (the
151 (Induct.lookup_inductP ctxt (hd names)))));
152 val raw_induct' = Logic.unvarify (prop_of raw_induct);
153 val concls = raw_induct' |> Logic.strip_imp_concl |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |>
154 HOLogic.dest_conj |> map (HOLogic.dest_imp ##> strip_comb);
155 val ps = map (fst o snd) concls;
157 val _ = (case duplicates (op = o pairself fst) avoids of
159 | xs => error ("Duplicate case names: " ^ commas_quote (map fst xs)));
160 val _ = assert_all (null o duplicates op = o snd) avoids
161 (fn (a, _) => error ("Duplicate variable names for case " ^ quote a));
162 val _ = (case map fst avoids \\ induct_cases of
164 | xs => error ("No such case(s) in inductive definition: " ^ commas_quote xs));
165 val avoids' = map (fn name =>
166 (name, the_default [] (AList.lookup op = avoids name))) induct_cases;
167 fun mk_avoids params (name, ps) =
168 let val k = length params - 1
169 in map (fn x => case find_index (equal x o fst) params of
170 ~1 => error ("No such variable in case " ^ quote name ^
171 " of inductive definition: " ^ quote x)
172 | i => (Bound (k - i), snd (nth params i))) ps
175 val prems = map (fn (prem, avoid) =>
177 val prems = map (incr_boundvars 1) (Logic.strip_assums_hyp prem);
178 val concl = incr_boundvars 1 (Logic.strip_assums_concl prem);
179 val params = Logic.strip_params prem
182 fold (add_binders thy 0) (prems @ [concl]) [] @
183 map (apfst (incr_boundvars 1)) (mk_avoids params avoid),
184 prems, strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop concl))
185 end) (Logic.strip_imp_prems raw_induct' ~~ avoids');
187 val atomTs = distinct op = (maps (map snd o #2) prems);
188 val ind_sort = if null atomTs then HOLogic.typeS
189 else Sign.certify_sort thy (map (fn T => Sign.intern_class thy
190 ("fs_" ^ Sign.base_name (fst (dest_Type T)))) atomTs);
191 val fs_ctxt_tyname = Name.variant (map fst (term_tfrees raw_induct')) "'n";
192 val fs_ctxt_name = Name.variant (add_term_names (raw_induct', [])) "z";
193 val fsT = TFree (fs_ctxt_tyname, ind_sort);
195 val inductive_forall_def' = Drule.instantiate'
196 [SOME (ctyp_of thy fsT)] [] inductive_forall_def;
198 fun lift_pred' t (Free (s, T)) ts =
199 list_comb (Free (s, fsT --> T), t :: ts);
200 val lift_pred = lift_pred' (Bound 0);
202 fun lift_prem (t as (f $ u)) =
203 let val (p, ts) = strip_comb t
206 Const (inductive_forall_name,
207 (fsT --> HOLogic.boolT) --> HOLogic.boolT) $
208 Abs ("z", fsT, lift_pred p (map (incr_boundvars 1) ts))
209 else lift_prem f $ lift_prem u
211 | lift_prem (Abs (s, T, t)) = Abs (s, T, lift_prem t)
214 fun mk_distinct [] = []
215 | mk_distinct ((x, T) :: xs) = List.mapPartial (fn (y, U) =>
216 if T = U then SOME (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
217 (HOLogic.mk_not (HOLogic.eq_const T $ x $ y)))
218 else NONE) xs @ mk_distinct xs;
220 fun mk_fresh (x, T) = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
221 (Const ("Nominal.fresh", T --> fsT --> HOLogic.boolT) $ x $ Bound 0);
223 val (prems', prems'') = split_list (map (fn (params, bvars, prems, (p, ts)) =>
225 val params' = params @ [("y", fsT)];
226 val prem = Logic.list_implies
227 (map mk_fresh bvars @ mk_distinct bvars @
229 if null (term_frees prem inter ps) then prem
230 else lift_prem prem) prems,
231 HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (lift_pred p ts));
232 val vs = map (Var o apfst (rpair 0)) (rename_wrt_term prem params')
234 (list_all (params', prem), (rev vs, subst_bounds (vs, prem)))
238 (DatatypeProp.indexify_names (replicate (length atomTs) "pi") ~~
239 map NominalAtoms.mk_permT atomTs) @ [("z", fsT)];
240 val ind_Ts = rev (map snd ind_vars);
242 val concl = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (foldr1 HOLogic.mk_conj
243 (map (fn (prem, (p, ts)) => HOLogic.mk_imp (prem,
244 HOLogic.list_all (ind_vars, lift_pred p
245 (map (fold_rev (NominalPackage.mk_perm ind_Ts)
246 (map Bound (length atomTs downto 1))) ts)))) concls));
248 val concl' = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (foldr1 HOLogic.mk_conj
249 (map (fn (prem, (p, ts)) => HOLogic.mk_imp (prem,
250 lift_pred' (Free (fs_ctxt_name, fsT)) p ts)) concls));
252 val vc_compat = map (fn (params, bvars, prems, (p, ts)) =>
253 map (fn q => list_all (params, incr_boundvars ~1 (Logic.list_implies
254 (List.mapPartial (fn prem =>
255 if null (ps inter term_frees prem) then SOME prem
256 else map_term (split_conj (K o I) names) prem prem) prems, q))))
258 maps (fn (t, T) => map (fn (u, U) => HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
259 (Const ("Nominal.fresh", U --> T --> HOLogic.boolT) $ u $ t)) bvars)
260 (ts ~~ binder_types (fastype_of p)))) prems;
262 val perm_pi_simp = PureThy.get_thms thy (Name "perm_pi_simp");
263 val pt2_atoms = map (fn aT => PureThy.get_thm thy
264 (Name ("pt_" ^ Sign.base_name (fst (dest_Type aT)) ^ "2"))) atomTs;
265 val eqvt_ss = HOL_basic_ss addsimps (eqvt_thms @ perm_pi_simp @ pt2_atoms)
266 addsimprocs [mk_perm_bool_simproc ["Fun.id"]];
267 val fresh_bij = PureThy.get_thms thy (Name "fresh_bij");
268 val perm_bij = PureThy.get_thms thy (Name "perm_bij");
269 val fs_atoms = map (fn aT => PureThy.get_thm thy
270 (Name ("fs_" ^ Sign.base_name (fst (dest_Type aT)) ^ "1"))) atomTs;
271 val exists_fresh' = PureThy.get_thms thy (Name "exists_fresh'");
272 val fresh_atm = PureThy.get_thms thy (Name "fresh_atm");
273 val calc_atm = PureThy.get_thms thy (Name "calc_atm");
274 val perm_fresh_fresh = PureThy.get_thms thy (Name "perm_fresh_fresh");
276 fun obtain_fresh_name ts T (freshs1, freshs2, ctxt) =
278 (** protect terms to avoid that supp_prod interferes with **)
279 (** pairs used in introduction rules of inductive predicate **)
281 let val T = fastype_of t in Const ("Fun.id", T --> T) $ t end;
282 val p = foldr1 HOLogic.mk_prod (map protect ts @ freshs1);
283 val ex = Goal.prove ctxt [] [] (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
284 (HOLogic.exists_const T $ Abs ("x", T,
285 Const ("Nominal.fresh", T --> fastype_of p --> HOLogic.boolT) $
288 [resolve_tac exists_fresh' 1,
289 simp_tac (HOL_ss addsimps (supp_prod :: finite_Un :: fs_atoms)) 1]);
290 val (([cx], ths), ctxt') = Obtain.result
293 full_simp_tac (HOL_ss addsimps (fresh_prod :: fresh_atm)) 1,
294 full_simp_tac (HOL_basic_ss addsimps [id_apply]) 1,
295 REPEAT (etac conjE 1)])
297 in (freshs1 @ [term_of cx], freshs2 @ ths, ctxt') end;
299 fun mk_proof thy thss =
300 let val ctxt = ProofContext.init thy
301 in Goal.prove_global thy [] prems' concl' (fn ihyps =>
302 let val th = Goal.prove ctxt [] [] concl (fn {context, ...} =>
303 rtac raw_induct 1 THEN
304 EVERY (maps (fn ((((_, bvars, oprems, _), vc_compat_ths), ihyp), (vs, ihypt)) =>
305 [REPEAT (rtac allI 1), simp_tac eqvt_ss 1,
306 SUBPROOF (fn {prems = gprems, params, concl, context = ctxt', ...} =>
308 val (params', (pis, z)) =
309 chop (length params - length atomTs - 1) (map term_of params) ||>
312 (fn (Bound i, T) => (nth params' (length params' - i), T)
313 | (t, T) => (t, T)) bvars;
314 val pi_bvars = map (fn (t, _) =>
315 fold_rev (NominalPackage.mk_perm []) pis t) bvars';
316 val (P, ts) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (term_of concl));
317 val (freshs1, freshs2, ctxt'') = fold
318 (obtain_fresh_name (ts @ pi_bvars))
319 (map snd bvars') ([], [], ctxt');
320 val freshs2' = NominalPackage.mk_not_sym freshs2;
321 val pis' = map NominalPackage.perm_of_pair (pi_bvars ~~ freshs1);
322 fun concat_perm pi1 pi2 =
323 let val T = fastype_of pi1
324 in if T = fastype_of pi2 then
325 Const ("List.append", T --> T --> T) $ pi1 $ pi2
328 val pis'' = fold (concat_perm #> map) pis' pis;
329 val env = Pattern.first_order_match thy (ihypt, prop_of ihyp)
330 (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty);
331 val ihyp' = Thm.instantiate ([], map (pairself (cterm_of thy))
332 (map (Envir.subst_vars env) vs ~~
333 map (fold_rev (NominalPackage.mk_perm [])
334 (rev pis' @ pis)) params' @ [z])) ihyp;
336 Simplifier.simplify (HOL_basic_ss addsimps [id_apply]
337 addsimprocs [NominalPackage.perm_simproc])
338 (Simplifier.simplify eqvt_ss
339 (fold_rev (fn pi => fn th' => th' RS Drule.cterm_instantiate
340 [(perm_boolI_pi, cterm_of thy pi)] perm_boolI)
341 (rev pis' @ pis) th));
342 val (gprems1, gprems2) = split_list
344 if null (term_frees t inter ps) then (SOME th, mk_pi th)
346 (map_thm ctxt (split_conj (K o I) names)
347 (etac conjunct1 1) monos NONE th,
348 mk_pi (the (map_thm ctxt (inst_conj_all names ps (rev pis''))
349 (inst_conj_all_tac (length pis'')) monos (SOME t) th))))
350 (gprems ~~ oprems)) |>> List.mapPartial I;
351 val vc_compat_ths' = map (fn th =>
353 val th' = gprems1 MRS
354 Thm.instantiate (Thm.first_order_match
355 (Conjunction.mk_conjunction_balanced (cprems_of th),
356 Conjunction.mk_conjunction_balanced (map cprop_of gprems1))) th;
357 val (bop, lhs, rhs) = (case concl_of th' of
358 _ $ (fresh $ lhs $ rhs) =>
359 (fn t => fn u => fresh $ t $ u, lhs, rhs)
360 | _ $ (_ $ (_ $ lhs $ rhs)) =>
361 (curry (HOLogic.mk_not o HOLogic.mk_eq), lhs, rhs));
362 val th'' = Goal.prove ctxt'' [] [] (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
363 (bop (fold_rev (NominalPackage.mk_perm []) pis lhs)
364 (fold_rev (NominalPackage.mk_perm []) pis rhs)))
365 (fn _ => simp_tac (HOL_basic_ss addsimps
366 (fresh_bij @ perm_bij)) 1 THEN rtac th' 1)
367 in Simplifier.simplify (eqvt_ss addsimps fresh_atm) th'' end)
369 val vc_compat_ths'' = NominalPackage.mk_not_sym vc_compat_ths';
370 (** Since calc_atm simplifies (pi :: 'a prm) o (x :: 'b) to x **)
371 (** we have to pre-simplify the rewrite rules **)
372 val calc_atm_ss = HOL_ss addsimps calc_atm @
373 map (Simplifier.simplify (HOL_ss addsimps calc_atm))
374 (vc_compat_ths'' @ freshs2');
375 val th = Goal.prove ctxt'' [] []
376 (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (list_comb (P $ hd ts,
377 map (fold (NominalPackage.mk_perm []) pis') (tl ts))))
378 (fn _ => EVERY ([simp_tac eqvt_ss 1, rtac ihyp' 1,
379 REPEAT_DETERM_N (nprems_of ihyp - length gprems)
380 (simp_tac calc_atm_ss 1),
381 REPEAT_DETERM_N (length gprems)
383 addsimps inductive_forall_def' :: gprems2
384 addsimprocs [NominalPackage.perm_simproc]) 1)]));
385 val final = Goal.prove ctxt'' [] [] (term_of concl)
386 (fn _ => cut_facts_tac [th] 1 THEN full_simp_tac (HOL_ss
387 addsimps vc_compat_ths'' @ freshs2' @
388 perm_fresh_fresh @ fresh_atm) 1);
389 val final' = ProofContext.export ctxt'' ctxt' [final];
390 in resolve_tac final' 1 end) context 1])
391 (prems ~~ thss ~~ ihyps ~~ prems'')))
393 cut_facts_tac [th] 1 THEN REPEAT (etac conjE 1) THEN
394 REPEAT (REPEAT (resolve_tac [conjI, impI] 1) THEN
395 etac impE 1 THEN atac 1 THEN REPEAT (etac allE_Nil 1) THEN
396 asm_full_simp_tac (simpset_of thy) 1)
403 Proof.theorem_i NONE (fn thss => ProofContext.theory (fn thy =>
405 val ctxt = ProofContext.init thy;
406 val rec_name = space_implode "_" (map Sign.base_name names);
407 val ind_case_names = RuleCases.case_names induct_cases;
408 val strong_raw_induct =
409 mk_proof thy (map (map atomize_intr) thss) |>
410 InductivePackage.rulify;
412 if length names > 1 then
413 (strong_raw_induct, [ind_case_names, RuleCases.consumes 0])
414 else (strong_raw_induct RSN (2, rev_mp),
415 [ind_case_names, RuleCases.consumes 1]);
416 val ([strong_induct'], thy') = thy |>
417 Sign.add_path rec_name |>
418 PureThy.add_thms [(("strong_induct", #1 strong_induct), #2 strong_induct)];
420 ProjectRule.projects ctxt (1 upto length names) strong_induct'
423 PureThy.add_thmss [(("strong_inducts", strong_inducts),
424 [ind_case_names, RuleCases.consumes 1])] |> snd |>
427 (map (map (rulify_term thy #> rpair [])) vc_compat)
430 fun prove_eqvt s xatoms thy =
432 val ctxt = ProofContext.init thy;
433 val ({names, ...}, {raw_induct, intrs, elims, ...}) =
434 InductivePackage.the_inductive ctxt (Sign.intern_const thy s);
435 val raw_induct = atomize_induct ctxt raw_induct;
436 val elims = map (atomize_induct ctxt) elims;
437 val intrs = map atomize_intr intrs;
438 val monos = InductivePackage.get_monos ctxt;
439 val intrs' = InductivePackage.unpartition_rules intrs
440 (map (fn (((s, ths), (_, k)), th) =>
441 (s, ths ~~ InductivePackage.infer_intro_vars th k ths))
442 (InductivePackage.partition_rules raw_induct intrs ~~
443 InductivePackage.arities_of raw_induct ~~ elims));
444 val atoms' = NominalAtoms.atoms_of thy;
446 if null xatoms then atoms' else
447 let val atoms = map (Sign.intern_type thy) xatoms
449 (case duplicates op = atoms of
451 | xs => error ("Duplicate atoms: " ^ commas xs);
452 case atoms \\ atoms' of
454 | xs => error ("No such atoms: " ^ commas xs);
457 val perm_pi_simp = PureThy.get_thms thy (Name "perm_pi_simp");
458 val eqvt_ss = HOL_basic_ss addsimps
459 (NominalThmDecls.get_eqvt_thms ctxt @ perm_pi_simp) addsimprocs
460 [mk_perm_bool_simproc names];
461 val t = Logic.unvarify (concl_of raw_induct);
462 val pi = Name.variant (add_term_names (t, [])) "pi";
463 val ps = map (fst o HOLogic.dest_imp)
464 (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop t));
465 fun eqvt_tac th pi (intr, vs) st =
467 fun eqvt_err s = error
468 ("Could not prove equivariance for introduction rule\n" ^
469 Sign.string_of_term (theory_of_thm intr)
470 (Logic.unvarify (prop_of intr)) ^ "\n" ^ s);
471 val res = SUBPROOF (fn {prems, params, ...} =>
473 val prems' = map (fn th => the_default th (map_thm ctxt
474 (split_conj (K I) names) (etac conjunct2 1) monos NONE th)) prems;
475 val prems'' = map (fn th' =>
476 Simplifier.simplify eqvt_ss (th' RS th)) prems';
477 val intr' = Drule.cterm_instantiate (map (cterm_of thy) vs ~~
478 map (cterm_of thy o NominalPackage.mk_perm [] pi o term_of) params)
480 in (rtac intr' THEN_ALL_NEW (TRY o resolve_tac prems'')) 1
483 case (Seq.pull res handle THM (s, _, _) => eqvt_err s) of
484 NONE => eqvt_err ("Rule does not match goal\n" ^
485 Sign.string_of_term (theory_of_thm st) (hd (prems_of st)))
486 | SOME (th, _) => Seq.single th
488 val thss = map (fn atom =>
490 val pi' = Free (pi, NominalAtoms.mk_permT (Type (atom, [])));
491 val perm_boolI' = Drule.cterm_instantiate
492 [(perm_boolI_pi, cterm_of thy pi')] perm_boolI
493 in map (fn th => zero_var_indexes (th RS mp))
494 (DatatypeAux.split_conj_thm (Goal.prove_global thy [] []
495 (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (foldr1 HOLogic.mk_conj (map (fn p =>
496 HOLogic.mk_imp (p, list_comb
497 (apsnd (map (NominalPackage.mk_perm [] pi')) (strip_comb p)))) ps)))
498 (fn _ => EVERY (rtac raw_induct 1 :: map (fn intr_vs =>
499 full_simp_tac eqvt_ss 1 THEN
500 eqvt_tac perm_boolI' pi' intr_vs) intrs'))))
503 fold (fn (name, ths) =>
504 Sign.add_path (Sign.base_name name) #>
505 PureThy.add_thmss [(("eqvt", ths), [NominalThmDecls.eqvt_add])] #> snd #>
506 Sign.parent_path) (names ~~ transp thss) thy
512 local structure P = OuterParse and K = OuterKeyword in
514 val _ = OuterSyntax.keywords ["avoids"];
517 OuterSyntax.command "nominal_inductive"
518 "prove equivariance and strong induction theorem for inductive predicate involving nominal datatypes" K.thy_goal
519 (P.name -- Scan.optional (P.$$$ "avoids" |-- P.and_list1 (P.name --
520 (P.$$$ ":" |-- Scan.repeat1 P.name))) [] >> (fn (name, avoids) =>
521 Toplevel.print o Toplevel.theory_to_proof (prove_strong_ind name avoids)));
524 OuterSyntax.command "equivariance"
525 "prove equivariance for inductive predicate involving nominal datatypes" K.thy_decl
526 (P.name -- Scan.optional (P.$$$ "[" |-- P.list1 P.name --| P.$$$ "]") [] >>
527 (fn (name, atoms) => Toplevel.theory (prove_eqvt name atoms)));