1 (* Title: Pure/logic.ML
3 Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
4 Copyright Cambridge University 1992
6 Abstract syntax operations of the Pure meta-logic.
13 val is_all : term -> bool
14 val mk_equals : term * term -> term
15 val dest_equals : term -> term * term
16 val is_equals : term -> bool
17 val mk_implies : term * term -> term
18 val dest_implies : term -> term * term
19 val is_implies : term -> bool
20 val list_implies : term list * term -> term
21 val strip_imp_prems : term -> term list
22 val strip_imp_concl : term -> term
23 val strip_prems : int * term list * term -> term list * term
24 val count_prems : term * int -> int
25 val mk_conjunction : term * term -> term
26 val mk_conjunction_list: term list -> term
27 val mk_flexpair : term * term -> term
28 val dest_flexpair : term -> term * term
29 val list_flexpairs : (term*term)list * term -> term
30 val rule_of : (term*term)list * term list * term -> term
31 val strip_flexpairs : term -> (term*term)list * term
32 val skip_flexpairs : term -> term
33 val strip_horn : term -> (term*term)list * term list * term
34 val mk_cond_defpair : term list -> term * term -> string * term
35 val mk_defpair : term * term -> string * term
36 val mk_type : typ -> term
37 val dest_type : term -> typ
38 val mk_inclass : typ * class -> term
39 val dest_inclass : term -> typ * class
41 val mk_goal : term -> term
42 val dest_goal : term -> term
43 val occs : term * term -> bool
44 val close_form : term -> term
45 val incr_indexes : typ list * int -> term -> term
46 val lift_fns : term * int -> (term -> term) * (term -> term)
47 val strip_assums_hyp : term -> term list
48 val strip_assums_concl: term -> term
49 val strip_params : term -> (string * typ) list
50 val has_meta_prems : term -> int -> bool
51 val flatten_params : int -> term -> term
52 val auto_rename : bool ref
53 val set_rename_prefix : string -> unit
54 val list_rename_params: string list * term -> term
55 val assum_pairs : term -> (term*term)list
56 val varify : term -> term
57 val unvarify : term -> term
60 structure Logic : LOGIC =
64 (*** Abstract syntax operations on the meta-connectives ***)
68 fun is_all (Const ("all", _) $ _) = true
74 (*Make an equality. DOES NOT CHECK TYPE OF u*)
75 fun mk_equals(t,u) = equals(fastype_of t) $ t $ u;
77 fun dest_equals (Const("==",_) $ t $ u) = (t,u)
78 | dest_equals t = raise TERM("dest_equals", [t]);
80 fun is_equals (Const ("==", _) $ _ $ _) = true
81 | is_equals _ = false;
86 fun mk_implies(A,B) = implies $ A $ B;
88 fun dest_implies (Const("==>",_) $ A $ B) = (A,B)
89 | dest_implies A = raise TERM("dest_implies", [A]);
91 fun is_implies (Const ("==>", _) $ _ $ _) = true
92 | is_implies _ = false;
95 (** nested implications **)
97 (* [A1,...,An], B goes to A1==>...An==>B *)
98 fun list_implies ([], B) = B : term
99 | list_implies (A::AS, B) = implies $ A $ list_implies(AS,B);
101 (* A1==>...An==>B goes to [A1,...,An], where B is not an implication *)
102 fun strip_imp_prems (Const("==>", _) $ A $ B) = A :: strip_imp_prems B
103 | strip_imp_prems _ = [];
105 (* A1==>...An==>B goes to B, where B is not an implication *)
106 fun strip_imp_concl (Const("==>", _) $ A $ B) = strip_imp_concl B
107 | strip_imp_concl A = A : term;
109 (*Strip and return premises: (i, [], A1==>...Ai==>B)
110 goes to ([Ai, A(i-1),...,A1] , B) (REVERSED)
111 if i<0 or else i too big then raises TERM*)
112 fun strip_prems (0, As, B) = (As, B)
113 | strip_prems (i, As, Const("==>", _) $ A $ B) =
114 strip_prems (i-1, A::As, B)
115 | strip_prems (_, As, A) = raise TERM("strip_prems", A::As);
117 (*Count premises -- quicker than (length ostrip_prems) *)
118 fun count_prems (Const("==>", _) $ A $ B, n) = count_prems (B,n+1)
119 | count_prems (_,n) = n;
124 fun mk_conjunction (t, u) =
125 Term.list_all ([("C", propT)], mk_implies (list_implies ([t, u], Bound 0), Bound 0));
127 fun mk_conjunction_list [] = Term.all propT $ Abs ("dummy", propT, mk_implies (Bound 0, Bound 0))
128 | mk_conjunction_list ts = foldr1 mk_conjunction ts;
131 (** flex-flex constraints **)
133 (*Make a constraint.*)
134 fun mk_flexpair(t,u) = flexpair(fastype_of t) $ t $ u;
136 fun dest_flexpair (Const("=?=",_) $ t $ u) = (t,u)
137 | dest_flexpair t = raise TERM("dest_flexpair", [t]);
139 (*make flexflex antecedents: ( [(a1,b1),...,(an,bn)] , C )
140 goes to (a1=?=b1) ==>...(an=?=bn)==>C *)
141 fun list_flexpairs ([], A) = A
142 | list_flexpairs ((t,u)::pairs, A) =
143 implies $ (mk_flexpair(t,u)) $ list_flexpairs(pairs,A);
145 (*Make the object-rule tpairs==>As==>B *)
146 fun rule_of (tpairs, As, B) = list_flexpairs(tpairs, list_implies(As, B));
148 (*Remove and return flexflex pairs:
149 (a1=?=b1)==>...(an=?=bn)==>C to ( [(a1,b1),...,(an,bn)] , C )
150 [Tail recursive in order to return a pair of results] *)
151 fun strip_flex_aux (pairs, Const("==>", _) $ (Const("=?=",_)$t$u) $ C) =
152 strip_flex_aux ((t,u)::pairs, C)
153 | strip_flex_aux (pairs,C) = (rev pairs, C);
155 fun strip_flexpairs A = strip_flex_aux([], A);
157 (*Discard flexflex pairs*)
158 fun skip_flexpairs (Const("==>", _) $ (Const("=?=",_)$_$_) $ C) =
160 | skip_flexpairs C = C;
162 (*strip a proof state (Horn clause):
163 (a1==b1)==>...(am==bm)==>B1==>...Bn==>C
164 goes to ( [(a1,b1),...,(am,bm)] , [B1,...,Bn] , C) *)
166 let val (tpairs,horn) = strip_flexpairs A
167 in (tpairs, strip_imp_prems horn, strip_imp_concl horn) end;
172 fun mk_cond_defpair As (lhs, rhs) =
173 (case Term.head_of lhs of
175 (Sign.base_name name ^ "_def", list_implies (As, mk_equals (lhs, rhs)))
176 | _ => raise TERM ("Malformed definition: head of lhs not a constant", [lhs, rhs]));
178 fun mk_defpair lhs_rhs = mk_cond_defpair [] lhs_rhs;
181 (** types as terms **)
183 fun mk_type ty = Const ("TYPE", itselfT ty);
185 fun dest_type (Const ("TYPE", Type ("itself", [ty]))) = ty
186 | dest_type t = raise TERM ("dest_type", [t]);
189 (** class constraints **)
191 fun mk_inclass (ty, c) =
192 Const (Sign.const_of_class c, itselfT ty --> propT) $ mk_type ty;
194 fun dest_inclass (t as Const (c_class, _) $ ty) =
195 ((dest_type ty, Sign.class_of_const c_class)
196 handle TERM _ => raise TERM ("dest_inclass", [t]))
197 | dest_inclass t = raise TERM ("dest_inclass", [t]);
202 val goal_const = Const ("Goal", propT --> propT);
203 fun mk_goal t = goal_const $ t;
205 fun dest_goal (Const ("Goal", _) $ t) = t
206 | dest_goal t = raise TERM ("dest_goal", [t]);
209 (*** Low-level term operations ***)
211 (*Does t occur in u? Or is alpha-convertible to u?
212 The term t must contain no loose bound variables*)
213 fun t occs u = exists_subterm (fn s => t aconv s) u;
215 (*Close up a formula over all free variables by quantification*)
217 list_all_free (sort_wrt fst (map dest_Free (term_frees A)), A);
220 (*** Specialized operations for resolution... ***)
222 (*For all variables in the term, increment indexnames and lift over the Us
223 result is ?Gidx(B.(lev+n-1),...,B.lev) where lev is abstraction level *)
224 fun incr_indexes (Us: typ list, inc:int) t =
225 let fun incr (Var ((a,i), T), lev) =
226 Unify.combound (Var((a, i+inc), Us---> incr_tvar inc T),
228 | incr (Abs (a,T,body), lev) =
229 Abs (a, incr_tvar inc T, incr(body,lev+1))
230 | incr (Const(a,T),_) = Const(a, incr_tvar inc T)
231 | incr (Free(a,T),_) = Free(a, incr_tvar inc T)
232 | incr (f$t, lev) = incr(f,lev) $ incr(t,lev)
236 (*Make lifting functions from subgoal and increment.
237 lift_abs operates on tpairs (unification constraints)
238 lift_all operates on propositions *)
239 fun lift_fns (B,inc) =
240 let fun lift_abs (Us, Const("==>", _) $ _ $ B) u = lift_abs (Us,B) u
241 | lift_abs (Us, Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t)) u =
242 Abs(a, T, lift_abs (T::Us, t) u)
243 | lift_abs (Us, _) u = incr_indexes(rev Us, inc) u
244 fun lift_all (Us, Const("==>", _) $ A $ B) u =
245 implies $ A $ lift_all (Us,B) u
246 | lift_all (Us, Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t)) u =
247 all T $ Abs(a, T, lift_all (T::Us,t) u)
248 | lift_all (Us, _) u = incr_indexes(rev Us, inc) u;
249 in (lift_abs([],B), lift_all([],B)) end;
251 (*Strips assumptions in goal, yielding list of hypotheses. *)
252 fun strip_assums_hyp (Const("==>", _) $ H $ B) = H :: strip_assums_hyp B
253 | strip_assums_hyp (Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t)) = strip_assums_hyp t
254 | strip_assums_hyp B = [];
256 (*Strips assumptions in goal, yielding conclusion. *)
257 fun strip_assums_concl (Const("==>", _) $ H $ B) = strip_assums_concl B
258 | strip_assums_concl (Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t)) = strip_assums_concl t
259 | strip_assums_concl B = B;
261 (*Make a list of all the parameters in a subgoal, even if nested*)
262 fun strip_params (Const("==>", _) $ H $ B) = strip_params B
263 | strip_params (Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t)) = (a,T) :: strip_params t
264 | strip_params B = [];
266 (*test for meta connectives in prems of a 'subgoal'*)
267 fun has_meta_prems prop i =
269 fun is_meta (Const ("==>", _) $ _ $ _) = true
270 | is_meta (Const ("==", _) $ _ $ _) = true
271 | is_meta (Const ("all", _) $ _) = true
273 val horn = skip_flexpairs prop;
275 (case strip_prems (i, [], horn) of
276 (B :: _, _) => exists is_meta (strip_assums_hyp B)
277 | _ => false) handle TERM _ => false
280 (*Removes the parameters from a subgoal and renumber bvars in hypotheses,
281 where j is the total number of parameters (precomputed)
282 If n>0 then deletes assumption n. *)
283 fun remove_params j n A =
284 if j=0 andalso n<=0 then A (*nothing left to do...*)
286 Const("==>", _) $ H $ B =>
287 if n=1 then (remove_params j (n-1) B)
288 else implies $ (incr_boundvars j H) $ (remove_params j (n-1) B)
289 | Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t) => remove_params (j-1) n t
290 | _ => if n>0 then raise TERM("remove_params", [A])
293 (** Auto-renaming of parameters in subgoals **)
295 val auto_rename = ref false
296 and rename_prefix = ref "ka";
298 (*rename_prefix is not exported; it is set by this function.*)
299 fun set_rename_prefix a =
300 if a<>"" andalso forall Symbol.is_letter (Symbol.explode a)
301 then (rename_prefix := a; auto_rename := true)
302 else error"rename prefix must be nonempty and consist of letters";
304 (*Makes parameters in a goal have distinctive names (not guaranteed unique!)
305 A name clash could cause the printer to rename bound vars;
306 then res_inst_tac would not work properly.*)
307 fun rename_vars (a, []) = []
308 | rename_vars (a, (_,T)::vars) =
309 (a,T) :: rename_vars (Symbol.bump_string a, vars);
311 (*Move all parameters to the front of the subgoal, renaming them apart;
312 if n>0 then deletes assumption n. *)
313 fun flatten_params n A =
314 let val params = strip_params A;
315 val vars = if !auto_rename
316 then rename_vars (!rename_prefix, params)
317 else ListPair.zip (variantlist(map #1 params,[]),
319 in list_all (vars, remove_params (length vars) n A)
322 (*Makes parameters in a goal have the names supplied by the list cs.*)
323 fun list_rename_params (cs, Const("==>", _) $ A $ B) =
324 implies $ A $ list_rename_params (cs, B)
325 | list_rename_params (c::cs, Const("all",_)$Abs(_,T,t)) =
326 all T $ Abs(c, T, list_rename_params (cs, t))
327 | list_rename_params (cs, B) = B;
329 (*Strips assumptions in goal yielding ( [HPn,...,HP1], [xm,...,x1], B ).
330 Where HPi has the form (Hi,nparams_i) and x1...xm are the parameters.
331 We need nparams_i only when the parameters aren't flattened; then we
332 must call incr_boundvars to make up the difference. See assum_pairs.
333 Without this refinement we can get the wrong answer, e.g. by
334 Goal "!!f. EX B. Q(f,B) ==> (!!y. P(f,y))";
337 fun strip_assums_aux (HPs, params, Const("==>", _) $ H $ B) =
338 strip_assums_aux ((H,length params)::HPs, params, B)
339 | strip_assums_aux (HPs, params, Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t)) =
340 strip_assums_aux (HPs, (a,T)::params, t)
341 | strip_assums_aux (HPs, params, B) = (HPs, params, B);
343 fun strip_assums A = strip_assums_aux ([],[],A);
346 (*Produces disagreement pairs, one for each assumption proof, in order.
347 A is the first premise of the lifted rule, and thus has the form
348 H1 ==> ... Hk ==> B and the pairs are (H1,B),...,(Hk,B) *)
350 let val (HPs, params, B) = strip_assums A
351 val nparams = length params
352 val D = Unify.rlist_abs(params, B)
354 Unify.rlist_abs(params, incr_boundvars (nparams-np) H)
355 fun pairrev ([],pairs) = pairs
356 | pairrev ((H,np)::HPs, pairs) =
357 pairrev(HPs, (incr_hyp(H,np),D) :: pairs)
361 (*Converts Frees to Vars and TFrees to TVars so that axioms can be written
362 without (?) everywhere*)
363 fun varify (Const(a,T)) = Const(a, Type.varifyT T)
364 | varify (Free(a,T)) = Var((a,0), Type.varifyT T)
365 | varify (Var(ixn,T)) = Var(ixn, Type.varifyT T)
366 | varify (Abs (a,T,body)) = Abs (a, Type.varifyT T, varify body)
367 | varify (f$t) = varify f $ varify t
370 (*Inverse of varify. Converts axioms back to their original form.*)
371 fun unvarify (Const(a,T)) = Const(a, Type.unvarifyT T)
372 | unvarify (Var((a,0), T)) = Free(a, Type.unvarifyT T)
373 | unvarify (Var(ixn,T)) = Var(ixn, Type.unvarifyT T) (*non-0 index!*)
374 | unvarify (Abs (a,T,body)) = Abs (a, Type.unvarifyT T, unvarify body)
375 | unvarify (f$t) = unvarify f $ unvarify t