%% $Id$

 \chapter{Syntax Transformations} \label{chap:syntax}

 \newcommand\ttapp{\mathrel{\hbox{\tt\$}}}

 \newcommand\mtt[1]{\mbox{\tt #1}}

 \newcommand\ttfct[1]{\mathop{\mtt{#1}}\nolimits}

 \newcommand\Constant{\ttfct{Constant}}

 \newcommand\Variable{\ttfct{Variable}}

 \newcommand\Appl[1]{\ttfct{Appl}\,[#1]}

 \index{syntax!transformations|(}

 This chapter is intended for experienced Isabelle users who need to define

 macros or code their own translation functions.  It describes the

 transformations between parse trees, abstract syntax trees and terms.

 \section{Abstract syntax trees} \label{sec:asts}

 \index{ASTs|(}

 The parser, given a token list from the lexer, applies productions to yield

 a parse tree\index{parse trees}.  By applying some internal transformations

 the parse tree becomes an abstract syntax tree, or \AST{}.  Macro

 expansion, further translations and finally type inference yields a

 well-typed term.  The printing process is the reverse, except for some

 subtleties to be discussed later.

 Figure~\ref{fig:parse_print} outlines the parsing and printing process.

 Much of the complexity is due to the macro mechanism.  Using macros, you

 can specify most forms of concrete syntax without writing any \ML{} code.

 \begin{figure}

 \begin{center}

 \begin{tabular}{cl}

 string          & \\

 $\downarrow$    & lexer, parser \\

 parse tree      & \\

 $\downarrow$    & parse \AST{} translation \\

 \AST{}             & \\

 $\downarrow$    & \AST{} rewriting (macros) \\

 \AST{}             & \\

 $\downarrow$    & parse translation, type inference \\

 --- well-typed term --- & \\

 $\downarrow$    & print translation \\

 \AST{}             & \\

 $\downarrow$    & \AST{} rewriting (macros) \\

 \AST{}             & \\

 $\downarrow$    & print \AST{} translation, token translation \\

 string          &

 \end{tabular}

 \end{center}

 \caption{Parsing and printing}\label{fig:parse_print}

 \end{figure}

 Abstract syntax trees are an intermediate form between the raw parse trees

 and the typed $\lambda$-terms.  An \AST{} is either an atom (constant or

 variable) or a list of {\em at least two\/} subtrees.  Internally, they

 have type \mltydx{Syntax.ast}: \index{*Constant} \index{*Variable}

 \index{*Appl}

 \begin{ttbox}

 datatype ast = Constant of string

              | Variable of string

              | Appl of ast list

 \end{ttbox}

 %

 Isabelle uses an S-expression syntax for abstract syntax trees.  Constant

 atoms are shown as quoted strings, variable atoms as non-quoted strings and

 applications as a parenthesised list of subtrees.  For example, the \AST

 \begin{ttbox}

 Appl [Constant "_constrain",

       Appl [Constant "_abs", Variable "x", Variable "t"],

       Appl [Constant "fun", Variable "'a", Variable "'b"]]

 \end{ttbox}

 is shown as {\tt ("_constrain" ("_abs" x t) ("fun" 'a 'b))}.

 Both {\tt ()} and {\tt (f)} are illegal because they have too few

 subtrees.

 The resemblance to Lisp's S-expressions is intentional, but there are two

 kinds of atomic symbols: $\Constant x$ and $\Variable x$.  Do not take the

 names {\tt Constant} and {\tt Variable} too literally; in the later

 translation to terms, $\Variable x$ may become a constant, free or bound

 variable, even a type constructor or class name; the actual outcome depends

 on the context.

 Similarly, you can think of ${\tt (} f~x@1~\ldots~x@n{\tt )}$ as the

 application of~$f$ to the arguments $x@1, \ldots, x@n$.  But the kind of

 application is determined later by context; it could be a type constructor

 applied to types.

 Forms like {\tt (("_abs" x $t$) $u$)} are legal, but \AST{}s are

 first-order: the {\tt "_abs"} does not bind the {\tt x} in any way.  Later

 at the term level, {\tt ("_abs" x $t$)} will become an {\tt Abs} node and

 occurrences of {\tt x} in $t$ will be replaced by bound variables (the term

 constructor \ttindex{Bound}).

 \section{Transforming parse trees to ASTs}\label{sec:astofpt}

 \index{ASTs!made from parse trees}

 \newcommand\astofpt[1]{\lbrakk#1\rbrakk}

 The parse tree is the raw output of the parser.  Translation functions,

 called {\bf parse AST translations}\indexbold{translations!parse AST},

 transform the parse tree into an abstract syntax tree.

 The parse tree is constructed by nesting the right-hand sides of the

 productions used to recognize the input.  Such parse trees are simply lists

 of tokens and constituent parse trees, the latter representing the

 nonterminals of the productions.  Let us refer to the actual productions in

 the form displayed by {\tt print_syntax} (see \S\ref{sec:inspct-thy} for an

 example).

 Ignoring parse \AST{} translations, parse trees are transformed to \AST{}s

 by stripping out delimiters and copy productions.  More precisely, the

 mapping $\astofpt{-}$ is derived from the productions as follows:

 \begin{itemize}

 \item Name tokens: $\astofpt{t} = \Variable s$, where $t$ is an \ndx{id},

   \ndx{var}, \ndx{tid}, \ndx{tvar}, \ndx{xnum} or \ndx{xstr} token, and $s$

   its associated string.  Note that for {\tt xstr} this does not include the

   quotes.

 \item Copy productions:\index{productions!copy}

   $\astofpt{\ldots P \ldots} = \astofpt{P}$.  Here $\ldots$ stands for

   strings of delimiters, which are discarded.  $P$ stands for the single

   constituent that is not a delimiter; it is either a nonterminal symbol or

   a name token.

   \item 0-ary productions: $\astofpt{\ldots \mtt{=>} c} = \Constant c$.

     Here there are no constituents other than delimiters, which are

     discarded.

   \item $n$-ary productions, where $n \ge 1$: delimiters are discarded and

     the remaining constituents $P@1$, \ldots, $P@n$ are built into an

     application whose head constant is~$c$:

     \[ \astofpt{\ldots P@1 \ldots P@n \ldots \mtt{=>} c} =

        \Appl{\Constant c, \astofpt{P@1}, \ldots, \astofpt{P@n}}

     \]

 \end{itemize}

 Figure~\ref{fig:parse_ast} presents some simple examples, where {\tt ==},

 {\tt _appl}, {\tt _args}, and so forth name productions of the Pure syntax.

 These examples illustrate the need for further translations to make \AST{}s

 closer to the typed $\lambda$-calculus.  The Pure syntax provides

 predefined parse \AST{} translations\index{translations!parse AST} for

 ordinary applications, type applications, nested abstractions, meta

 implications and function types.  Figure~\ref{fig:parse_ast_tr} shows their

 effect on some representative input strings.

 \begin{figure}

 \begin{center}

 \tt\begin{tabular}{ll}

 \rm input string    & \rm \AST \\\hline

 "f"                 & f \\

 "'a"                & 'a \\

 "t == u"            & ("==" t u) \\

 "f(x)"              & ("_appl" f x) \\

 "f(x, y)"           & ("_appl" f ("_args" x y)) \\

 "f(x, y, z)"        & ("_appl" f ("_args" x ("_args" y z))) \\

 "\%x y.\ t"         & ("_lambda" ("_idts" x y) t) \\

 \end{tabular}

 \end{center}

 \caption{Parsing examples using the Pure syntax}\label{fig:parse_ast}

 \end{figure}

 \begin{figure}

 \begin{center}

 \tt\begin{tabular}{ll}

 \rm input string            & \rm \AST{} \\\hline

 "f(x, y, z)"                & (f x y z) \\

 "'a ty"                     & (ty 'a) \\

 "('a, 'b) ty"               & (ty 'a 'b) \\

 "\%x y z.\ t"               & ("_abs" x ("_abs" y ("_abs" z t))) \\

 "\%x ::\ 'a.\ t"            & ("_abs" ("_constrain" x 'a) t) \\

 "[| P; Q; R |] => S"        & ("==>" P ("==>" Q ("==>" R S))) \\

 "['a, 'b, 'c] => 'd"        & ("fun" 'a ("fun" 'b ("fun" 'c 'd)))

 \end{tabular}

 \end{center}

 \caption{Built-in parse \AST{} translations}\label{fig:parse_ast_tr}

 \end{figure}

 The names of constant heads in the \AST{} control the translation process.

 The list of constants invoking parse \AST{} translations appears in the

 output of {\tt print_syntax} under {\tt parse_ast_translation}.

 \section{Transforming ASTs to terms}\label{sec:termofast}

 \index{terms!made from ASTs}

 \newcommand\termofast[1]{\lbrakk#1\rbrakk}

 The \AST{}, after application of macros (see \S\ref{sec:macros}), is

 transformed into a term.  This term is probably ill-typed since type

 inference has not occurred yet.  The term may contain type constraints

 consisting of applications with head {\tt "_constrain"}; the second

 argument is a type encoded as a term.  Type inference later introduces

 correct types or rejects the input.

 Another set of translation functions, namely parse

 translations\index{translations!parse}, may affect this process.  If we

 ignore parse translations for the time being, then \AST{}s are transformed

 to terms by mapping \AST{} constants to constants, \AST{} variables to

 schematic or free variables and \AST{} applications to applications.

 More precisely, the mapping $\termofast{-}$ is defined by

 \begin{itemize}

 \item Constants: $\termofast{\Constant x} = \ttfct{Const} (x,

   \mtt{dummyT})$.

 \item Schematic variables: $\termofast{\Variable \mtt{"?}xi\mtt"} =

   \ttfct{Var} ((x, i), \mtt{dummyT})$, where $x$ is the base name and $i$

   the index extracted from~$xi$.

 \item Free variables: $\termofast{\Variable x} = \ttfct{Free} (x,

   \mtt{dummyT})$.

 \item Function applications with $n$ arguments:

     \[ \termofast{\Appl{f, x@1, \ldots, x@n}} =

        \termofast{f} \ttapp

          \termofast{x@1} \ttapp \ldots \ttapp \termofast{x@n}

     \]

 \end{itemize}

 Here \ttindex{Const}, \ttindex{Var}, \ttindex{Free} and

 \verb|$|\index{$@{\tt\$}} are constructors of the datatype \mltydx{term},

 while \ttindex{dummyT} stands for some dummy type that is ignored during

 type inference.

 So far the outcome is still a first-order term.  Abstractions and bound

 variables (constructors \ttindex{Abs} and \ttindex{Bound}) are introduced

 by parse translations.  Such translations are attached to {\tt "_abs"},

 {\tt "!!"} and user-defined binders.

 \section{Printing of terms}

 \newcommand\astofterm[1]{\lbrakk#1\rbrakk}\index{ASTs!made from terms}

 The output phase is essentially the inverse of the input phase.  Terms are

 translated via abstract syntax trees into strings.  Finally the strings are

 pretty printed.

 Print translations (\S\ref{sec:tr_funs}) may affect the transformation of

 terms into \AST{}s.  Ignoring those, the transformation maps

 term constants, variables and applications to the corresponding constructs

 on \AST{}s.  Abstractions are mapped to applications of the special

 constant {\tt _abs}.

 More precisely, the mapping $\astofterm{-}$ is defined as follows:

 \begin{itemize}

   \item $\astofterm{\ttfct{Const} (x, \tau)} = \Constant x$.

   \item $\astofterm{\ttfct{Free} (x, \tau)} = constrain (\Variable x,

     \tau)$.

   \item $\astofterm{\ttfct{Var} ((x, i), \tau)} = constrain (\Variable

     \mtt{"?}xi\mtt", \tau)$, where $\mtt?xi$ is the string representation of

     the {\tt indexname} $(x, i)$.

   \item For the abstraction $\lambda x::\tau.t$, let $x'$ be a variant

     of~$x$ renamed to differ from all names occurring in~$t$, and let $t'$

     be obtained from~$t$ by replacing all bound occurrences of~$x$ by

     the free variable $x'$.  This replaces corresponding occurrences of the

     constructor \ttindex{Bound} by the term $\ttfct{Free} (x',

     \mtt{dummyT})$:

    \[ \astofterm{\ttfct{Abs} (x, \tau, t)} =

       \Appl{\Constant \mtt{"_abs"},

         constrain(\Variable x', \tau), \astofterm{t'}}

     \]

   \item $\astofterm{\ttfct{Bound} i} = \Variable \mtt{"B.}i\mtt"$.

     The occurrence of constructor \ttindex{Bound} should never happen

     when printing well-typed terms; it indicates a de Bruijn index with no

     matching abstraction.

   \item Where $f$ is not an application,

     \[ \astofterm{f \ttapp x@1 \ttapp \ldots \ttapp x@n} =

        \Appl{\astofterm{f}, \astofterm{x@1}, \ldots,\astofterm{x@n}}

     \]

 \end{itemize}

 %

 Type constraints\index{type constraints} are inserted to allow the printing

 of types.  This is governed by the boolean variable \ttindex{show_types}:

 \begin{itemize}

   \item $constrain(x, \tau) = x$ \ if $\tau = \mtt{dummyT}$ \index{*dummyT} or

     \ttindex{show_types} is set to {\tt false}.

   \item $constrain(x, \tau) = \Appl{\Constant \mtt{"_constrain"}, x,

          \astofterm{\tau}}$ \ otherwise.

     Here, $\astofterm{\tau}$ is the \AST{} encoding of $\tau$: type

     constructors go to {\tt Constant}s; type identifiers go to {\tt

       Variable}s; type applications go to {\tt Appl}s with the type

     constructor as the first element.  If \ttindex{show_sorts} is set to

     {\tt true}, some type variables are decorated with an \AST{} encoding

     of their sort.

 \end{itemize}

 %

 The \AST{}, after application of macros (see \S\ref{sec:macros}), is

 transformed into the final output string.  The built-in {\bf print AST

   translations}\indexbold{translations!print AST} reverse the

 parse \AST{} translations of Fig.\ts\ref{fig:parse_ast_tr}.

 For the actual printing process, the names attached to productions

 of the form $\ldots A^{(p@1)}@1 \ldots A^{(p@n)}@n \ldots \mtt{=>} c$ play

 a vital role.  Each \AST{} with constant head $c$, namely $\mtt"c\mtt"$ or

 $(\mtt"c\mtt"~ x@1 \ldots x@n)$, is printed according to the production

 for~$c$.  Each argument~$x@i$ is converted to a string, and put in

 parentheses if its priority~$(p@i)$ requires this.  The resulting strings

 and their syntactic sugar (denoted by \dots{} above) are joined to make a

 single string.

 If an application $(\mtt"c\mtt"~ x@1 \ldots x@m)$ has more arguments

 than the corresponding production, it is first split into

 $((\mtt"c\mtt"~ x@1 \ldots x@n) ~ x@{n+1} \ldots x@m)$.  Applications

 with too few arguments or with non-constant head or without a

 corresponding production are printed as $f(x@1, \ldots, x@l)$ or

 $(\alpha@1, \ldots, \alpha@l) ty$.  Multiple productions associated

 with some name $c$ are tried in order of appearance.  An occurrence of

 $\Variable x$ is simply printed as~$x$.

 Blanks are {\em not\/} inserted automatically.  If blanks are required to

 separate tokens, specify them in the mixfix declaration, possibly preceded

 by a slash~({\tt/}) to allow a line break.

 \index{ASTs|)}

 \section{Macros: syntactic rewriting} \label{sec:macros}

 \index{macros|(}\index{rewriting!syntactic|(}

 Mixfix declarations alone can handle situations where there is a direct

 connection between the concrete syntax and the underlying term.  Sometimes

 we require a more elaborate concrete syntax, such as quantifiers and list

 notation.  Isabelle's {\bf macros} and {\bf translation functions} can

 perform translations such as

 \begin{center}\tt

   \begin{tabular}{r@{$\quad\protect\rightleftharpoons\quad$}l}

     ALL x:A.P   & Ball(A, \%x.P)        \\ \relax

     [x, y, z]   & Cons(x, Cons(y, Cons(z, Nil)))

   \end{tabular}

 \end{center}

 Translation functions (see \S\ref{sec:tr_funs}) must be coded in ML; they

 are the most powerful translation mechanism but are difficult to read or

 write.  Macros are specified by first-order rewriting systems that operate

 on abstract syntax trees.  They are usually easy to read and write, and can

 express all but the most obscure translations.

 Figure~\ref{fig:set_trans} defines a fragment of first-order logic and

 set theory.\footnote{This and the following theories are complete

   working examples, though they specify only syntax, no axioms.  The

   file {\tt ZF/ZF.thy} presents a full set theory definition,

   including many macro rules.} Theory {\tt SetSyntax} declares

 constants for set comprehension ({\tt Collect}), replacement ({\tt

   Replace}) and bounded universal quantification ({\tt Ball}).  Each

 of these binds some variables.  Without additional syntax we should

 have to write $\forall x \in A.  P$ as {\tt Ball(A,\%x.P)}, and

 similarly for the others.

 \begin{figure}

 \begin{ttbox}

 SetSyntax = Pure +

 types

   i o

 arities

   i, o :: logic

 consts

   Trueprop      :: o => prop                ("_" 5)

   Collect       :: [i, i => o] => i

   Replace       :: [i, [i, i] => o] => i

   Ball          :: [i, i => o] => o

 syntax

   "{\at}Collect"    :: [idt, i, o] => i         ("(1{\ttlbrace}_:_./ _{\ttrbrace})")

   "{\at}Replace"    :: [idt, idt, i, o] => i    ("(1{\ttlbrace}_./ _:_, _{\ttrbrace})")

   "{\at}Ball"       :: [idt, i, o] => o         ("(3ALL _:_./ _)" 10)

 translations

   "{\ttlbrace}x:A. P{\ttrbrace}"    == "Collect(A, \%x. P)"

   "{\ttlbrace}y. x:A, Q{\ttrbrace}" == "Replace(A, \%x y. Q)"

   "ALL x:A. P"  == "Ball(A, \%x. P)"

 end

 \end{ttbox}

 \caption{Macro example: set theory}\label{fig:set_trans}

 \end{figure}

 The theory specifies a variable-binding syntax through additional productions

 that have mixfix declarations.  Each non-copy production must specify some

 constant, which is used for building \AST{}s. \index{constants!syntactic} The

 additional constants are decorated with {\tt\at} to stress their purely

 syntactic purpose; they may not occur within the final well-typed terms,

 being declared as {\tt syntax} rather than {\tt consts}.

 The translations cause the replacement of external forms by internal forms

 after parsing, and vice versa before printing of terms.  As a specification

 of the set theory notation, they should be largely self-explanatory.  The

 syntactic constants, {\tt\at Collect}, {\tt\at Replace} and {\tt\at Ball},

 appear implicitly in the macro rules via their mixfix forms.

 Macros can define variable-binding syntax because they operate on \AST{}s,

 which have no inbuilt notion of bound variable.  The macro variables {\tt

   x} and~{\tt y} have type~{\tt idt} and therefore range over identifiers,

 in this case bound variables.  The macro variables {\tt P} and~{\tt Q}

 range over formulae containing bound variable occurrences.

 Other applications of the macro system can be less straightforward, and

 there are peculiarities.  The rest of this section will describe in detail

 how Isabelle macros are preprocessed and applied.

 \subsection{Specifying macros}

 Macros are basically rewrite rules on \AST{}s.  But unlike other macro

 systems found in programming languages, Isabelle's macros work in both

 directions.  Therefore a syntax contains two lists of rewrites: one for

 parsing and one for printing.

 \index{*translations section}

 The {\tt translations} section specifies macros.  The syntax for a macro is

 \[ (root)\; string \quad

    \left\{\begin{array}[c]{c} \mtt{=>} \\ \mtt{<=} \\ \mtt{==} \end{array}

    \right\} \quad

    (root)\; string

 \]

 %

 This specifies a parse rule ({\tt =>}), a print rule ({\tt <=}), or both

 ({\tt ==}).  The two strings specify the left and right-hand sides of the

 macro rule.  The $(root)$ specification is optional; it specifies the

 nonterminal for parsing the $string$ and if omitted defaults to {\tt

   logic}.  \AST{} rewrite rules $(l, r)$ must obey certain conditions:

 \begin{itemize}

 \item Rules must be left linear: $l$ must not contain repeated variables.

 \item Rules must have constant heads, namely $l = \mtt"c\mtt"$ or $l =

   (\mtt"c\mtt" ~ x@1 \ldots x@n)$.

 \item Every variable in~$r$ must also occur in~$l$.

 \end{itemize}

 Macro rules may refer to any syntax from the parent theories.  They

 may also refer to anything defined before the current {\tt

   translations} section --- including any mixfix declarations.

 Upon declaration, both sides of the macro rule undergo parsing and parse

 \AST{} translations (see \S\ref{sec:asts}), but do not themselves undergo

 macro expansion.  The lexer runs in a different mode that additionally

 accepts identifiers of the form $\_~letter~quasiletter^*$ (like {\tt _idt},

 {\tt _K}).  Thus, a constant whose name starts with an underscore can

 appear in macro rules but not in ordinary terms.

 Some atoms of the macro rule's \AST{} are designated as constants for

 matching.  These are all names that have been declared as classes, types or

 constants (logical and syntactic).

 The result of this preprocessing is two lists of macro rules, each

 stored as a pair of \AST{}s.  They can be viewed using {\tt

   print_syntax} (sections \ttindex{parse_rules} and

 \ttindex{print_rules}).  For theory~{\tt SetSyntax} of

 Fig.~\ref{fig:set_trans} these are

 \begin{ttbox}

 parse_rules:

   ("{\at}Collect" x A P)  ->  ("Collect" A ("_abs" x P))

   ("{\at}Replace" y x A Q)  ->  ("Replace" A ("_abs" x ("_abs" y Q)))

   ("{\at}Ball" x A P)  ->  ("Ball" A ("_abs" x P))

 print_rules:

   ("Collect" A ("_abs" x P))  ->  ("{\at}Collect" x A P)

   ("Replace" A ("_abs" x ("_abs" y Q)))  ->  ("{\at}Replace" y x A Q)

   ("Ball" A ("_abs" x P))  ->  ("{\at}Ball" x A P)

 \end{ttbox}

 \begin{warn}

   Avoid choosing variable names that have previously been used as

   constants, types or type classes; the {\tt consts} section in the output

   of {\tt print_syntax} lists all such names.  If a macro rule works

   incorrectly, inspect its internal form as shown above, recalling that

   constants appear as quoted strings and variables without quotes.

 \end{warn}

 \begin{warn}

 If \ttindex{eta_contract} is set to {\tt true}, terms will be

 $\eta$-contracted {\em before\/} the \AST{} rewriter sees them.  Thus some

 abstraction nodes needed for print rules to match may vanish.  For example,

 \verb|Ball(A, %x. P(x))| contracts to {\tt Ball(A, P)}; the print rule does

 not apply and the output will be {\tt Ball(A, P)}.  This problem would not

 occur if \ML{} translation functions were used instead of macros (as is

 done for binder declarations).

 \end{warn}

 \begin{warn}

 Another trap concerns type constraints.  If \ttindex{show_types} is set to

 {\tt true}, bound variables will be decorated by their meta types at the

 binding place (but not at occurrences in the body).  Matching with

 \verb|Collect(A, %x. P)| binds {\tt x} to something like {\tt ("_constrain" y

 "i")} rather than only {\tt y}.  \AST{} rewriting will cause the constraint to

 appear in the external form, say \verb|{y::i:A::i. P::o}|.

 To allow such constraints to be re-read, your syntax should specify bound

 variables using the nonterminal~\ndx{idt}.  This is the case in our

 example.  Choosing {\tt id} instead of {\tt idt} is a common error.

 \end{warn}

 \subsection{Applying rules}

 As a term is being parsed or printed, an \AST{} is generated as an

 intermediate form (recall Fig.\ts\ref{fig:parse_print}).  The \AST{} is

 normalised by applying macro rules in the manner of a traditional term

 rewriting system.  We first examine how a single rule is applied.

 Let $t$ be the abstract syntax tree to be normalised and $(l, r)$ some

 translation rule.  A subtree~$u$ of $t$ is a {\bf redex} if it is an

 instance of~$l$; in this case $l$ is said to {\bf match}~$u$.  A redex

 matched by $l$ may be replaced by the corresponding instance of~$r$, thus

 {\bf rewriting} the \AST~$t$.  Matching requires some notion of {\bf

   place-holders} that may occur in rule patterns but not in ordinary

 \AST{}s; {\tt Variable} atoms serve this purpose.

 The matching of the object~$u$ by the pattern~$l$ is performed as follows:

 \begin{itemize}

   \item Every constant matches itself.

   \item $\Variable x$ in the object matches $\Constant x$ in the pattern.

     This point is discussed further below.

   \item Every \AST{} in the object matches $\Variable x$ in the pattern,

     binding~$x$ to~$u$.

   \item One application matches another if they have the same number of

     subtrees and corresponding subtrees match.

   \item In every other case, matching fails.  In particular, {\tt

       Constant}~$x$ can only match itself.

 \end{itemize}

 A successful match yields a substitution that is applied to~$r$, generating

 the instance that replaces~$u$.

 The second case above may look odd.  This is where {\tt Variable}s of

 non-rule \AST{}s behave like {\tt Constant}s.  Recall that \AST{}s are not

 far removed from parse trees; at this level it is not yet known which

 identifiers will become constants, bounds, frees, types or classes.  As

 \S\ref{sec:asts} describes, former parse tree heads appear in \AST{}s as

 {\tt Constant}s, while the name tokens \ndx{id}, \ndx{var}, \ndx{tid},

 \ndx{tvar}, \ndx{xnum} and \ndx{xstr} become {\tt Variable}s.  On the other

 hand, when \AST{}s generated from terms for printing, all constants and type

 constructors become {\tt Constant}s; see \S\ref{sec:asts}.  Thus \AST{}s may

 contain a messy mixture of {\tt Variable}s and {\tt Constant}s.  This is

 insignificant at macro level because matching treats them alike.

 Because of this behaviour, different kinds of atoms with the same name are

 indistinguishable, which may make some rules prone to misbehaviour.  Example:

 \begin{ttbox}

 types

   Nil

 consts

   Nil     :: 'a list

 syntax

   "[]"    :: 'a list    ("[]")

 translations

   "[]"    == "Nil"

 \end{ttbox}

 The term {\tt Nil} will be printed as {\tt []}, just as expected.

 The term \verb|%Nil.t| will be printed as \verb|%[].t|, which might not be

 expected!  Guess how type~{\tt Nil} is printed?

 Normalizing an \AST{} involves repeatedly applying macro rules until

 none are applicable.  Macro rules are chosen in order of appearance in

 the theory definitions.  You can watch the normalization of \AST{}s

 during parsing and printing by setting \ttindex{Syntax.trace_ast}

 to {\tt true}.\index{tracing!of macros} Alternatively, use

 \ttindex{Syntax.test_read}.  The information displayed when tracing

 includes the \AST{} before normalization ({\tt pre}), redexes with

 results ({\tt rewrote}), the normal form finally reached ({\tt post})

 and some statistics ({\tt normalize}).

 \subsection{Example: the syntax of finite sets}

 \index{examples!of macros}

 This example demonstrates the use of recursive macros to implement a

 convenient notation for finite sets.

 \index{*empty constant}\index{*insert constant}\index{{}@\verb'{}' symbol}

 \index{"@Enum@{\tt\at Enum} constant}

 \index{"@Finset@{\tt\at Finset} constant}

 \begin{ttbox}

 FinSyntax = SetSyntax +

 types

   is

 syntax

   ""            :: i => is                  ("_")

   "{\at}Enum"       :: [i, is] => is            ("_,/ _")

 consts

   empty         :: i                        ("{\ttlbrace}{\ttrbrace}")

   insert        :: [i, i] => i

 syntax

   "{\at}Finset"     :: is => i                  ("{\ttlbrace}(_){\ttrbrace}")

 translations

   "{\ttlbrace}x, xs{\ttrbrace}"     == "insert(x, {\ttlbrace}xs{\ttrbrace})"

   "{\ttlbrace}x{\ttrbrace}"         == "insert(x, {\ttlbrace}{\ttrbrace})"

 end

 \end{ttbox}

 Finite sets are internally built up by {\tt empty} and {\tt insert}.  The

 declarations above specify \verb|{x, y, z}| as the external representation

 of

 \begin{ttbox}

 insert(x, insert(y, insert(z, empty)))

 \end{ttbox}

 The nonterminal symbol~\ndx{is} stands for one or more objects of type~{\tt

   i} separated by commas.  The mixfix declaration \hbox{\verb|"_,/ _"|}

 allows a line break after the comma for \rmindex{pretty printing}; if no

 line break is required then a space is printed instead.

 The nonterminal is declared as the type~{\tt is}, but with no {\tt arities}

 declaration.  Hence {\tt is} is not a logical type and may be used safely as

 a new nonterminal for custom syntax.  The nonterminal~{\tt is} can later be

 re-used for other enumerations of type~{\tt i} like lists or tuples.  If we

 had needed polymorphic enumerations, we could have used the predefined

 nonterminal symbol \ndx{args} and skipped this part altogether.

 \index{"@Finset@{\tt\at Finset} constant}

 Next follows {\tt empty}, which is already equipped with its syntax

 \verb|{}|, and {\tt insert} without concrete syntax.  The syntactic

 constant {\tt\at Finset} provides concrete syntax for enumerations of~{\tt

   i} enclosed in curly braces.  Remember that a pair of parentheses, as in

 \verb|"{(_)}"|, specifies a block of indentation for pretty printing.

 The translations may look strange at first.  Macro rules are best

 understood in their internal forms:

 \begin{ttbox}

 parse_rules:

   ("{\at}Finset" ("{\at}Enum" x xs))  ->  ("insert" x ("{\at}Finset" xs))

   ("{\at}Finset" x)  ->  ("insert" x "empty")

 print_rules:

   ("insert" x ("{\at}Finset" xs))  ->  ("{\at}Finset" ("{\at}Enum" x xs))

   ("insert" x "empty")  ->  ("{\at}Finset" x)

 \end{ttbox}

 This shows that \verb|{x,xs}| indeed matches any set enumeration of at least

 two elements, binding the first to {\tt x} and the rest to {\tt xs}.

 Likewise, \verb|{xs}| and \verb|{x}| represent any set enumeration.

 The parse rules only work in the order given.

 \begin{warn}

   The \AST{} rewriter cannot distinguish constants from variables and looks

   only for names of atoms.  Thus the names of {\tt Constant}s occurring in

   the (internal) left-hand side of translation rules should be regarded as

   \rmindex{reserved words}.  Choose non-identifiers like {\tt\at Finset} or

   sufficiently long and strange names.  If a bound variable's name gets

   rewritten, the result will be incorrect; for example, the term

 \begin{ttbox}

 \%empty insert. insert(x, empty)

 \end{ttbox}

 \par\noindent is incorrectly printed as \verb|%empty insert. {x}|.

 \end{warn}

 \subsection{Example: a parse macro for dependent types}\label{prod_trans}

 \index{examples!of macros}

 As stated earlier, a macro rule may not introduce new {\tt Variable}s on

 the right-hand side.  Something like \verb|"K(B)" => "%x.B"| is illegal;

 if allowed, it could cause variable capture.  In such cases you usually

 must fall back on translation functions.  But a trick can make things

 readable in some cases: {\em calling\/} translation functions by parse

 macros:

 \begin{ttbox}

 ProdSyntax = SetSyntax +

 consts

   Pi            :: [i, i => i] => i

 syntax

   "{\at}PROD"       :: [idt, i, i] => i       ("(3PROD _:_./ _)" 10)

   "{\at}->"         :: [i, i] => i            ("(_ ->/ _)" [51, 50] 50)

 \ttbreak

 translations

   "PROD x:A. B" => "Pi(A, \%x. B)"

   "A -> B"      => "Pi(A, _K(B))"

 end

 ML

   val print_translation = [("Pi", dependent_tr' ("{\at}PROD", "{\at}->"))];

 \end{ttbox}

 Here {\tt Pi} is a logical constant for constructing general products.

 Two external forms exist: the general case {\tt PROD x:A.B} and the

 function space {\tt A -> B}, which abbreviates \verb|Pi(A, %x.B)| when {\tt B}

 does not depend on~{\tt x}.

 The second parse macro introduces {\tt _K(B)}, which later becomes

 \verb|%x.B| due to a parse translation associated with \cdx{_K}.

 Unfortunately there is no such trick for printing, so we have to add a {\tt

 ML} section for the print translation \ttindex{dependent_tr'}.

 Recall that identifiers with a leading {\tt _} are allowed in translation

 rules, but not in ordinary terms.  Thus we can create \AST{}s containing

 names that are not directly expressible.

 The parse translation for {\tt _K} is already installed in Pure, and the

 function {\tt dependent_tr'} is exported by the syntax module for public use.

 See \S\ref{sec:tr_funs} below for more of the arcane lore of translation

 functions.  \index{macros|)}\index{rewriting!syntactic|)}

 \section{Translation functions} \label{sec:tr_funs}

 \index{translations|(}

 %

 This section describes the translation function mechanism.  By writing

 \ML{} functions, you can do almost everything to terms or \AST{}s

 during parsing and printing.  The logic \LK\ is a good example of

 sophisticated transformations between internal and external

 representations of sequents; here, macros would be useless.

 A full understanding of translations requires some familiarity

 with Isabelle's internals, especially the datatypes {\tt term}, {\tt typ},

 {\tt Syntax.ast} and the encodings of types and terms as such at the various

 stages of the parsing or printing process.  Most users should never need to

 use translation functions.

 \subsection{Declaring translation functions}

 There are four kinds of translation functions, with one of these

 coming in two variants.  Each such function is associated with a name,

 which triggers calls to it.  Such names can be constants (logical or

 syntactic) or type constructors.

 Function {\tt print_syntax} displays the sets of names associated with the

 translation functions of a theory under \texttt{parse_ast_translation}, etc.

 You can add new ones via the {\tt ML} section\index{*ML section} of a theory

 definition file.  Even though the {\tt ML} section is the very last part of

 the file, newly installed translation functions are already effective when

 processing all of the preceding sections.

 The {\tt ML} section's contents are simply copied verbatim near the

 beginning of the \ML\ file generated from a theory definition file.

 Definitions made here are accessible as components of an \ML\ 

 structure; to make some parts private, use an \ML{} {\tt local}

 declaration.  The {\ML} code may install translation functions by

 declaring any of the following identifiers:

 \begin{ttbox}

 val parse_ast_translation   : (string * (ast list -> ast)) list

 val print_ast_translation   : (string * (ast list -> ast)) list

 val parse_translation       : (string * (term list -> term)) list

 val print_translation       : (string * (term list -> term)) list

 val typed_print_translation :

     (string * (bool -> typ -> term list -> term)) list

 \end{ttbox}

 \subsection{The translation strategy}

 The different kinds of translation functions are called during the

 transformations between parse trees, \AST{}s and terms (recall

 Fig.\ts\ref{fig:parse_print}).  Whenever a combination of the form

 $(\mtt"c\mtt"~x@1 \ldots x@n)$ is encountered, and a translation

 function $f$ of appropriate kind exists for $c$, the result is

 computed by the \ML{} function call $f \mtt[ x@1, \ldots, x@n \mtt]$.

 For \AST{} translations, the arguments $x@1, \ldots, x@n$ are \AST{}s.

 A combination has the form $\Constant c$ or $\Appl{\Constant c, x@1,

   \ldots, x@n}$.  For term translations, the arguments are terms and a

 combination has the form $\ttfct{Const} (c, \tau)$ or $\ttfct{Const}

 (c, \tau) \ttapp x@1 \ttapp \ldots \ttapp x@n$.  Terms allow more

 sophisticated transformations than \AST{}s do, typically involving

 abstractions and bound variables. {\em Typed} print translations may

 even peek at the type $\tau$ of the constant they are invoked on; they

 are also passed the current value of the \ttindex{show_sorts} flag.

 Regardless of whether they act on terms or \AST{}s, translation

 functions called during the parsing process differ from those for

 printing more fundamentally in their overall behaviour:

 \begin{description}

 \item[Parse translations] are applied bottom-up.  The arguments are already in

   translated form.  The translations must not fail; exceptions trigger an

   error message.  There may never be more than one function associated with

   any syntactic name.

 \item[Print translations] are applied top-down.  They are supplied with

   arguments that are partly still in internal form.  The result again

   undergoes translation; therefore a print translation should not introduce as

   head the very constant that invoked it.  The function may raise exception

   \xdx{Match} to indicate failure; in this event it has no effect.  Multiple

   functions associated with some syntactic name are tried in an unspecified

   order.

 \end{description}

 Only constant atoms --- constructor \ttindex{Constant} for \AST{}s and

 \ttindex{Const} for terms --- can invoke translation functions.  This

 causes another difference between parsing and printing.

 Parsing starts with a string and the constants are not yet identified.

 Only parse tree heads create {\tt Constant}s in the resulting \AST, as

 described in \S\ref{sec:astofpt}.  Macros and parse \AST{} translations may

 introduce further {\tt Constant}s.  When the final \AST{} is converted to a

 term, all {\tt Constant}s become {\tt Const}s, as described in

 \S\ref{sec:termofast}.

 Printing starts with a well-typed term and all the constants are known.  So

 all logical constants and type constructors may invoke print translations.

 These, and macros, may introduce further constants.

 \subsection{Example: a print translation for dependent types}

 \index{examples!of translations}\indexbold{*dependent_tr'}

 Let us continue the dependent type example (page~\pageref{prod_trans}) by

 examining the parse translation for~\cdx{_K} and the print translation

 {\tt dependent_tr'}, which are both built-in.  By convention, parse

 translations have names ending with {\tt _tr} and print translations have

 names ending with {\tt _tr'}.  Search for such names in the Isabelle

 sources to locate more examples.

 Here is the parse translation for {\tt _K}:

 \begin{ttbox}

 fun k_tr [t] = Abs ("x", dummyT, incr_boundvars 1 t)

   | k_tr ts = raise TERM ("k_tr", ts);

 \end{ttbox}

 If {\tt k_tr} is called with exactly one argument~$t$, it creates a new

 {\tt Abs} node with a body derived from $t$.  Since terms given to parse

 translations are not yet typed, the type of the bound variable in the new

 {\tt Abs} is simply {\tt dummyT}.  The function increments all {\tt Bound}

 nodes referring to outer abstractions by calling \ttindex{incr_boundvars},

 a basic term manipulation function defined in {\tt Pure/term.ML}.

 Here is the print translation for dependent types:

 \begin{ttbox}

 fun dependent_tr' (q, r) (A :: Abs (x, T, B) :: ts) =

       if 0 mem (loose_bnos B) then

         let val (x', B') = Syntax.variant_abs' (x, dummyT, B) in

           list_comb

             (Const (q,dummyT) $

              Syntax.mark_boundT (x',{\thinspace}T) $ A $ B', ts)

         end

       else list_comb (Const (r, dummyT) $ A $ B, ts)

   | dependent_tr' _ _ = raise Match;

 \end{ttbox}

 The argument {\tt (q,{\thinspace}r)} is supplied to the curried function {\tt

   dependent_tr'} by a partial application during its installation.

 For example, we could set up print translations for both {\tt Pi} and

 {\tt Sigma} by including

 \begin{ttbox}\index{*ML section}

 val print_translation =

   [("Pi",    dependent_tr' ("{\at}PROD", "{\at}->")),

    ("Sigma", dependent_tr' ("{\at}SUM", "{\at}*"))];

 \end{ttbox}

 within the {\tt ML} section.  The first of these transforms ${\tt

   Pi}(A, \mtt{Abs}(x, T, B))$ into $\hbox{\tt{\at}PROD}(x', A, B')$ or

 $\hbox{\tt{\at}->}(A, B)$, choosing the latter form if $B$ does not

 depend on~$x$.  It checks this using \ttindex{loose_bnos}, yet another

 function from {\tt Pure/term.ML}.  Note that $x'$ is a version of $x$

 renamed away from all names in $B$, and $B'$ is the body $B$ with {\tt

   Bound} nodes referring to the {\tt Abs} node replaced by

 $\ttfct{Free} (x', \mtt{dummyT})$ (but marked as representing a bound

 variable).

 We must be careful with types here.  While types of {\tt Const}s are

 ignored, type constraints may be printed for some {\tt Free}s and

 {\tt Var}s if \ttindex{show_types} is set to {\tt true}.  Variables of type

 \ttindex{dummyT} are never printed with constraint, though.  The line

 \begin{ttbox}

         let val (x', B') = Syntax.variant_abs' (x, dummyT, B);

 \end{ttbox}\index{*Syntax.variant_abs'}

 replaces bound variable occurrences in~$B$ by the free variable $x'$ with

 type {\tt dummyT}.  Only the binding occurrence of~$x'$ is given the

 correct type~{\tt T}, so this is the only place where a type

 constraint might appear.

 Also note that we are responsible to mark free identifiers that

 actually represent bound variables.  This is achieved by

 \ttindex{Syntax.variant_abs'} and \ttindex{Syntax.mark_boundT} above.

 Failing to do so may cause these names to be printed in the wrong

 style.  \index{translations|)} \index{syntax!transformations|)}

 \section{Token translations} \label{sec:tok_tr}

 \index{token translations|(}

 %

 Isabelle's meta-logic features quite a lot of different kinds of

 identifiers, namely {\em class}, {\em tfree}, {\em tvar}, {\em free},

 {\em bound}, {\em var}.  One might want to have these printed in

 different styles, e.g.\ in bold or italic, or even transcribed into

 something more readable like $\alpha, \alpha', \beta$ instead of {\tt

   'a}, {\tt 'aa}, {\tt 'b} for type variables.  Token translations

 provide a means to such ends, enabling the user to install certain

 \ML{} functions associated with any logical \rmindex{token class} and

 depending on some \rmindex{print mode}.

 The logical class of identifiers can not necessarily be determined by

 its syntactic category, though.  For example, consider free vs.\ bound

 variables.  So Isabelle's pretty printing mechanism, starting from

 fully typed terms, has to be careful to preserve this additional

 information\footnote{This is done by marking atoms in abstract syntax

   trees appropriately.  The marks are actually visible by print

   translation functions -- they are just special constants applied to

   atomic asts, for example \texttt{("_bound" x)}.}.  In particular,

 user-supplied print translation functions operating on terms have to

 be well-behaved in this respect.  Free identifiers introduced to

 represent bound variables have to be marked appropriately (cf.\ the

 example at the end of \S\ref{sec:tr_funs}).

 \medskip Token translations may be installed by declaring the

 \ttindex{token_translation} value within the \texttt{ML} section of a theory

 definition file:

 \begin{ttbox}

 val token_translation: 

       (string * string * (string -> string * real)) list

 \end{ttbox}

 The elements of this list are of the form $(m, c, f)$, where $m$ is a print

 mode identifier, $c$ a token class, and $f\colon string \to string \times

 real$ the actual translation function.  Assuming that $x$ is of identifier

 class $c$, and print mode $m$ is the first (active) mode providing some

 translation for $c$, then $x$ is output according to $f(x) = (x', len)$.

 Thereby $x'$ is the modified identifier name and $len$ its visual length in

 terms of characters (e.g.\ length 1.0 would correspond to $1/2$\,em in

 \LaTeX).  Thus $x'$ may include non-printing parts like control sequences or

 markup information for typesetting systems.

 \index{token translations|)}

 %%% Local Variables: 

 %%% mode: latex

 %%% TeX-master: "ref"

 %%% End: