1.1 --- a/doc-src/TutorialI/CTL/document/PDL.tex	Sat Jan 06 10:36:19 2001 +0100
     1.2 +++ b/doc-src/TutorialI/CTL/document/PDL.tex	Sat Jan 06 11:27:09 2001 +0100
     1.3 @@ -58,14 +58,14 @@
     1.4  {\isachardoublequote}mc{\isacharparenleft}Neg\ f{\isacharparenright}\ \ \ {\isacharequal}\ {\isacharminus}mc\ f{\isachardoublequote}\isanewline
     1.5  {\isachardoublequote}mc{\isacharparenleft}And\ f\ g{\isacharparenright}\ {\isacharequal}\ mc\ f\ {\isasyminter}\ mc\ g{\isachardoublequote}\isanewline
     1.6  {\isachardoublequote}mc{\isacharparenleft}AX\ f{\isacharparenright}\ \ \ \ {\isacharequal}\ {\isacharbraceleft}s{\isachardot}\ {\isasymforall}t{\isachardot}\ {\isacharparenleft}s{\isacharcomma}t{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymin}\ M\ \ {\isasymlongrightarrow}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ mc\ f{\isacharbraceright}{\isachardoublequote}\isanewline
     1.7 -{\isachardoublequote}mc{\isacharparenleft}EF\ f{\isacharparenright}\ \ \ \ {\isacharequal}\ lfp{\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ mc\ f\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isacharcircum}{\isacharminus}{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ T{\isacharparenright}{\isachardoublequote}%
     1.8 +{\isachardoublequote}mc{\isacharparenleft}EF\ f{\isacharparenright}\ \ \ \ {\isacharequal}\ lfp{\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ mc\ f\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isacharcircum}{\isacharminus}{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ T{\isacharparenright}{\isachardoublequote}%
     1.9  \begin{isamarkuptext}%
    1.10  \noindent
    1.11  Only the equation for \isa{EF} deserves some comments. Remember that the
    1.12 -postfix \isa{{\isacharcircum}{\isacharminus}{\isadigit{1}}} and the infix \isa{{\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}} are predefined and denote the
    1.13 +postfix \isa{{\isacharcircum}{\isacharminus}{\isadigit{1}}} and the infix \isa{{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}} are predefined and denote the
    1.14  converse of a relation and the application of a relation to a set. Thus
    1.15 -\isa{M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ T} is the set of all predecessors of \isa{T} and the least
    1.16 -fixed point (\isa{lfp}) of \isa{{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ mc\ f\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ T} is the least set
    1.17 +\isa{M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ T} is the set of all predecessors of \isa{T} and the least
    1.18 +fixed point (\isa{lfp}) of \isa{{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ mc\ f\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ T} is the least set
    1.19  \isa{T} containing \isa{mc\ f} and all predecessors of \isa{T}. If you
    1.20  find it hard to see that \isa{mc\ {\isacharparenleft}EF\ f{\isacharparenright}} contains exactly those states from
    1.21  which there is a path to a state where \isa{f} is true, do not worry---that
    1.22 @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
    1.23  
    1.24  First we prove monotonicity of the function inside \isa{lfp}%
    1.25  \end{isamarkuptext}%
    1.26 -\isacommand{lemma}\ mono{\isacharunderscore}ef{\isacharcolon}\ {\isachardoublequote}mono{\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isacharcircum}{\isacharminus}{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ T{\isacharparenright}{\isachardoublequote}\isanewline
    1.27 +\isacommand{lemma}\ mono{\isacharunderscore}ef{\isacharcolon}\ {\isachardoublequote}mono{\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isacharcircum}{\isacharminus}{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ T{\isacharparenright}{\isachardoublequote}\isanewline
    1.28  \isacommand{apply}{\isacharparenleft}rule\ monoI{\isacharparenright}\isanewline
    1.29  \isacommand{apply}\ blast\isanewline
    1.30  \isacommand{done}%
    1.31 @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
    1.32  a separate lemma:%
    1.33  \end{isamarkuptext}%
    1.34  \isacommand{lemma}\ EF{\isacharunderscore}lemma{\isacharcolon}\isanewline
    1.35 -\ \ {\isachardoublequote}lfp{\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isacharcircum}{\isacharminus}{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ T{\isacharparenright}\ {\isacharequal}\ {\isacharbraceleft}s{\isachardot}\ {\isasymexists}t{\isachardot}\ {\isacharparenleft}s{\isacharcomma}t{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymin}\ M{\isacharcircum}{\isacharasterisk}\ {\isasymand}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A{\isacharbraceright}{\isachardoublequote}%
    1.36 +\ \ {\isachardoublequote}lfp{\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isacharcircum}{\isacharminus}{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ T{\isacharparenright}\ {\isacharequal}\ {\isacharbraceleft}s{\isachardot}\ {\isasymexists}t{\isachardot}\ {\isacharparenleft}s{\isacharcomma}t{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymin}\ M{\isacharcircum}{\isacharasterisk}\ {\isasymand}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A{\isacharbraceright}{\isachardoublequote}%
    1.37  \begin{isamarkuptxt}%
    1.38  \noindent
    1.39  The equality is proved in the canonical fashion by proving that each set
    1.40 @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
    1.41  \noindent
    1.42  Simplification leaves us with the following first subgoal
    1.43  \begin{isabelle}%
    1.44 -\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isachardot}\ {\isasymAnd}s{\isachardot}\ s\ {\isasymin}\ lfp\ {\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ T{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymLongrightarrow}\ {\isasymexists}t{\isachardot}\ {\isacharparenleft}s{\isacharcomma}\ t{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymin}\ M\isactrlsup {\isacharasterisk}\ {\isasymand}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A%
    1.45 +\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isachardot}\ {\isasymAnd}s{\isachardot}\ s\ {\isasymin}\ lfp\ {\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ T{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymLongrightarrow}\ {\isasymexists}t{\isachardot}\ {\isacharparenleft}s{\isacharcomma}\ t{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymin}\ M\isactrlsup {\isacharasterisk}\ {\isasymand}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A%
    1.46  \end{isabelle}
    1.47  which is proved by \isa{lfp}-induction:%
    1.48  \end{isamarkuptxt}%
    1.49 @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
    1.50  \noindent
    1.51  After simplification and clarification we are left with
    1.52  \begin{isabelle}%
    1.53 -\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isachardot}\ {\isasymAnd}x\ t{\isachardot}\ {\isasymlbrakk}{\isacharparenleft}x{\isacharcomma}\ t{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymin}\ M\isactrlsup {\isacharasterisk}{\isacharsemicolon}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A{\isasymrbrakk}\ {\isasymLongrightarrow}\ x\ {\isasymin}\ lfp\ {\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ T{\isacharparenright}%
    1.54 +\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isachardot}\ {\isasymAnd}x\ t{\isachardot}\ {\isasymlbrakk}{\isacharparenleft}x{\isacharcomma}\ t{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymin}\ M\isactrlsup {\isacharasterisk}{\isacharsemicolon}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A{\isasymrbrakk}\ {\isasymLongrightarrow}\ x\ {\isasymin}\ lfp\ {\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ T{\isacharparenright}%
    1.55  \end{isabelle}
    1.56  This goal is proved by induction on \isa{{\isacharparenleft}s{\isacharcomma}\ t{\isacharparenright}\ {\isasymin}\ M\isactrlsup {\isacharasterisk}}. But since the model
    1.57  checker works backwards (from \isa{t} to \isa{s}), we cannot use the
    1.58 @@ -148,14 +148,14 @@
    1.59  \noindent
    1.60  The base case
    1.61  \begin{isabelle}%
    1.62 -\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isachardot}\ {\isasymAnd}x\ t{\isachardot}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A\ {\isasymLongrightarrow}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ lfp\ {\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ T{\isacharparenright}%
    1.63 +\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isachardot}\ {\isasymAnd}x\ t{\isachardot}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A\ {\isasymLongrightarrow}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ lfp\ {\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ T{\isacharparenright}%
    1.64  \end{isabelle}
    1.65  is solved by unrolling \isa{lfp} once%
    1.66  \end{isamarkuptxt}%
    1.67  \ \isacommand{apply}{\isacharparenleft}rule\ ssubst{\isacharbrackleft}OF\ lfp{\isacharunderscore}unfold{\isacharbrackleft}OF\ mono{\isacharunderscore}ef{\isacharbrackright}{\isacharbrackright}{\isacharparenright}%
    1.68  \begin{isamarkuptxt}%
    1.69  \begin{isabelle}%
    1.70 -\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isachardot}\ {\isasymAnd}x\ t{\isachardot}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A\ {\isasymLongrightarrow}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ lfp\ {\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharcircum}{\isacharcircum}\ T{\isacharparenright}%
    1.71 +\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isachardot}\ {\isasymAnd}x\ t{\isachardot}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A\ {\isasymLongrightarrow}\ t\ {\isasymin}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ lfp\ {\isacharparenleft}{\isasymlambda}T{\isachardot}\ A\ {\isasymunion}\ M{\isasyminverse}\ {\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}{\isacharbackquote}\ T{\isacharparenright}%
    1.72  \end{isabelle}
    1.73  and disposing of the resulting trivial subgoal automatically:%
    1.74  \end{isamarkuptxt}%