haftmann@32478
|
1 |
(* Authors: Christophe Tabacznyj, Lawrence C. Paulson, Amine Chaieb,
|
nipkow@31796
|
2 |
Thomas M. Rasmussen, Jeremy Avigad, Tobias Nipkow
|
huffman@31704
|
3 |
|
huffman@31704
|
4 |
|
haftmann@32478
|
5 |
This file deals with the functions gcd and lcm. Definitions and
|
haftmann@32478
|
6 |
lemmas are proved uniformly for the natural numbers and integers.
|
huffman@31704
|
7 |
|
huffman@31704
|
8 |
This file combines and revises a number of prior developments.
|
huffman@31704
|
9 |
|
huffman@31704
|
10 |
The original theories "GCD" and "Primes" were by Christophe Tabacznyj
|
huffman@31704
|
11 |
and Lawrence C. Paulson, based on \cite{davenport92}. They introduced
|
huffman@31704
|
12 |
gcd, lcm, and prime for the natural numbers.
|
huffman@31704
|
13 |
|
huffman@31704
|
14 |
The original theory "IntPrimes" was by Thomas M. Rasmussen, and
|
huffman@31704
|
15 |
extended gcd, lcm, primes to the integers. Amine Chaieb provided
|
huffman@31704
|
16 |
another extension of the notions to the integers, and added a number
|
huffman@31704
|
17 |
of results to "Primes" and "GCD". IntPrimes also defined and developed
|
huffman@31704
|
18 |
the congruence relations on the integers. The notion was extended to
|
berghofe@34915
|
19 |
the natural numbers by Chaieb.
|
huffman@31704
|
20 |
|
avigad@32029
|
21 |
Jeremy Avigad combined all of these, made everything uniform for the
|
avigad@32029
|
22 |
natural numbers and the integers, and added a number of new theorems.
|
avigad@32029
|
23 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
24 |
Tobias Nipkow cleaned up a lot.
|
wenzelm@21256
|
25 |
*)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
26 |
|
huffman@31704
|
27 |
|
berghofe@34915
|
28 |
header {* Greatest common divisor and least common multiple *}
|
wenzelm@21256
|
29 |
|
wenzelm@21256
|
30 |
theory GCD
|
haftmann@33301
|
31 |
imports Fact Parity
|
wenzelm@21256
|
32 |
begin
|
wenzelm@21256
|
33 |
|
huffman@31704
|
34 |
declare One_nat_def [simp del]
|
wenzelm@21256
|
35 |
|
haftmann@34028
|
36 |
subsection {* GCD and LCM definitions *}
|
huffman@31704
|
37 |
|
nipkow@31992
|
38 |
class gcd = zero + one + dvd +
|
wenzelm@41798
|
39 |
fixes gcd :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"
|
wenzelm@41798
|
40 |
and lcm :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"
|
huffman@31704
|
41 |
begin
|
huffman@31704
|
42 |
|
huffman@31704
|
43 |
abbreviation
|
huffman@31704
|
44 |
coprime :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
|
huffman@31704
|
45 |
where
|
huffman@31704
|
46 |
"coprime x y == (gcd x y = 1)"
|
huffman@31704
|
47 |
|
huffman@31704
|
48 |
end
|
huffman@31704
|
49 |
|
huffman@31704
|
50 |
instantiation nat :: gcd
|
huffman@31704
|
51 |
begin
|
huffman@31704
|
52 |
|
huffman@31704
|
53 |
fun
|
huffman@31704
|
54 |
gcd_nat :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
|
huffman@31704
|
55 |
where
|
huffman@31704
|
56 |
"gcd_nat x y =
|
huffman@31704
|
57 |
(if y = 0 then x else gcd y (x mod y))"
|
wenzelm@21256
|
58 |
|
haftmann@23687
|
59 |
definition
|
huffman@31704
|
60 |
lcm_nat :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
|
huffman@31704
|
61 |
where
|
huffman@31704
|
62 |
"lcm_nat x y = x * y div (gcd x y)"
|
haftmann@23687
|
63 |
|
huffman@31704
|
64 |
instance proof qed
|
haftmann@23687
|
65 |
|
huffman@31704
|
66 |
end
|
haftmann@23687
|
67 |
|
huffman@31704
|
68 |
instantiation int :: gcd
|
huffman@31704
|
69 |
begin
|
huffman@31704
|
70 |
|
huffman@31704
|
71 |
definition
|
huffman@31704
|
72 |
gcd_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
|
chaieb@27568
|
73 |
where
|
huffman@31704
|
74 |
"gcd_int x y = int (gcd (nat (abs x)) (nat (abs y)))"
|
huffman@31704
|
75 |
|
huffman@31704
|
76 |
definition
|
huffman@31704
|
77 |
lcm_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
|
huffman@31704
|
78 |
where
|
huffman@31704
|
79 |
"lcm_int x y = int (lcm (nat (abs x)) (nat (abs y)))"
|
huffman@31704
|
80 |
|
huffman@31704
|
81 |
instance proof qed
|
huffman@31704
|
82 |
|
huffman@31704
|
83 |
end
|
huffman@31704
|
84 |
|
huffman@31704
|
85 |
|
haftmann@34028
|
86 |
subsection {* Transfer setup *}
|
huffman@31704
|
87 |
|
huffman@31704
|
88 |
lemma transfer_nat_int_gcd:
|
huffman@31704
|
89 |
"(x::int) >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (nat x) (nat y) = nat (gcd x y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
90 |
"(x::int) >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> lcm (nat x) (nat y) = nat (lcm x y)"
|
haftmann@32478
|
91 |
unfolding gcd_int_def lcm_int_def
|
huffman@31704
|
92 |
by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
93 |
|
huffman@31704
|
94 |
lemma transfer_nat_int_gcd_closures:
|
huffman@31704
|
95 |
"x >= (0::int) \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y >= 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
96 |
"x >= (0::int) \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> lcm x y >= 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
97 |
by (auto simp add: gcd_int_def lcm_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
98 |
|
haftmann@35644
|
99 |
declare transfer_morphism_nat_int[transfer add return:
|
huffman@31704
|
100 |
transfer_nat_int_gcd transfer_nat_int_gcd_closures]
|
huffman@31704
|
101 |
|
huffman@31704
|
102 |
lemma transfer_int_nat_gcd:
|
huffman@31704
|
103 |
"gcd (int x) (int y) = int (gcd x y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
104 |
"lcm (int x) (int y) = int (lcm x y)"
|
haftmann@32478
|
105 |
by (unfold gcd_int_def lcm_int_def, auto)
|
huffman@31704
|
106 |
|
huffman@31704
|
107 |
lemma transfer_int_nat_gcd_closures:
|
huffman@31704
|
108 |
"is_nat x \<Longrightarrow> is_nat y \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y >= 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
109 |
"is_nat x \<Longrightarrow> is_nat y \<Longrightarrow> lcm x y >= 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
110 |
by (auto simp add: gcd_int_def lcm_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
111 |
|
haftmann@35644
|
112 |
declare transfer_morphism_int_nat[transfer add return:
|
huffman@31704
|
113 |
transfer_int_nat_gcd transfer_int_nat_gcd_closures]
|
huffman@31704
|
114 |
|
huffman@31704
|
115 |
|
haftmann@34028
|
116 |
subsection {* GCD properties *}
|
huffman@31704
|
117 |
|
huffman@31704
|
118 |
(* was gcd_induct *)
|
nipkow@31952
|
119 |
lemma gcd_nat_induct:
|
haftmann@23687
|
120 |
fixes m n :: nat
|
haftmann@23687
|
121 |
assumes "\<And>m. P m 0"
|
haftmann@23687
|
122 |
and "\<And>m n. 0 < n \<Longrightarrow> P n (m mod n) \<Longrightarrow> P m n"
|
haftmann@23687
|
123 |
shows "P m n"
|
huffman@31704
|
124 |
apply (rule gcd_nat.induct)
|
huffman@31704
|
125 |
apply (case_tac "y = 0")
|
huffman@31704
|
126 |
using assms apply simp_all
|
huffman@31704
|
127 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
128 |
|
huffman@31704
|
129 |
(* specific to int *)
|
huffman@31704
|
130 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
131 |
lemma gcd_neg1_int [simp]: "gcd (-x::int) y = gcd x y"
|
huffman@31704
|
132 |
by (simp add: gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
133 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
134 |
lemma gcd_neg2_int [simp]: "gcd (x::int) (-y) = gcd x y"
|
huffman@31704
|
135 |
by (simp add: gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
136 |
|
nipkow@31813
|
137 |
lemma abs_gcd_int[simp]: "abs(gcd (x::int) y) = gcd x y"
|
nipkow@31813
|
138 |
by(simp add: gcd_int_def)
|
nipkow@31813
|
139 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
140 |
lemma gcd_abs_int: "gcd (x::int) y = gcd (abs x) (abs y)"
|
nipkow@31813
|
141 |
by (simp add: gcd_int_def)
|
nipkow@31813
|
142 |
|
nipkow@31813
|
143 |
lemma gcd_abs1_int[simp]: "gcd (abs x) (y::int) = gcd x y"
|
nipkow@31952
|
144 |
by (metis abs_idempotent gcd_abs_int)
|
nipkow@31813
|
145 |
|
nipkow@31813
|
146 |
lemma gcd_abs2_int[simp]: "gcd x (abs y::int) = gcd x y"
|
nipkow@31952
|
147 |
by (metis abs_idempotent gcd_abs_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
148 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
149 |
lemma gcd_cases_int:
|
huffman@31704
|
150 |
fixes x :: int and y
|
huffman@31704
|
151 |
assumes "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (gcd x y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
152 |
and "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (gcd x (-y))"
|
huffman@31704
|
153 |
and "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (gcd (-x) y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
154 |
and "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (gcd (-x) (-y))"
|
huffman@31704
|
155 |
shows "P (gcd x y)"
|
huffman@35208
|
156 |
by (insert assms, auto, arith)
|
huffman@31704
|
157 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
158 |
lemma gcd_ge_0_int [simp]: "gcd (x::int) y >= 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
159 |
by (simp add: gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
160 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
161 |
lemma lcm_neg1_int: "lcm (-x::int) y = lcm x y"
|
huffman@31704
|
162 |
by (simp add: lcm_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
163 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
164 |
lemma lcm_neg2_int: "lcm (x::int) (-y) = lcm x y"
|
huffman@31704
|
165 |
by (simp add: lcm_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
166 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
167 |
lemma lcm_abs_int: "lcm (x::int) y = lcm (abs x) (abs y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
168 |
by (simp add: lcm_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
169 |
|
nipkow@31814
|
170 |
lemma abs_lcm_int [simp]: "abs (lcm i j::int) = lcm i j"
|
nipkow@31814
|
171 |
by(simp add:lcm_int_def)
|
nipkow@31814
|
172 |
|
nipkow@31814
|
173 |
lemma lcm_abs1_int[simp]: "lcm (abs x) (y::int) = lcm x y"
|
nipkow@31814
|
174 |
by (metis abs_idempotent lcm_int_def)
|
nipkow@31814
|
175 |
|
nipkow@31814
|
176 |
lemma lcm_abs2_int[simp]: "lcm x (abs y::int) = lcm x y"
|
nipkow@31814
|
177 |
by (metis abs_idempotent lcm_int_def)
|
nipkow@31814
|
178 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
179 |
lemma lcm_cases_int:
|
huffman@31704
|
180 |
fixes x :: int and y
|
huffman@31704
|
181 |
assumes "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (lcm x y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
182 |
and "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (lcm x (-y))"
|
huffman@31704
|
183 |
and "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (lcm (-x) y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
184 |
and "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (lcm (-x) (-y))"
|
huffman@31704
|
185 |
shows "P (lcm x y)"
|
wenzelm@41798
|
186 |
using assms by (auto simp add: lcm_neg1_int lcm_neg2_int) arith
|
huffman@31704
|
187 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
188 |
lemma lcm_ge_0_int [simp]: "lcm (x::int) y >= 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
189 |
by (simp add: lcm_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
190 |
|
huffman@31704
|
191 |
(* was gcd_0, etc. *)
|
nipkow@31952
|
192 |
lemma gcd_0_nat [simp]: "gcd (x::nat) 0 = x"
|
wenzelm@21263
|
193 |
by simp
|
wenzelm@21256
|
194 |
|
huffman@31704
|
195 |
(* was igcd_0, etc. *)
|
nipkow@31952
|
196 |
lemma gcd_0_int [simp]: "gcd (x::int) 0 = abs x"
|
huffman@31704
|
197 |
by (unfold gcd_int_def, auto)
|
huffman@31704
|
198 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
199 |
lemma gcd_0_left_nat [simp]: "gcd 0 (x::nat) = x"
|
haftmann@23687
|
200 |
by simp
|
haftmann@23687
|
201 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
202 |
lemma gcd_0_left_int [simp]: "gcd 0 (x::int) = abs x"
|
huffman@31704
|
203 |
by (unfold gcd_int_def, auto)
|
huffman@31704
|
204 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
205 |
lemma gcd_red_nat: "gcd (x::nat) y = gcd y (x mod y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
206 |
by (case_tac "y = 0", auto)
|
huffman@31704
|
207 |
|
huffman@31704
|
208 |
(* weaker, but useful for the simplifier *)
|
huffman@31704
|
209 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
210 |
lemma gcd_non_0_nat: "y ~= (0::nat) \<Longrightarrow> gcd (x::nat) y = gcd y (x mod y)"
|
haftmann@23687
|
211 |
by simp
|
haftmann@23687
|
212 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
213 |
lemma gcd_1_nat [simp]: "gcd (m::nat) 1 = 1"
|
wenzelm@21263
|
214 |
by simp
|
wenzelm@21256
|
215 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
216 |
lemma gcd_Suc_0 [simp]: "gcd (m::nat) (Suc 0) = Suc 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
217 |
by (simp add: One_nat_def)
|
huffman@30019
|
218 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
219 |
lemma gcd_1_int [simp]: "gcd (m::int) 1 = 1"
|
huffman@31704
|
220 |
by (simp add: gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
221 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
222 |
lemma gcd_idem_nat: "gcd (x::nat) x = x"
|
nipkow@31796
|
223 |
by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
224 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
225 |
lemma gcd_idem_int: "gcd (x::int) x = abs x"
|
nipkow@31813
|
226 |
by (auto simp add: gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
227 |
|
huffman@31704
|
228 |
declare gcd_nat.simps [simp del]
|
wenzelm@21256
|
229 |
|
wenzelm@21256
|
230 |
text {*
|
haftmann@27556
|
231 |
\medskip @{term "gcd m n"} divides @{text m} and @{text n}. The
|
wenzelm@21256
|
232 |
conjunctions don't seem provable separately.
|
wenzelm@21256
|
233 |
*}
|
wenzelm@21256
|
234 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
235 |
lemma gcd_dvd1_nat [iff]: "(gcd (m::nat)) n dvd m"
|
nipkow@31952
|
236 |
and gcd_dvd2_nat [iff]: "(gcd m n) dvd n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
237 |
apply (induct m n rule: gcd_nat_induct)
|
nipkow@31952
|
238 |
apply (simp_all add: gcd_non_0_nat)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
239 |
apply (blast dest: dvd_mod_imp_dvd)
|
huffman@31704
|
240 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
241 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
242 |
lemma gcd_dvd1_int [iff]: "gcd (x::int) y dvd x"
|
nipkow@31952
|
243 |
by (metis gcd_int_def int_dvd_iff gcd_dvd1_nat)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
244 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
245 |
lemma gcd_dvd2_int [iff]: "gcd (x::int) y dvd y"
|
nipkow@31952
|
246 |
by (metis gcd_int_def int_dvd_iff gcd_dvd2_nat)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
247 |
|
nipkow@31730
|
248 |
lemma dvd_gcd_D1_nat: "k dvd gcd m n \<Longrightarrow> (k::nat) dvd m"
|
nipkow@31952
|
249 |
by(metis gcd_dvd1_nat dvd_trans)
|
nipkow@31730
|
250 |
|
nipkow@31730
|
251 |
lemma dvd_gcd_D2_nat: "k dvd gcd m n \<Longrightarrow> (k::nat) dvd n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
252 |
by(metis gcd_dvd2_nat dvd_trans)
|
nipkow@31730
|
253 |
|
nipkow@31730
|
254 |
lemma dvd_gcd_D1_int: "i dvd gcd m n \<Longrightarrow> (i::int) dvd m"
|
nipkow@31952
|
255 |
by(metis gcd_dvd1_int dvd_trans)
|
nipkow@31730
|
256 |
|
nipkow@31730
|
257 |
lemma dvd_gcd_D2_int: "i dvd gcd m n \<Longrightarrow> (i::int) dvd n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
258 |
by(metis gcd_dvd2_int dvd_trans)
|
nipkow@31730
|
259 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
260 |
lemma gcd_le1_nat [simp]: "a \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (a::nat) b \<le> a"
|
huffman@31704
|
261 |
by (rule dvd_imp_le, auto)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
262 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
263 |
lemma gcd_le2_nat [simp]: "b \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (a::nat) b \<le> b"
|
huffman@31704
|
264 |
by (rule dvd_imp_le, auto)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
265 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
266 |
lemma gcd_le1_int [simp]: "a > 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (a::int) b \<le> a"
|
huffman@31704
|
267 |
by (rule zdvd_imp_le, auto)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
268 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
269 |
lemma gcd_le2_int [simp]: "b > 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (a::int) b \<le> b"
|
huffman@31704
|
270 |
by (rule zdvd_imp_le, auto)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
271 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
272 |
lemma gcd_greatest_nat: "(k::nat) dvd m \<Longrightarrow> k dvd n \<Longrightarrow> k dvd gcd m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
273 |
by (induct m n rule: gcd_nat_induct) (simp_all add: gcd_non_0_nat dvd_mod)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
274 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
275 |
lemma gcd_greatest_int:
|
nipkow@31813
|
276 |
"(k::int) dvd m \<Longrightarrow> k dvd n \<Longrightarrow> k dvd gcd m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
277 |
apply (subst gcd_abs_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
278 |
apply (subst abs_dvd_iff [symmetric])
|
nipkow@31952
|
279 |
apply (rule gcd_greatest_nat [transferred])
|
nipkow@31813
|
280 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
281 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
282 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
283 |
lemma gcd_greatest_iff_nat [iff]: "(k dvd gcd (m::nat) n) =
|
huffman@31704
|
284 |
(k dvd m & k dvd n)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
285 |
by (blast intro!: gcd_greatest_nat intro: dvd_trans)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
286 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
287 |
lemma gcd_greatest_iff_int: "((k::int) dvd gcd m n) = (k dvd m & k dvd n)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
288 |
by (blast intro!: gcd_greatest_int intro: dvd_trans)
|
huffman@31704
|
289 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
290 |
lemma gcd_zero_nat [simp]: "(gcd (m::nat) n = 0) = (m = 0 & n = 0)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
291 |
by (simp only: dvd_0_left_iff [symmetric] gcd_greatest_iff_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
292 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
293 |
lemma gcd_zero_int [simp]: "(gcd (m::int) n = 0) = (m = 0 & n = 0)"
|
huffman@31704
|
294 |
by (auto simp add: gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
295 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
296 |
lemma gcd_pos_nat [simp]: "(gcd (m::nat) n > 0) = (m ~= 0 | n ~= 0)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
297 |
by (insert gcd_zero_nat [of m n], arith)
|
huffman@31704
|
298 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
299 |
lemma gcd_pos_int [simp]: "(gcd (m::int) n > 0) = (m ~= 0 | n ~= 0)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
300 |
by (insert gcd_zero_int [of m n], insert gcd_ge_0_int [of m n], arith)
|
huffman@31704
|
301 |
|
haftmann@37770
|
302 |
interpretation gcd_nat: abel_semigroup "gcd :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
|
haftmann@34960
|
303 |
proof
|
haftmann@34960
|
304 |
qed (auto intro: dvd_antisym dvd_trans)
|
huffman@31704
|
305 |
|
haftmann@37770
|
306 |
interpretation gcd_int: abel_semigroup "gcd :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
|
haftmann@34960
|
307 |
proof
|
haftmann@34960
|
308 |
qed (simp_all add: gcd_int_def gcd_nat.assoc gcd_nat.commute gcd_nat.left_commute)
|
huffman@31704
|
309 |
|
haftmann@34960
|
310 |
lemmas gcd_assoc_nat = gcd_nat.assoc
|
haftmann@34960
|
311 |
lemmas gcd_commute_nat = gcd_nat.commute
|
haftmann@34960
|
312 |
lemmas gcd_left_commute_nat = gcd_nat.left_commute
|
haftmann@34960
|
313 |
lemmas gcd_assoc_int = gcd_int.assoc
|
haftmann@34960
|
314 |
lemmas gcd_commute_int = gcd_int.commute
|
haftmann@34960
|
315 |
lemmas gcd_left_commute_int = gcd_int.left_commute
|
huffman@31704
|
316 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
317 |
lemmas gcd_ac_nat = gcd_assoc_nat gcd_commute_nat gcd_left_commute_nat
|
huffman@31704
|
318 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
319 |
lemmas gcd_ac_int = gcd_assoc_int gcd_commute_int gcd_left_commute_int
|
huffman@31704
|
320 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
321 |
lemma gcd_unique_nat: "(d::nat) dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
|
huffman@31704
|
322 |
(\<forall>e. e dvd a \<and> e dvd b \<longrightarrow> e dvd d) \<longleftrightarrow> d = gcd a b"
|
huffman@31704
|
323 |
apply auto
|
nipkow@33657
|
324 |
apply (rule dvd_antisym)
|
nipkow@31952
|
325 |
apply (erule (1) gcd_greatest_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
326 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
327 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
328 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
329 |
lemma gcd_unique_int: "d >= 0 & (d::int) dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
|
huffman@31704
|
330 |
(\<forall>e. e dvd a \<and> e dvd b \<longrightarrow> e dvd d) \<longleftrightarrow> d = gcd a b"
|
nipkow@33657
|
331 |
apply (case_tac "d = 0")
|
nipkow@33657
|
332 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@33657
|
333 |
apply (rule iffI)
|
nipkow@33657
|
334 |
apply (rule zdvd_antisym_nonneg)
|
nipkow@33657
|
335 |
apply (auto intro: gcd_greatest_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
336 |
done
|
huffman@30019
|
337 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
338 |
lemma gcd_proj1_if_dvd_nat [simp]: "(x::nat) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y = x"
|
nipkow@31952
|
339 |
by (metis dvd.eq_iff gcd_unique_nat)
|
nipkow@31796
|
340 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
341 |
lemma gcd_proj2_if_dvd_nat [simp]: "(y::nat) dvd x \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y = y"
|
nipkow@31952
|
342 |
by (metis dvd.eq_iff gcd_unique_nat)
|
nipkow@31796
|
343 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
344 |
lemma gcd_proj1_if_dvd_int[simp]: "x dvd y \<Longrightarrow> gcd (x::int) y = abs x"
|
nipkow@31952
|
345 |
by (metis abs_dvd_iff abs_eq_0 gcd_0_left_int gcd_abs_int gcd_unique_int)
|
nipkow@31796
|
346 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
347 |
lemma gcd_proj2_if_dvd_int[simp]: "y dvd x \<Longrightarrow> gcd (x::int) y = abs y"
|
nipkow@31952
|
348 |
by (metis gcd_proj1_if_dvd_int gcd_commute_int)
|
nipkow@31796
|
349 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
350 |
|
wenzelm@21256
|
351 |
text {*
|
wenzelm@21256
|
352 |
\medskip Multiplication laws
|
wenzelm@21256
|
353 |
*}
|
wenzelm@21256
|
354 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
355 |
lemma gcd_mult_distrib_nat: "(k::nat) * gcd m n = gcd (k * m) (k * n)"
|
wenzelm@21256
|
356 |
-- {* \cite[page 27]{davenport92} *}
|
nipkow@31952
|
357 |
apply (induct m n rule: gcd_nat_induct)
|
huffman@31704
|
358 |
apply simp
|
wenzelm@21256
|
359 |
apply (case_tac "k = 0")
|
huffman@46141
|
360 |
apply (simp_all add: gcd_non_0_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
361 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
362 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
363 |
lemma gcd_mult_distrib_int: "abs (k::int) * gcd m n = gcd (k * m) (k * n)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
364 |
apply (subst (1 2) gcd_abs_int)
|
nipkow@31813
|
365 |
apply (subst (1 2) abs_mult)
|
nipkow@31952
|
366 |
apply (rule gcd_mult_distrib_nat [transferred])
|
huffman@31704
|
367 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
368 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
369 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
370 |
lemma coprime_dvd_mult_nat: "coprime (k::nat) n \<Longrightarrow> k dvd m * n \<Longrightarrow> k dvd m"
|
nipkow@31952
|
371 |
apply (insert gcd_mult_distrib_nat [of m k n])
|
wenzelm@21256
|
372 |
apply simp
|
wenzelm@21256
|
373 |
apply (erule_tac t = m in ssubst)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
374 |
apply simp
|
wenzelm@21256
|
375 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
376 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
377 |
lemma coprime_dvd_mult_int:
|
nipkow@31813
|
378 |
"coprime (k::int) n \<Longrightarrow> k dvd m * n \<Longrightarrow> k dvd m"
|
nipkow@31813
|
379 |
apply (subst abs_dvd_iff [symmetric])
|
nipkow@31813
|
380 |
apply (subst dvd_abs_iff [symmetric])
|
nipkow@31952
|
381 |
apply (subst (asm) gcd_abs_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
382 |
apply (rule coprime_dvd_mult_nat [transferred])
|
nipkow@31813
|
383 |
prefer 4 apply assumption
|
nipkow@31813
|
384 |
apply auto
|
nipkow@31813
|
385 |
apply (subst abs_mult [symmetric], auto)
|
huffman@31704
|
386 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
387 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
388 |
lemma coprime_dvd_mult_iff_nat: "coprime (k::nat) n \<Longrightarrow>
|
huffman@31704
|
389 |
(k dvd m * n) = (k dvd m)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
390 |
by (auto intro: coprime_dvd_mult_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
391 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
392 |
lemma coprime_dvd_mult_iff_int: "coprime (k::int) n \<Longrightarrow>
|
huffman@31704
|
393 |
(k dvd m * n) = (k dvd m)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
394 |
by (auto intro: coprime_dvd_mult_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
395 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
396 |
lemma gcd_mult_cancel_nat: "coprime k n \<Longrightarrow> gcd ((k::nat) * m) n = gcd m n"
|
nipkow@33657
|
397 |
apply (rule dvd_antisym)
|
nipkow@31952
|
398 |
apply (rule gcd_greatest_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
399 |
apply (rule_tac n = k in coprime_dvd_mult_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
400 |
apply (simp add: gcd_assoc_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
401 |
apply (simp add: gcd_commute_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
402 |
apply (simp_all add: mult_commute)
|
huffman@31704
|
403 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
404 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
405 |
lemma gcd_mult_cancel_int:
|
nipkow@31813
|
406 |
"coprime (k::int) n \<Longrightarrow> gcd (k * m) n = gcd m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
407 |
apply (subst (1 2) gcd_abs_int)
|
nipkow@31813
|
408 |
apply (subst abs_mult)
|
nipkow@31952
|
409 |
apply (rule gcd_mult_cancel_nat [transferred], auto)
|
huffman@31704
|
410 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
411 |
|
haftmann@35368
|
412 |
lemma coprime_crossproduct_nat:
|
haftmann@35368
|
413 |
fixes a b c d :: nat
|
haftmann@35368
|
414 |
assumes "coprime a d" and "coprime b c"
|
haftmann@35368
|
415 |
shows "a * c = b * d \<longleftrightarrow> a = b \<and> c = d" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
|
haftmann@35368
|
416 |
proof
|
haftmann@35368
|
417 |
assume ?rhs then show ?lhs by simp
|
haftmann@35368
|
418 |
next
|
haftmann@35368
|
419 |
assume ?lhs
|
haftmann@35368
|
420 |
from `?lhs` have "a dvd b * d" by (auto intro: dvdI dest: sym)
|
haftmann@35368
|
421 |
with `coprime a d` have "a dvd b" by (simp add: coprime_dvd_mult_iff_nat)
|
haftmann@35368
|
422 |
from `?lhs` have "b dvd a * c" by (auto intro: dvdI dest: sym)
|
haftmann@35368
|
423 |
with `coprime b c` have "b dvd a" by (simp add: coprime_dvd_mult_iff_nat)
|
haftmann@35368
|
424 |
from `?lhs` have "c dvd d * b" by (auto intro: dvdI dest: sym simp add: mult_commute)
|
haftmann@35368
|
425 |
with `coprime b c` have "c dvd d" by (simp add: coprime_dvd_mult_iff_nat gcd_commute_nat)
|
haftmann@35368
|
426 |
from `?lhs` have "d dvd c * a" by (auto intro: dvdI dest: sym simp add: mult_commute)
|
haftmann@35368
|
427 |
with `coprime a d` have "d dvd c" by (simp add: coprime_dvd_mult_iff_nat gcd_commute_nat)
|
haftmann@35368
|
428 |
from `a dvd b` `b dvd a` have "a = b" by (rule Nat.dvd.antisym)
|
haftmann@35368
|
429 |
moreover from `c dvd d` `d dvd c` have "c = d" by (rule Nat.dvd.antisym)
|
haftmann@35368
|
430 |
ultimately show ?rhs ..
|
haftmann@35368
|
431 |
qed
|
haftmann@35368
|
432 |
|
haftmann@35368
|
433 |
lemma coprime_crossproduct_int:
|
haftmann@35368
|
434 |
fixes a b c d :: int
|
haftmann@35368
|
435 |
assumes "coprime a d" and "coprime b c"
|
haftmann@35368
|
436 |
shows "\<bar>a\<bar> * \<bar>c\<bar> = \<bar>b\<bar> * \<bar>d\<bar> \<longleftrightarrow> \<bar>a\<bar> = \<bar>b\<bar> \<and> \<bar>c\<bar> = \<bar>d\<bar>"
|
haftmann@35368
|
437 |
using assms by (intro coprime_crossproduct_nat [transferred]) auto
|
haftmann@35368
|
438 |
|
wenzelm@21256
|
439 |
text {* \medskip Addition laws *}
|
wenzelm@21256
|
440 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
441 |
lemma gcd_add1_nat [simp]: "gcd ((m::nat) + n) n = gcd m n"
|
huffman@31704
|
442 |
apply (case_tac "n = 0")
|
nipkow@31952
|
443 |
apply (simp_all add: gcd_non_0_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
444 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
445 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
446 |
lemma gcd_add2_nat [simp]: "gcd (m::nat) (m + n) = gcd m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
447 |
apply (subst (1 2) gcd_commute_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
448 |
apply (subst add_commute)
|
huffman@31704
|
449 |
apply simp
|
huffman@31704
|
450 |
done
|
wenzelm@21256
|
451 |
|
huffman@31704
|
452 |
(* to do: add the other variations? *)
|
huffman@31704
|
453 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
454 |
lemma gcd_diff1_nat: "(m::nat) >= n \<Longrightarrow> gcd (m - n) n = gcd m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
455 |
by (subst gcd_add1_nat [symmetric], auto)
|
huffman@31704
|
456 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
457 |
lemma gcd_diff2_nat: "(n::nat) >= m \<Longrightarrow> gcd (n - m) n = gcd m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
458 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
459 |
apply (subst gcd_diff1_nat [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
460 |
apply auto
|
nipkow@31952
|
461 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
462 |
apply (subst gcd_diff1_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
463 |
apply assumption
|
nipkow@31952
|
464 |
apply (rule gcd_commute_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
465 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
466 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
467 |
lemma gcd_non_0_int: "(y::int) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y = gcd y (x mod y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
468 |
apply (frule_tac b = y and a = x in pos_mod_sign)
|
huffman@31704
|
469 |
apply (simp del: pos_mod_sign add: gcd_int_def abs_if nat_mod_distrib)
|
nipkow@31952
|
470 |
apply (auto simp add: gcd_non_0_nat nat_mod_distrib [symmetric]
|
huffman@31704
|
471 |
zmod_zminus1_eq_if)
|
huffman@31704
|
472 |
apply (frule_tac a = x in pos_mod_bound)
|
nipkow@31952
|
473 |
apply (subst (1 2) gcd_commute_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
474 |
apply (simp del: pos_mod_bound add: nat_diff_distrib gcd_diff2_nat
|
huffman@31704
|
475 |
nat_le_eq_zle)
|
huffman@31704
|
476 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
477 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
478 |
lemma gcd_red_int: "gcd (x::int) y = gcd y (x mod y)"
|
huffman@31704
|
479 |
apply (case_tac "y = 0")
|
huffman@31704
|
480 |
apply force
|
huffman@31704
|
481 |
apply (case_tac "y > 0")
|
nipkow@31952
|
482 |
apply (subst gcd_non_0_int, auto)
|
nipkow@31952
|
483 |
apply (insert gcd_non_0_int [of "-y" "-x"])
|
huffman@35208
|
484 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
485 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
486 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
487 |
lemma gcd_add1_int [simp]: "gcd ((m::int) + n) n = gcd m n"
|
huffman@45692
|
488 |
by (metis gcd_red_int mod_add_self1 add_commute)
|
huffman@31704
|
489 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
490 |
lemma gcd_add2_int [simp]: "gcd m ((m::int) + n) = gcd m n"
|
huffman@45692
|
491 |
by (metis gcd_add1_int gcd_commute_int add_commute)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
492 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
493 |
lemma gcd_add_mult_nat: "gcd (m::nat) (k * m + n) = gcd m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
494 |
by (metis mod_mult_self3 gcd_commute_nat gcd_red_nat)
|
wenzelm@21256
|
495 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
496 |
lemma gcd_add_mult_int: "gcd (m::int) (k * m + n) = gcd m n"
|
huffman@45692
|
497 |
by (metis gcd_commute_int gcd_red_int mod_mult_self1 add_commute)
|
nipkow@31796
|
498 |
|
huffman@31704
|
499 |
|
huffman@31704
|
500 |
(* to do: differences, and all variations of addition rules
|
huffman@31704
|
501 |
as simplification rules for nat and int *)
|
huffman@31704
|
502 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
503 |
(* FIXME remove iff *)
|
nipkow@31952
|
504 |
lemma gcd_dvd_prod_nat [iff]: "gcd (m::nat) n dvd k * n"
|
haftmann@23687
|
505 |
using mult_dvd_mono [of 1] by auto
|
chaieb@22027
|
506 |
|
huffman@31704
|
507 |
(* to do: add the three variations of these, and for ints? *)
|
chaieb@22027
|
508 |
|
nipkow@31992
|
509 |
lemma finite_divisors_nat[simp]:
|
nipkow@31992
|
510 |
assumes "(m::nat) ~= 0" shows "finite{d. d dvd m}"
|
nipkow@31734
|
511 |
proof-
|
nipkow@31734
|
512 |
have "finite{d. d <= m}" by(blast intro: bounded_nat_set_is_finite)
|
nipkow@31734
|
513 |
from finite_subset[OF _ this] show ?thesis using assms
|
nipkow@31734
|
514 |
by(bestsimp intro!:dvd_imp_le)
|
nipkow@31734
|
515 |
qed
|
nipkow@31734
|
516 |
|
nipkow@31995
|
517 |
lemma finite_divisors_int[simp]:
|
nipkow@31734
|
518 |
assumes "(i::int) ~= 0" shows "finite{d. d dvd i}"
|
nipkow@31734
|
519 |
proof-
|
nipkow@31734
|
520 |
have "{d. abs d <= abs i} = {- abs i .. abs i}" by(auto simp:abs_if)
|
nipkow@31734
|
521 |
hence "finite{d. abs d <= abs i}" by simp
|
nipkow@31734
|
522 |
from finite_subset[OF _ this] show ?thesis using assms
|
nipkow@31734
|
523 |
by(bestsimp intro!:dvd_imp_le_int)
|
nipkow@31734
|
524 |
qed
|
nipkow@31734
|
525 |
|
nipkow@31995
|
526 |
lemma Max_divisors_self_nat[simp]: "n\<noteq>0 \<Longrightarrow> Max{d::nat. d dvd n} = n"
|
nipkow@31995
|
527 |
apply(rule antisym)
|
nipkow@45761
|
528 |
apply (fastforce intro: Max_le_iff[THEN iffD2] simp: dvd_imp_le)
|
nipkow@31995
|
529 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@31995
|
530 |
done
|
nipkow@31995
|
531 |
|
nipkow@31995
|
532 |
lemma Max_divisors_self_int[simp]: "n\<noteq>0 \<Longrightarrow> Max{d::int. d dvd n} = abs n"
|
nipkow@31995
|
533 |
apply(rule antisym)
|
haftmann@45141
|
534 |
apply(rule Max_le_iff [THEN iffD2])
|
haftmann@45141
|
535 |
apply (auto intro: abs_le_D1 dvd_imp_le_int)
|
nipkow@31995
|
536 |
done
|
nipkow@31995
|
537 |
|
nipkow@31734
|
538 |
lemma gcd_is_Max_divisors_nat:
|
nipkow@31734
|
539 |
"m ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> n ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (m::nat) n = (Max {d. d dvd m & d dvd n})"
|
nipkow@31734
|
540 |
apply(rule Max_eqI[THEN sym])
|
nipkow@31995
|
541 |
apply (metis finite_Collect_conjI finite_divisors_nat)
|
nipkow@31734
|
542 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@31952
|
543 |
apply(metis Suc_diff_1 Suc_neq_Zero dvd_imp_le gcd_greatest_iff_nat gcd_pos_nat)
|
nipkow@31734
|
544 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@31734
|
545 |
done
|
nipkow@31734
|
546 |
|
nipkow@31734
|
547 |
lemma gcd_is_Max_divisors_int:
|
nipkow@31734
|
548 |
"m ~= 0 ==> n ~= 0 ==> gcd (m::int) n = (Max {d. d dvd m & d dvd n})"
|
nipkow@31734
|
549 |
apply(rule Max_eqI[THEN sym])
|
nipkow@31995
|
550 |
apply (metis finite_Collect_conjI finite_divisors_int)
|
nipkow@31734
|
551 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@31952
|
552 |
apply (metis gcd_greatest_iff_int gcd_pos_int zdvd_imp_le)
|
nipkow@31734
|
553 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@31734
|
554 |
done
|
nipkow@31734
|
555 |
|
haftmann@34028
|
556 |
lemma gcd_code_int [code]:
|
haftmann@34028
|
557 |
"gcd k l = \<bar>if l = (0::int) then k else gcd l (\<bar>k\<bar> mod \<bar>l\<bar>)\<bar>"
|
haftmann@34028
|
558 |
by (simp add: gcd_int_def nat_mod_distrib gcd_non_0_nat)
|
haftmann@34028
|
559 |
|
huffman@31704
|
560 |
|
huffman@31704
|
561 |
subsection {* Coprimality *}
|
huffman@31704
|
562 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
563 |
lemma div_gcd_coprime_nat:
|
huffman@31704
|
564 |
assumes nz: "(a::nat) \<noteq> 0 \<or> b \<noteq> 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
565 |
shows "coprime (a div gcd a b) (b div gcd a b)"
|
wenzelm@22367
|
566 |
proof -
|
haftmann@27556
|
567 |
let ?g = "gcd a b"
|
chaieb@22027
|
568 |
let ?a' = "a div ?g"
|
chaieb@22027
|
569 |
let ?b' = "b div ?g"
|
haftmann@27556
|
570 |
let ?g' = "gcd ?a' ?b'"
|
chaieb@22027
|
571 |
have dvdg: "?g dvd a" "?g dvd b" by simp_all
|
chaieb@22027
|
572 |
have dvdg': "?g' dvd ?a'" "?g' dvd ?b'" by simp_all
|
wenzelm@22367
|
573 |
from dvdg dvdg' obtain ka kb ka' kb' where
|
wenzelm@22367
|
574 |
kab: "a = ?g * ka" "b = ?g * kb" "?a' = ?g' * ka'" "?b' = ?g' * kb'"
|
chaieb@22027
|
575 |
unfolding dvd_def by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
576 |
then have "?g * ?a' = (?g * ?g') * ka'" "?g * ?b' = (?g * ?g') * kb'"
|
huffman@31704
|
577 |
by simp_all
|
wenzelm@22367
|
578 |
then have dvdgg':"?g * ?g' dvd a" "?g* ?g' dvd b"
|
wenzelm@22367
|
579 |
by (auto simp add: dvd_mult_div_cancel [OF dvdg(1)]
|
wenzelm@22367
|
580 |
dvd_mult_div_cancel [OF dvdg(2)] dvd_def)
|
huffman@35208
|
581 |
have "?g \<noteq> 0" using nz by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
582 |
then have gp: "?g > 0" by arith
|
nipkow@31952
|
583 |
from gcd_greatest_nat [OF dvdgg'] have "?g * ?g' dvd ?g" .
|
wenzelm@22367
|
584 |
with dvd_mult_cancel1 [OF gp] show "?g' = 1" by simp
|
chaieb@22027
|
585 |
qed
|
chaieb@22027
|
586 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
587 |
lemma div_gcd_coprime_int:
|
huffman@31704
|
588 |
assumes nz: "(a::int) \<noteq> 0 \<or> b \<noteq> 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
589 |
shows "coprime (a div gcd a b) (b div gcd a b)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
590 |
apply (subst (1 2 3) gcd_abs_int)
|
nipkow@31813
|
591 |
apply (subst (1 2) abs_div)
|
nipkow@31813
|
592 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@31813
|
593 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@31813
|
594 |
apply(subst (1 2) abs_gcd_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
595 |
apply (rule div_gcd_coprime_nat [transferred])
|
nipkow@31952
|
596 |
using nz apply (auto simp add: gcd_abs_int [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
597 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
598 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
599 |
lemma coprime_nat: "coprime (a::nat) b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>d. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<longleftrightarrow> d = 1)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
600 |
using gcd_unique_nat[of 1 a b, simplified] by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
601 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
602 |
lemma coprime_Suc_0_nat:
|
huffman@31704
|
603 |
"coprime (a::nat) b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>d. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<longleftrightarrow> d = Suc 0)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
604 |
using coprime_nat by (simp add: One_nat_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
605 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
606 |
lemma coprime_int: "coprime (a::int) b \<longleftrightarrow>
|
huffman@31704
|
607 |
(\<forall>d. d >= 0 \<and> d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<longleftrightarrow> d = 1)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
608 |
using gcd_unique_int [of 1 a b]
|
huffman@31704
|
609 |
apply clarsimp
|
huffman@31704
|
610 |
apply (erule subst)
|
huffman@31704
|
611 |
apply (rule iffI)
|
huffman@31704
|
612 |
apply force
|
huffman@31704
|
613 |
apply (drule_tac x = "abs e" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
614 |
apply (case_tac "e >= 0")
|
huffman@31704
|
615 |
apply force
|
huffman@31704
|
616 |
apply force
|
huffman@31704
|
617 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
618 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
619 |
lemma gcd_coprime_nat:
|
huffman@31704
|
620 |
assumes z: "gcd (a::nat) b \<noteq> 0" and a: "a = a' * gcd a b" and
|
huffman@31704
|
621 |
b: "b = b' * gcd a b"
|
huffman@31704
|
622 |
shows "coprime a' b'"
|
huffman@31704
|
623 |
|
huffman@31704
|
624 |
apply (subgoal_tac "a' = a div gcd a b")
|
huffman@31704
|
625 |
apply (erule ssubst)
|
huffman@31704
|
626 |
apply (subgoal_tac "b' = b div gcd a b")
|
huffman@31704
|
627 |
apply (erule ssubst)
|
nipkow@31952
|
628 |
apply (rule div_gcd_coprime_nat)
|
wenzelm@41798
|
629 |
using z apply force
|
huffman@31704
|
630 |
apply (subst (1) b)
|
huffman@31704
|
631 |
using z apply force
|
huffman@31704
|
632 |
apply (subst (1) a)
|
huffman@31704
|
633 |
using z apply force
|
wenzelm@41798
|
634 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
635 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
636 |
lemma gcd_coprime_int:
|
huffman@31704
|
637 |
assumes z: "gcd (a::int) b \<noteq> 0" and a: "a = a' * gcd a b" and
|
huffman@31704
|
638 |
b: "b = b' * gcd a b"
|
huffman@31704
|
639 |
shows "coprime a' b'"
|
huffman@31704
|
640 |
|
huffman@31704
|
641 |
apply (subgoal_tac "a' = a div gcd a b")
|
huffman@31704
|
642 |
apply (erule ssubst)
|
huffman@31704
|
643 |
apply (subgoal_tac "b' = b div gcd a b")
|
huffman@31704
|
644 |
apply (erule ssubst)
|
nipkow@31952
|
645 |
apply (rule div_gcd_coprime_int)
|
wenzelm@41798
|
646 |
using z apply force
|
huffman@31704
|
647 |
apply (subst (1) b)
|
huffman@31704
|
648 |
using z apply force
|
huffman@31704
|
649 |
apply (subst (1) a)
|
huffman@31704
|
650 |
using z apply force
|
wenzelm@41798
|
651 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
652 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
653 |
lemma coprime_mult_nat: assumes da: "coprime (d::nat) a" and db: "coprime d b"
|
huffman@31704
|
654 |
shows "coprime d (a * b)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
655 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
656 |
using da apply (subst gcd_mult_cancel_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
657 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_nat, assumption)
|
nipkow@31952
|
658 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_nat, rule db)
|
huffman@31704
|
659 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
660 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
661 |
lemma coprime_mult_int: assumes da: "coprime (d::int) a" and db: "coprime d b"
|
huffman@31704
|
662 |
shows "coprime d (a * b)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
663 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
664 |
using da apply (subst gcd_mult_cancel_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
665 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_int, assumption)
|
nipkow@31952
|
666 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_int, rule db)
|
huffman@31704
|
667 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
668 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
669 |
lemma coprime_lmult_nat:
|
huffman@31704
|
670 |
assumes dab: "coprime (d::nat) (a * b)" shows "coprime d a"
|
huffman@31704
|
671 |
proof -
|
huffman@31704
|
672 |
have "gcd d a dvd gcd d (a * b)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
673 |
by (rule gcd_greatest_nat, auto)
|
huffman@31704
|
674 |
with dab show ?thesis
|
huffman@31704
|
675 |
by auto
|
chaieb@27669
|
676 |
qed
|
chaieb@27669
|
677 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
678 |
lemma coprime_lmult_int:
|
nipkow@31796
|
679 |
assumes "coprime (d::int) (a * b)" shows "coprime d a"
|
huffman@31704
|
680 |
proof -
|
huffman@31704
|
681 |
have "gcd d a dvd gcd d (a * b)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
682 |
by (rule gcd_greatest_int, auto)
|
nipkow@31796
|
683 |
with assms show ?thesis
|
huffman@31704
|
684 |
by auto
|
chaieb@27669
|
685 |
qed
|
chaieb@27669
|
686 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
687 |
lemma coprime_rmult_nat:
|
nipkow@31796
|
688 |
assumes "coprime (d::nat) (a * b)" shows "coprime d b"
|
huffman@31704
|
689 |
proof -
|
huffman@31704
|
690 |
have "gcd d b dvd gcd d (a * b)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
691 |
by (rule gcd_greatest_nat, auto intro: dvd_mult)
|
nipkow@31796
|
692 |
with assms show ?thesis
|
huffman@31704
|
693 |
by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
694 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
695 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
696 |
lemma coprime_rmult_int:
|
huffman@31704
|
697 |
assumes dab: "coprime (d::int) (a * b)" shows "coprime d b"
|
huffman@31704
|
698 |
proof -
|
huffman@31704
|
699 |
have "gcd d b dvd gcd d (a * b)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
700 |
by (rule gcd_greatest_int, auto intro: dvd_mult)
|
huffman@31704
|
701 |
with dab show ?thesis
|
huffman@31704
|
702 |
by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
703 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
704 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
705 |
lemma coprime_mul_eq_nat: "coprime (d::nat) (a * b) \<longleftrightarrow>
|
huffman@31704
|
706 |
coprime d a \<and> coprime d b"
|
nipkow@31952
|
707 |
using coprime_rmult_nat[of d a b] coprime_lmult_nat[of d a b]
|
nipkow@31952
|
708 |
coprime_mult_nat[of d a b]
|
huffman@31704
|
709 |
by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
710 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
711 |
lemma coprime_mul_eq_int: "coprime (d::int) (a * b) \<longleftrightarrow>
|
huffman@31704
|
712 |
coprime d a \<and> coprime d b"
|
nipkow@31952
|
713 |
using coprime_rmult_int[of d a b] coprime_lmult_int[of d a b]
|
nipkow@31952
|
714 |
coprime_mult_int[of d a b]
|
huffman@31704
|
715 |
by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
716 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
717 |
lemma gcd_coprime_exists_nat:
|
huffman@31704
|
718 |
assumes nz: "gcd (a::nat) b \<noteq> 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
719 |
shows "\<exists>a' b'. a = a' * gcd a b \<and> b = b' * gcd a b \<and> coprime a' b'"
|
huffman@31704
|
720 |
apply (rule_tac x = "a div gcd a b" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
721 |
apply (rule_tac x = "b div gcd a b" in exI)
|
nipkow@31952
|
722 |
using nz apply (auto simp add: div_gcd_coprime_nat dvd_div_mult)
|
huffman@31704
|
723 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
724 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
725 |
lemma gcd_coprime_exists_int:
|
huffman@31704
|
726 |
assumes nz: "gcd (a::int) b \<noteq> 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
727 |
shows "\<exists>a' b'. a = a' * gcd a b \<and> b = b' * gcd a b \<and> coprime a' b'"
|
huffman@31704
|
728 |
apply (rule_tac x = "a div gcd a b" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
729 |
apply (rule_tac x = "b div gcd a b" in exI)
|
nipkow@31952
|
730 |
using nz apply (auto simp add: div_gcd_coprime_int dvd_div_mult_self)
|
huffman@31704
|
731 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
732 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
733 |
lemma coprime_exp_nat: "coprime (d::nat) a \<Longrightarrow> coprime d (a^n)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
734 |
by (induct n, simp_all add: coprime_mult_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
735 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
736 |
lemma coprime_exp_int: "coprime (d::int) a \<Longrightarrow> coprime d (a^n)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
737 |
by (induct n, simp_all add: coprime_mult_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
738 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
739 |
lemma coprime_exp2_nat [intro]: "coprime (a::nat) b \<Longrightarrow> coprime (a^n) (b^m)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
740 |
apply (rule coprime_exp_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
741 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
742 |
apply (rule coprime_exp_nat)
|
nipkow@31952
|
743 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_nat, assumption)
|
huffman@31704
|
744 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
745 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
746 |
lemma coprime_exp2_int [intro]: "coprime (a::int) b \<Longrightarrow> coprime (a^n) (b^m)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
747 |
apply (rule coprime_exp_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
748 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
749 |
apply (rule coprime_exp_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
750 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_int, assumption)
|
huffman@31704
|
751 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
752 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
753 |
lemma gcd_exp_nat: "gcd ((a::nat)^n) (b^n) = (gcd a b)^n"
|
huffman@31704
|
754 |
proof (cases)
|
huffman@31704
|
755 |
assume "a = 0 & b = 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
756 |
thus ?thesis by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
757 |
next assume "~(a = 0 & b = 0)"
|
huffman@31704
|
758 |
hence "coprime ((a div gcd a b)^n) ((b div gcd a b)^n)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
759 |
by (auto simp:div_gcd_coprime_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
760 |
hence "gcd ((a div gcd a b)^n * (gcd a b)^n)
|
huffman@31704
|
761 |
((b div gcd a b)^n * (gcd a b)^n) = (gcd a b)^n"
|
huffman@31704
|
762 |
apply (subst (1 2) mult_commute)
|
nipkow@31952
|
763 |
apply (subst gcd_mult_distrib_nat [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
764 |
apply simp
|
huffman@31704
|
765 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
766 |
also have "(a div gcd a b)^n * (gcd a b)^n = a^n"
|
huffman@31704
|
767 |
apply (subst div_power)
|
huffman@31704
|
768 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
769 |
apply (rule dvd_div_mult_self)
|
huffman@31704
|
770 |
apply (rule dvd_power_same)
|
huffman@31704
|
771 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
772 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
773 |
also have "(b div gcd a b)^n * (gcd a b)^n = b^n"
|
huffman@31704
|
774 |
apply (subst div_power)
|
huffman@31704
|
775 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
776 |
apply (rule dvd_div_mult_self)
|
huffman@31704
|
777 |
apply (rule dvd_power_same)
|
huffman@31704
|
778 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
779 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
780 |
finally show ?thesis .
|
huffman@31704
|
781 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
782 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
783 |
lemma gcd_exp_int: "gcd ((a::int)^n) (b^n) = (gcd a b)^n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
784 |
apply (subst (1 2) gcd_abs_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
785 |
apply (subst (1 2) power_abs)
|
nipkow@31952
|
786 |
apply (rule gcd_exp_nat [where n = n, transferred])
|
huffman@31704
|
787 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
788 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
789 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
790 |
lemma division_decomp_nat: assumes dc: "(a::nat) dvd b * c"
|
huffman@31704
|
791 |
shows "\<exists>b' c'. a = b' * c' \<and> b' dvd b \<and> c' dvd c"
|
huffman@31704
|
792 |
proof-
|
huffman@31704
|
793 |
let ?g = "gcd a b"
|
huffman@31704
|
794 |
{assume "?g = 0" with dc have ?thesis by auto}
|
huffman@31704
|
795 |
moreover
|
huffman@31704
|
796 |
{assume z: "?g \<noteq> 0"
|
nipkow@31952
|
797 |
from gcd_coprime_exists_nat[OF z]
|
huffman@31704
|
798 |
obtain a' b' where ab': "a = a' * ?g" "b = b' * ?g" "coprime a' b'"
|
huffman@31704
|
799 |
by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
800 |
have thb: "?g dvd b" by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
801 |
from ab'(1) have "a' dvd a" unfolding dvd_def by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
802 |
with dc have th0: "a' dvd b*c" using dvd_trans[of a' a "b*c"] by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
803 |
from dc ab'(1,2) have "a'*?g dvd (b'*?g) *c" by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
804 |
hence "?g*a' dvd ?g * (b' * c)" by (simp add: mult_assoc)
|
huffman@31704
|
805 |
with z have th_1: "a' dvd b' * c" by auto
|
nipkow@31952
|
806 |
from coprime_dvd_mult_nat[OF ab'(3)] th_1
|
huffman@31704
|
807 |
have thc: "a' dvd c" by (subst (asm) mult_commute, blast)
|
huffman@31704
|
808 |
from ab' have "a = ?g*a'" by algebra
|
huffman@31704
|
809 |
with thb thc have ?thesis by blast }
|
huffman@31704
|
810 |
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
811 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
812 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
813 |
lemma division_decomp_int: assumes dc: "(a::int) dvd b * c"
|
huffman@31704
|
814 |
shows "\<exists>b' c'. a = b' * c' \<and> b' dvd b \<and> c' dvd c"
|
huffman@31704
|
815 |
proof-
|
huffman@31704
|
816 |
let ?g = "gcd a b"
|
huffman@31704
|
817 |
{assume "?g = 0" with dc have ?thesis by auto}
|
huffman@31704
|
818 |
moreover
|
huffman@31704
|
819 |
{assume z: "?g \<noteq> 0"
|
nipkow@31952
|
820 |
from gcd_coprime_exists_int[OF z]
|
huffman@31704
|
821 |
obtain a' b' where ab': "a = a' * ?g" "b = b' * ?g" "coprime a' b'"
|
huffman@31704
|
822 |
by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
823 |
have thb: "?g dvd b" by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
824 |
from ab'(1) have "a' dvd a" unfolding dvd_def by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
825 |
with dc have th0: "a' dvd b*c"
|
huffman@31704
|
826 |
using dvd_trans[of a' a "b*c"] by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
827 |
from dc ab'(1,2) have "a'*?g dvd (b'*?g) *c" by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
828 |
hence "?g*a' dvd ?g * (b' * c)" by (simp add: mult_assoc)
|
huffman@31704
|
829 |
with z have th_1: "a' dvd b' * c" by auto
|
nipkow@31952
|
830 |
from coprime_dvd_mult_int[OF ab'(3)] th_1
|
huffman@31704
|
831 |
have thc: "a' dvd c" by (subst (asm) mult_commute, blast)
|
huffman@31704
|
832 |
from ab' have "a = ?g*a'" by algebra
|
huffman@31704
|
833 |
with thb thc have ?thesis by blast }
|
huffman@31704
|
834 |
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
835 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
836 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
837 |
lemma pow_divides_pow_nat:
|
huffman@31704
|
838 |
assumes ab: "(a::nat) ^ n dvd b ^n" and n:"n \<noteq> 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
839 |
shows "a dvd b"
|
huffman@31704
|
840 |
proof-
|
huffman@31704
|
841 |
let ?g = "gcd a b"
|
huffman@31704
|
842 |
from n obtain m where m: "n = Suc m" by (cases n, simp_all)
|
huffman@31704
|
843 |
{assume "?g = 0" with ab n have ?thesis by auto }
|
huffman@31704
|
844 |
moreover
|
huffman@31704
|
845 |
{assume z: "?g \<noteq> 0"
|
huffman@35208
|
846 |
hence zn: "?g ^ n \<noteq> 0" using n by simp
|
nipkow@31952
|
847 |
from gcd_coprime_exists_nat[OF z]
|
huffman@31704
|
848 |
obtain a' b' where ab': "a = a' * ?g" "b = b' * ?g" "coprime a' b'"
|
huffman@31704
|
849 |
by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
850 |
from ab have "(a' * ?g) ^ n dvd (b' * ?g)^n"
|
huffman@31704
|
851 |
by (simp add: ab'(1,2)[symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
852 |
hence "?g^n*a'^n dvd ?g^n *b'^n"
|
huffman@31704
|
853 |
by (simp only: power_mult_distrib mult_commute)
|
huffman@31704
|
854 |
with zn z n have th0:"a'^n dvd b'^n" by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
855 |
have "a' dvd a'^n" by (simp add: m)
|
huffman@31704
|
856 |
with th0 have "a' dvd b'^n" using dvd_trans[of a' "a'^n" "b'^n"] by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
857 |
hence th1: "a' dvd b'^m * b'" by (simp add: m mult_commute)
|
nipkow@31952
|
858 |
from coprime_dvd_mult_nat[OF coprime_exp_nat [OF ab'(3), of m]] th1
|
huffman@31704
|
859 |
have "a' dvd b'" by (subst (asm) mult_commute, blast)
|
huffman@31704
|
860 |
hence "a'*?g dvd b'*?g" by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
861 |
with ab'(1,2) have ?thesis by simp }
|
huffman@31704
|
862 |
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
863 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
864 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
865 |
lemma pow_divides_pow_int:
|
huffman@31704
|
866 |
assumes ab: "(a::int) ^ n dvd b ^n" and n:"n \<noteq> 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
867 |
shows "a dvd b"
|
huffman@31704
|
868 |
proof-
|
huffman@31704
|
869 |
let ?g = "gcd a b"
|
huffman@31704
|
870 |
from n obtain m where m: "n = Suc m" by (cases n, simp_all)
|
huffman@31704
|
871 |
{assume "?g = 0" with ab n have ?thesis by auto }
|
huffman@31704
|
872 |
moreover
|
huffman@31704
|
873 |
{assume z: "?g \<noteq> 0"
|
huffman@35208
|
874 |
hence zn: "?g ^ n \<noteq> 0" using n by simp
|
nipkow@31952
|
875 |
from gcd_coprime_exists_int[OF z]
|
huffman@31704
|
876 |
obtain a' b' where ab': "a = a' * ?g" "b = b' * ?g" "coprime a' b'"
|
huffman@31704
|
877 |
by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
878 |
from ab have "(a' * ?g) ^ n dvd (b' * ?g)^n"
|
huffman@31704
|
879 |
by (simp add: ab'(1,2)[symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
880 |
hence "?g^n*a'^n dvd ?g^n *b'^n"
|
huffman@31704
|
881 |
by (simp only: power_mult_distrib mult_commute)
|
huffman@31704
|
882 |
with zn z n have th0:"a'^n dvd b'^n" by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
883 |
have "a' dvd a'^n" by (simp add: m)
|
huffman@31704
|
884 |
with th0 have "a' dvd b'^n"
|
huffman@31704
|
885 |
using dvd_trans[of a' "a'^n" "b'^n"] by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
886 |
hence th1: "a' dvd b'^m * b'" by (simp add: m mult_commute)
|
nipkow@31952
|
887 |
from coprime_dvd_mult_int[OF coprime_exp_int [OF ab'(3), of m]] th1
|
huffman@31704
|
888 |
have "a' dvd b'" by (subst (asm) mult_commute, blast)
|
huffman@31704
|
889 |
hence "a'*?g dvd b'*?g" by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
890 |
with ab'(1,2) have ?thesis by simp }
|
huffman@31704
|
891 |
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
892 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
893 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
894 |
lemma pow_divides_eq_nat [simp]: "n ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((a::nat)^n dvd b^n) = (a dvd b)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
895 |
by (auto intro: pow_divides_pow_nat dvd_power_same)
|
huffman@31704
|
896 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
897 |
lemma pow_divides_eq_int [simp]: "n ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((a::int)^n dvd b^n) = (a dvd b)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
898 |
by (auto intro: pow_divides_pow_int dvd_power_same)
|
huffman@31704
|
899 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
900 |
lemma divides_mult_nat:
|
huffman@31704
|
901 |
assumes mr: "(m::nat) dvd r" and nr: "n dvd r" and mn:"coprime m n"
|
huffman@31704
|
902 |
shows "m * n dvd r"
|
huffman@31704
|
903 |
proof-
|
huffman@31704
|
904 |
from mr nr obtain m' n' where m': "r = m*m'" and n': "r = n*n'"
|
huffman@31704
|
905 |
unfolding dvd_def by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
906 |
from mr n' have "m dvd n'*n" by (simp add: mult_commute)
|
nipkow@31952
|
907 |
hence "m dvd n'" using coprime_dvd_mult_iff_nat[OF mn] by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
908 |
then obtain k where k: "n' = m*k" unfolding dvd_def by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
909 |
from n' k show ?thesis unfolding dvd_def by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
910 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
911 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
912 |
lemma divides_mult_int:
|
huffman@31704
|
913 |
assumes mr: "(m::int) dvd r" and nr: "n dvd r" and mn:"coprime m n"
|
huffman@31704
|
914 |
shows "m * n dvd r"
|
huffman@31704
|
915 |
proof-
|
huffman@31704
|
916 |
from mr nr obtain m' n' where m': "r = m*m'" and n': "r = n*n'"
|
huffman@31704
|
917 |
unfolding dvd_def by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
918 |
from mr n' have "m dvd n'*n" by (simp add: mult_commute)
|
nipkow@31952
|
919 |
hence "m dvd n'" using coprime_dvd_mult_iff_int[OF mn] by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
920 |
then obtain k where k: "n' = m*k" unfolding dvd_def by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
921 |
from n' k show ?thesis unfolding dvd_def by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
922 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
923 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
924 |
lemma coprime_plus_one_nat [simp]: "coprime ((n::nat) + 1) n"
|
huffman@31704
|
925 |
apply (subgoal_tac "gcd (n + 1) n dvd (n + 1 - n)")
|
huffman@31704
|
926 |
apply force
|
nipkow@31952
|
927 |
apply (rule dvd_diff_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
928 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
929 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
930 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
931 |
lemma coprime_Suc_nat [simp]: "coprime (Suc n) n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
932 |
using coprime_plus_one_nat by (simp add: One_nat_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
933 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
934 |
lemma coprime_plus_one_int [simp]: "coprime ((n::int) + 1) n"
|
huffman@31704
|
935 |
apply (subgoal_tac "gcd (n + 1) n dvd (n + 1 - n)")
|
huffman@31704
|
936 |
apply force
|
huffman@31704
|
937 |
apply (rule dvd_diff)
|
huffman@31704
|
938 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
939 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
940 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
941 |
lemma coprime_minus_one_nat: "(n::nat) \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> coprime (n - 1) n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
942 |
using coprime_plus_one_nat [of "n - 1"]
|
nipkow@31952
|
943 |
gcd_commute_nat [of "n - 1" n] by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
944 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
945 |
lemma coprime_minus_one_int: "coprime ((n::int) - 1) n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
946 |
using coprime_plus_one_int [of "n - 1"]
|
nipkow@31952
|
947 |
gcd_commute_int [of "n - 1" n] by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
948 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
949 |
lemma setprod_coprime_nat [rule_format]:
|
huffman@31704
|
950 |
"(ALL i: A. coprime (f i) (x::nat)) --> coprime (PROD i:A. f i) x"
|
huffman@31704
|
951 |
apply (case_tac "finite A")
|
huffman@31704
|
952 |
apply (induct set: finite)
|
nipkow@31952
|
953 |
apply (auto simp add: gcd_mult_cancel_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
954 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
955 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
956 |
lemma setprod_coprime_int [rule_format]:
|
huffman@31704
|
957 |
"(ALL i: A. coprime (f i) (x::int)) --> coprime (PROD i:A. f i) x"
|
huffman@31704
|
958 |
apply (case_tac "finite A")
|
huffman@31704
|
959 |
apply (induct set: finite)
|
nipkow@31952
|
960 |
apply (auto simp add: gcd_mult_cancel_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
961 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
962 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
963 |
lemma coprime_common_divisor_nat: "coprime (a::nat) b \<Longrightarrow> x dvd a \<Longrightarrow>
|
huffman@31704
|
964 |
x dvd b \<Longrightarrow> x = 1"
|
huffman@31704
|
965 |
apply (subgoal_tac "x dvd gcd a b")
|
huffman@31704
|
966 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@31952
|
967 |
apply (erule (1) gcd_greatest_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
968 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
969 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
970 |
lemma coprime_common_divisor_int: "coprime (a::int) b \<Longrightarrow> x dvd a \<Longrightarrow>
|
huffman@31704
|
971 |
x dvd b \<Longrightarrow> abs x = 1"
|
huffman@31704
|
972 |
apply (subgoal_tac "x dvd gcd a b")
|
huffman@31704
|
973 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@31952
|
974 |
apply (erule (1) gcd_greatest_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
975 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
976 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
977 |
lemma coprime_divisors_nat: "(d::int) dvd a \<Longrightarrow> e dvd b \<Longrightarrow> coprime a b \<Longrightarrow>
|
huffman@31704
|
978 |
coprime d e"
|
huffman@31704
|
979 |
apply (auto simp add: dvd_def)
|
nipkow@31952
|
980 |
apply (frule coprime_lmult_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
981 |
apply (subst gcd_commute_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
982 |
apply (subst (asm) (2) gcd_commute_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
983 |
apply (erule coprime_lmult_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
984 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
985 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
986 |
lemma invertible_coprime_nat: "(x::nat) * y mod m = 1 \<Longrightarrow> coprime x m"
|
nipkow@31952
|
987 |
apply (metis coprime_lmult_nat gcd_1_nat gcd_commute_nat gcd_red_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
988 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
989 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
990 |
lemma invertible_coprime_int: "(x::int) * y mod m = 1 \<Longrightarrow> coprime x m"
|
nipkow@31952
|
991 |
apply (metis coprime_lmult_int gcd_1_int gcd_commute_int gcd_red_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
992 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
993 |
|
huffman@31704
|
994 |
|
huffman@31704
|
995 |
subsection {* Bezout's theorem *}
|
huffman@31704
|
996 |
|
huffman@31704
|
997 |
(* Function bezw returns a pair of witnesses to Bezout's theorem --
|
huffman@31704
|
998 |
see the theorems that follow the definition. *)
|
huffman@31704
|
999 |
fun
|
huffman@31704
|
1000 |
bezw :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> int * int"
|
huffman@31704
|
1001 |
where
|
huffman@31704
|
1002 |
"bezw x y =
|
huffman@31704
|
1003 |
(if y = 0 then (1, 0) else
|
huffman@31704
|
1004 |
(snd (bezw y (x mod y)),
|
huffman@31704
|
1005 |
fst (bezw y (x mod y)) - snd (bezw y (x mod y)) * int(x div y)))"
|
huffman@31704
|
1006 |
|
huffman@31704
|
1007 |
lemma bezw_0 [simp]: "bezw x 0 = (1, 0)" by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
1008 |
|
huffman@31704
|
1009 |
lemma bezw_non_0: "y > 0 \<Longrightarrow> bezw x y = (snd (bezw y (x mod y)),
|
huffman@31704
|
1010 |
fst (bezw y (x mod y)) - snd (bezw y (x mod y)) * int(x div y))"
|
huffman@31704
|
1011 |
by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
1012 |
|
huffman@31704
|
1013 |
declare bezw.simps [simp del]
|
huffman@31704
|
1014 |
|
huffman@31704
|
1015 |
lemma bezw_aux [rule_format]:
|
huffman@31704
|
1016 |
"fst (bezw x y) * int x + snd (bezw x y) * int y = int (gcd x y)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1017 |
proof (induct x y rule: gcd_nat_induct)
|
huffman@31704
|
1018 |
fix m :: nat
|
huffman@31704
|
1019 |
show "fst (bezw m 0) * int m + snd (bezw m 0) * int 0 = int (gcd m 0)"
|
huffman@31704
|
1020 |
by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1021 |
next fix m :: nat and n
|
huffman@31704
|
1022 |
assume ngt0: "n > 0" and
|
huffman@31704
|
1023 |
ih: "fst (bezw n (m mod n)) * int n +
|
huffman@31704
|
1024 |
snd (bezw n (m mod n)) * int (m mod n) =
|
huffman@31704
|
1025 |
int (gcd n (m mod n))"
|
huffman@31704
|
1026 |
thus "fst (bezw m n) * int m + snd (bezw m n) * int n = int (gcd m n)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1027 |
apply (simp add: bezw_non_0 gcd_non_0_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
1028 |
apply (erule subst)
|
haftmann@36349
|
1029 |
apply (simp add: field_simps)
|
huffman@31704
|
1030 |
apply (subst mod_div_equality [of m n, symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
1031 |
(* applying simp here undoes the last substitution!
|
huffman@31704
|
1032 |
what is procedure cancel_div_mod? *)
|
huffman@45692
|
1033 |
apply (simp only: field_simps of_nat_add of_nat_mult)
|
huffman@31704
|
1034 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1035 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
1036 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1037 |
lemma bezout_int:
|
huffman@31704
|
1038 |
fixes x y
|
huffman@31704
|
1039 |
shows "EX u v. u * (x::int) + v * y = gcd x y"
|
huffman@31704
|
1040 |
proof -
|
huffman@31704
|
1041 |
have bezout_aux: "!!x y. x \<ge> (0::int) \<Longrightarrow> y \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow>
|
huffman@31704
|
1042 |
EX u v. u * x + v * y = gcd x y"
|
huffman@31704
|
1043 |
apply (rule_tac x = "fst (bezw (nat x) (nat y))" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1044 |
apply (rule_tac x = "snd (bezw (nat x) (nat y))" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1045 |
apply (unfold gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
1046 |
apply simp
|
huffman@31704
|
1047 |
apply (subst bezw_aux [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
1048 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1049 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1050 |
have "(x \<ge> 0 \<and> y \<ge> 0) | (x \<ge> 0 \<and> y \<le> 0) | (x \<le> 0 \<and> y \<ge> 0) |
|
huffman@31704
|
1051 |
(x \<le> 0 \<and> y \<le> 0)"
|
huffman@31704
|
1052 |
by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1053 |
moreover have "x \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow> y \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
|
huffman@31704
|
1054 |
by (erule (1) bezout_aux)
|
huffman@31704
|
1055 |
moreover have "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
|
huffman@31704
|
1056 |
apply (insert bezout_aux [of x "-y"])
|
huffman@31704
|
1057 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1058 |
apply (rule_tac x = u in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1059 |
apply (rule_tac x = "-v" in exI)
|
nipkow@31952
|
1060 |
apply (subst gcd_neg2_int [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
1061 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1062 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1063 |
moreover have "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
|
huffman@31704
|
1064 |
apply (insert bezout_aux [of "-x" y])
|
huffman@31704
|
1065 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1066 |
apply (rule_tac x = "-u" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1067 |
apply (rule_tac x = v in exI)
|
nipkow@31952
|
1068 |
apply (subst gcd_neg1_int [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
1069 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1070 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1071 |
moreover have "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
|
huffman@31704
|
1072 |
apply (insert bezout_aux [of "-x" "-y"])
|
huffman@31704
|
1073 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1074 |
apply (rule_tac x = "-u" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1075 |
apply (rule_tac x = "-v" in exI)
|
nipkow@31952
|
1076 |
apply (subst gcd_neg1_int [symmetric])
|
nipkow@31952
|
1077 |
apply (subst gcd_neg2_int [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
1078 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1079 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1080 |
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
1081 |
qed
|
huffman@31704
|
1082 |
|
huffman@31704
|
1083 |
text {* versions of Bezout for nat, by Amine Chaieb *}
|
huffman@31704
|
1084 |
|
huffman@31704
|
1085 |
lemma ind_euclid:
|
huffman@31704
|
1086 |
assumes c: " \<forall>a b. P (a::nat) b \<longleftrightarrow> P b a" and z: "\<forall>a. P a 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
1087 |
and add: "\<forall>a b. P a b \<longrightarrow> P a (a + b)"
|
chaieb@27669
|
1088 |
shows "P a b"
|
berghofe@34915
|
1089 |
proof(induct "a + b" arbitrary: a b rule: less_induct)
|
berghofe@34915
|
1090 |
case less
|
chaieb@27669
|
1091 |
have "a = b \<or> a < b \<or> b < a" by arith
|
chaieb@27669
|
1092 |
moreover {assume eq: "a= b"
|
huffman@31704
|
1093 |
from add[rule_format, OF z[rule_format, of a]] have "P a b" using eq
|
huffman@31704
|
1094 |
by simp}
|
chaieb@27669
|
1095 |
moreover
|
chaieb@27669
|
1096 |
{assume lt: "a < b"
|
berghofe@34915
|
1097 |
hence "a + b - a < a + b \<or> a = 0" by arith
|
chaieb@27669
|
1098 |
moreover
|
chaieb@27669
|
1099 |
{assume "a =0" with z c have "P a b" by blast }
|
chaieb@27669
|
1100 |
moreover
|
berghofe@34915
|
1101 |
{assume "a + b - a < a + b"
|
berghofe@34915
|
1102 |
also have th0: "a + b - a = a + (b - a)" using lt by arith
|
berghofe@34915
|
1103 |
finally have "a + (b - a) < a + b" .
|
berghofe@34915
|
1104 |
then have "P a (a + (b - a))" by (rule add[rule_format, OF less])
|
berghofe@34915
|
1105 |
then have "P a b" by (simp add: th0[symmetric])}
|
chaieb@27669
|
1106 |
ultimately have "P a b" by blast}
|
chaieb@27669
|
1107 |
moreover
|
chaieb@27669
|
1108 |
{assume lt: "a > b"
|
berghofe@34915
|
1109 |
hence "b + a - b < a + b \<or> b = 0" by arith
|
chaieb@27669
|
1110 |
moreover
|
chaieb@27669
|
1111 |
{assume "b =0" with z c have "P a b" by blast }
|
chaieb@27669
|
1112 |
moreover
|
berghofe@34915
|
1113 |
{assume "b + a - b < a + b"
|
berghofe@34915
|
1114 |
also have th0: "b + a - b = b + (a - b)" using lt by arith
|
berghofe@34915
|
1115 |
finally have "b + (a - b) < a + b" .
|
berghofe@34915
|
1116 |
then have "P b (b + (a - b))" by (rule add[rule_format, OF less])
|
berghofe@34915
|
1117 |
then have "P b a" by (simp add: th0[symmetric])
|
chaieb@27669
|
1118 |
hence "P a b" using c by blast }
|
chaieb@27669
|
1119 |
ultimately have "P a b" by blast}
|
chaieb@27669
|
1120 |
ultimately show "P a b" by blast
|
chaieb@27669
|
1121 |
qed
|
chaieb@27669
|
1122 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1123 |
lemma bezout_lemma_nat:
|
huffman@31704
|
1124 |
assumes ex: "\<exists>(d::nat) x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
|
huffman@31704
|
1125 |
(a * x = b * y + d \<or> b * x = a * y + d)"
|
huffman@31704
|
1126 |
shows "\<exists>d x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd a + b \<and>
|
huffman@31704
|
1127 |
(a * x = (a + b) * y + d \<or> (a + b) * x = a * y + d)"
|
huffman@31704
|
1128 |
using ex
|
huffman@31704
|
1129 |
apply clarsimp
|
huffman@35208
|
1130 |
apply (rule_tac x="d" in exI, simp)
|
huffman@31704
|
1131 |
apply (case_tac "a * x = b * y + d" , simp_all)
|
huffman@31704
|
1132 |
apply (rule_tac x="x + y" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1133 |
apply (rule_tac x="y" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1134 |
apply algebra
|
huffman@31704
|
1135 |
apply (rule_tac x="x" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1136 |
apply (rule_tac x="x + y" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1137 |
apply algebra
|
chaieb@27669
|
1138 |
done
|
chaieb@27669
|
1139 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1140 |
lemma bezout_add_nat: "\<exists>(d::nat) x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
|
huffman@31704
|
1141 |
(a * x = b * y + d \<or> b * x = a * y + d)"
|
huffman@31704
|
1142 |
apply(induct a b rule: ind_euclid)
|
huffman@31704
|
1143 |
apply blast
|
huffman@31704
|
1144 |
apply clarify
|
huffman@35208
|
1145 |
apply (rule_tac x="a" in exI, simp)
|
huffman@31704
|
1146 |
apply clarsimp
|
huffman@31704
|
1147 |
apply (rule_tac x="d" in exI)
|
huffman@35208
|
1148 |
apply (case_tac "a * x = b * y + d", simp_all)
|
huffman@31704
|
1149 |
apply (rule_tac x="x+y" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1150 |
apply (rule_tac x="y" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1151 |
apply algebra
|
huffman@31704
|
1152 |
apply (rule_tac x="x" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1153 |
apply (rule_tac x="x+y" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1154 |
apply algebra
|
chaieb@27669
|
1155 |
done
|
chaieb@27669
|
1156 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1157 |
lemma bezout1_nat: "\<exists>(d::nat) x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
|
huffman@31704
|
1158 |
(a * x - b * y = d \<or> b * x - a * y = d)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1159 |
using bezout_add_nat[of a b]
|
huffman@31704
|
1160 |
apply clarsimp
|
huffman@31704
|
1161 |
apply (rule_tac x="d" in exI, simp)
|
huffman@31704
|
1162 |
apply (rule_tac x="x" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1163 |
apply (rule_tac x="y" in exI)
|
huffman@31704
|
1164 |
apply auto
|
chaieb@27669
|
1165 |
done
|
chaieb@27669
|
1166 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1167 |
lemma bezout_add_strong_nat: assumes nz: "a \<noteq> (0::nat)"
|
chaieb@27669
|
1168 |
shows "\<exists>d x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and> a * x = b * y + d"
|
chaieb@27669
|
1169 |
proof-
|
huffman@31704
|
1170 |
from nz have ap: "a > 0" by simp
|
nipkow@31952
|
1171 |
from bezout_add_nat[of a b]
|
huffman@31704
|
1172 |
have "(\<exists>d x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and> a * x = b * y + d) \<or>
|
huffman@31704
|
1173 |
(\<exists>d x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and> b * x = a * y + d)" by blast
|
chaieb@27669
|
1174 |
moreover
|
huffman@31704
|
1175 |
{fix d x y assume H: "d dvd a" "d dvd b" "a * x = b * y + d"
|
huffman@31704
|
1176 |
from H have ?thesis by blast }
|
chaieb@27669
|
1177 |
moreover
|
chaieb@27669
|
1178 |
{fix d x y assume H: "d dvd a" "d dvd b" "b * x = a * y + d"
|
chaieb@27669
|
1179 |
{assume b0: "b = 0" with H have ?thesis by simp}
|
huffman@31704
|
1180 |
moreover
|
chaieb@27669
|
1181 |
{assume b: "b \<noteq> 0" hence bp: "b > 0" by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
1182 |
from b dvd_imp_le [OF H(2)] have "d < b \<or> d = b"
|
huffman@31704
|
1183 |
by auto
|
chaieb@27669
|
1184 |
moreover
|
chaieb@27669
|
1185 |
{assume db: "d=b"
|
wenzelm@41798
|
1186 |
with nz H have ?thesis apply simp
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1187 |
apply (rule exI[where x = b], simp)
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1188 |
apply (rule exI[where x = b])
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1189 |
by (rule exI[where x = "a - 1"], simp add: diff_mult_distrib2)}
|
chaieb@27669
|
1190 |
moreover
|
huffman@31704
|
1191 |
{assume db: "d < b"
|
wenzelm@41798
|
1192 |
{assume "x=0" hence ?thesis using nz H by simp }
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1193 |
moreover
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1194 |
{assume x0: "x \<noteq> 0" hence xp: "x > 0" by simp
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1195 |
from db have "d \<le> b - 1" by simp
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1196 |
hence "d*b \<le> b*(b - 1)" by simp
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1197 |
with xp mult_mono[of "1" "x" "d*b" "b*(b - 1)"]
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1198 |
have dble: "d*b \<le> x*b*(b - 1)" using bp by simp
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1199 |
from H (3) have "d + (b - 1) * (b*x) = d + (b - 1) * (a*y + d)"
|
huffman@31704
|
1200 |
by simp
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1201 |
hence "d + (b - 1) * a * y + (b - 1) * d = d + (b - 1) * b * x"
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1202 |
by (simp only: mult_assoc right_distrib)
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1203 |
hence "a * ((b - 1) * y) + d * (b - 1 + 1) = d + x*b*(b - 1)"
|
huffman@31704
|
1204 |
by algebra
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1205 |
hence "a * ((b - 1) * y) = d + x*b*(b - 1) - d*b" using bp by simp
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1206 |
hence "a * ((b - 1) * y) = d + (x*b*(b - 1) - d*b)"
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1207 |
by (simp only: diff_add_assoc[OF dble, of d, symmetric])
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1208 |
hence "a * ((b - 1) * y) = b*(x*(b - 1) - d) + d"
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1209 |
by (simp only: diff_mult_distrib2 add_commute mult_ac)
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1210 |
hence ?thesis using H(1,2)
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1211 |
apply -
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1212 |
apply (rule exI[where x=d], simp)
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1213 |
apply (rule exI[where x="(b - 1) * y"])
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1214 |
by (rule exI[where x="x*(b - 1) - d"], simp)}
|
wenzelm@32962
|
1215 |
ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
|
chaieb@27669
|
1216 |
ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
|
chaieb@27669
|
1217 |
ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
|
chaieb@27669
|
1218 |
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
|
chaieb@27669
|
1219 |
qed
|
chaieb@27669
|
1220 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1221 |
lemma bezout_nat: assumes a: "(a::nat) \<noteq> 0"
|
chaieb@27669
|
1222 |
shows "\<exists>x y. a * x = b * y + gcd a b"
|
chaieb@27669
|
1223 |
proof-
|
chaieb@27669
|
1224 |
let ?g = "gcd a b"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1225 |
from bezout_add_strong_nat[OF a, of b]
|
chaieb@27669
|
1226 |
obtain d x y where d: "d dvd a" "d dvd b" "a * x = b * y + d" by blast
|
chaieb@27669
|
1227 |
from d(1,2) have "d dvd ?g" by simp
|
chaieb@27669
|
1228 |
then obtain k where k: "?g = d*k" unfolding dvd_def by blast
|
huffman@31704
|
1229 |
from d(3) have "a * x * k = (b * y + d) *k " by auto
|
chaieb@27669
|
1230 |
hence "a * (x * k) = b * (y*k) + ?g" by (algebra add: k)
|
chaieb@27669
|
1231 |
thus ?thesis by blast
|
chaieb@27669
|
1232 |
qed
|
chaieb@27669
|
1233 |
|
chaieb@27669
|
1234 |
|
haftmann@34028
|
1235 |
subsection {* LCM properties *}
|
huffman@31704
|
1236 |
|
haftmann@34028
|
1237 |
lemma lcm_altdef_int [code]: "lcm (a::int) b = (abs a) * (abs b) div gcd a b"
|
huffman@31704
|
1238 |
by (simp add: lcm_int_def lcm_nat_def zdiv_int
|
huffman@45692
|
1239 |
of_nat_mult gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@31704
|
1240 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1241 |
lemma prod_gcd_lcm_nat: "(m::nat) * n = gcd m n * lcm m n"
|
huffman@31704
|
1242 |
unfolding lcm_nat_def
|
nipkow@31952
|
1243 |
by (simp add: dvd_mult_div_cancel [OF gcd_dvd_prod_nat])
|
huffman@31704
|
1244 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1245 |
lemma prod_gcd_lcm_int: "abs(m::int) * abs n = gcd m n * lcm m n"
|
huffman@31704
|
1246 |
unfolding lcm_int_def gcd_int_def
|
huffman@31704
|
1247 |
apply (subst int_mult [symmetric])
|
nipkow@31952
|
1248 |
apply (subst prod_gcd_lcm_nat [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
1249 |
apply (subst nat_abs_mult_distrib [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
1250 |
apply (simp, simp add: abs_mult)
|
huffman@31704
|
1251 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1252 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1253 |
lemma lcm_0_nat [simp]: "lcm (m::nat) 0 = 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
1254 |
unfolding lcm_nat_def by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
1255 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1256 |
lemma lcm_0_int [simp]: "lcm (m::int) 0 = 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
1257 |
unfolding lcm_int_def by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
1258 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1259 |
lemma lcm_0_left_nat [simp]: "lcm (0::nat) n = 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
1260 |
unfolding lcm_nat_def by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
1261 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1262 |
lemma lcm_0_left_int [simp]: "lcm (0::int) n = 0"
|
huffman@31704
|
1263 |
unfolding lcm_int_def by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
1264 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1265 |
lemma lcm_pos_nat:
|
nipkow@31796
|
1266 |
"(m::nat) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> n>0 \<Longrightarrow> lcm m n > 0"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1267 |
by (metis gr0I mult_is_0 prod_gcd_lcm_nat)
|
chaieb@27669
|
1268 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1269 |
lemma lcm_pos_int:
|
nipkow@31796
|
1270 |
"(m::int) ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> n ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> lcm m n > 0"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1271 |
apply (subst lcm_abs_int)
|
nipkow@31952
|
1272 |
apply (rule lcm_pos_nat [transferred])
|
nipkow@31796
|
1273 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1274 |
done
|
chaieb@27669
|
1275 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1276 |
lemma dvd_pos_nat:
|
haftmann@23687
|
1277 |
fixes n m :: nat
|
haftmann@23687
|
1278 |
assumes "n > 0" and "m dvd n"
|
haftmann@23687
|
1279 |
shows "m > 0"
|
haftmann@23687
|
1280 |
using assms by (cases m) auto
|
haftmann@23687
|
1281 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1282 |
lemma lcm_least_nat:
|
huffman@31704
|
1283 |
assumes "(m::nat) dvd k" and "n dvd k"
|
haftmann@27556
|
1284 |
shows "lcm m n dvd k"
|
haftmann@23687
|
1285 |
proof (cases k)
|
haftmann@23687
|
1286 |
case 0 then show ?thesis by auto
|
haftmann@23687
|
1287 |
next
|
haftmann@23687
|
1288 |
case (Suc _) then have pos_k: "k > 0" by auto
|
nipkow@31952
|
1289 |
from assms dvd_pos_nat [OF this] have pos_mn: "m > 0" "n > 0" by auto
|
nipkow@31952
|
1290 |
with gcd_zero_nat [of m n] have pos_gcd: "gcd m n > 0" by simp
|
haftmann@23687
|
1291 |
from assms obtain p where k_m: "k = m * p" using dvd_def by blast
|
haftmann@23687
|
1292 |
from assms obtain q where k_n: "k = n * q" using dvd_def by blast
|
haftmann@23687
|
1293 |
from pos_k k_m have pos_p: "p > 0" by auto
|
haftmann@23687
|
1294 |
from pos_k k_n have pos_q: "q > 0" by auto
|
haftmann@27556
|
1295 |
have "k * k * gcd q p = k * gcd (k * q) (k * p)"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1296 |
by (simp add: mult_ac gcd_mult_distrib_nat)
|
haftmann@27556
|
1297 |
also have "\<dots> = k * gcd (m * p * q) (n * q * p)"
|
haftmann@23687
|
1298 |
by (simp add: k_m [symmetric] k_n [symmetric])
|
haftmann@27556
|
1299 |
also have "\<dots> = k * p * q * gcd m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1300 |
by (simp add: mult_ac gcd_mult_distrib_nat)
|
haftmann@27556
|
1301 |
finally have "(m * p) * (n * q) * gcd q p = k * p * q * gcd m n"
|
haftmann@23687
|
1302 |
by (simp only: k_m [symmetric] k_n [symmetric])
|
haftmann@27556
|
1303 |
then have "p * q * m * n * gcd q p = p * q * k * gcd m n"
|
haftmann@23687
|
1304 |
by (simp add: mult_ac)
|
haftmann@27556
|
1305 |
with pos_p pos_q have "m * n * gcd q p = k * gcd m n"
|
haftmann@23687
|
1306 |
by simp
|
nipkow@31952
|
1307 |
with prod_gcd_lcm_nat [of m n]
|
haftmann@27556
|
1308 |
have "lcm m n * gcd q p * gcd m n = k * gcd m n"
|
haftmann@23687
|
1309 |
by (simp add: mult_ac)
|
huffman@31704
|
1310 |
with pos_gcd have "lcm m n * gcd q p = k" by auto
|
haftmann@23687
|
1311 |
then show ?thesis using dvd_def by auto
|
haftmann@23687
|
1312 |
qed
|
haftmann@23687
|
1313 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1314 |
lemma lcm_least_int:
|
nipkow@31796
|
1315 |
"(m::int) dvd k \<Longrightarrow> n dvd k \<Longrightarrow> lcm m n dvd k"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1316 |
apply (subst lcm_abs_int)
|
nipkow@31796
|
1317 |
apply (rule dvd_trans)
|
nipkow@31952
|
1318 |
apply (rule lcm_least_nat [transferred, of _ "abs k" _])
|
nipkow@31796
|
1319 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1320 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1321 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1322 |
lemma lcm_dvd1_nat: "(m::nat) dvd lcm m n"
|
haftmann@23687
|
1323 |
proof (cases m)
|
haftmann@23687
|
1324 |
case 0 then show ?thesis by simp
|
haftmann@23687
|
1325 |
next
|
haftmann@23687
|
1326 |
case (Suc _)
|
haftmann@23687
|
1327 |
then have mpos: "m > 0" by simp
|
haftmann@23687
|
1328 |
show ?thesis
|
haftmann@23687
|
1329 |
proof (cases n)
|
haftmann@23687
|
1330 |
case 0 then show ?thesis by simp
|
haftmann@23687
|
1331 |
next
|
haftmann@23687
|
1332 |
case (Suc _)
|
haftmann@23687
|
1333 |
then have npos: "n > 0" by simp
|
haftmann@27556
|
1334 |
have "gcd m n dvd n" by simp
|
haftmann@27556
|
1335 |
then obtain k where "n = gcd m n * k" using dvd_def by auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1336 |
then have "m * n div gcd m n = m * (gcd m n * k) div gcd m n"
|
huffman@31704
|
1337 |
by (simp add: mult_ac)
|
nipkow@31952
|
1338 |
also have "\<dots> = m * k" using mpos npos gcd_zero_nat by simp
|
huffman@31704
|
1339 |
finally show ?thesis by (simp add: lcm_nat_def)
|
haftmann@23687
|
1340 |
qed
|
haftmann@23687
|
1341 |
qed
|
haftmann@23687
|
1342 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1343 |
lemma lcm_dvd1_int: "(m::int) dvd lcm m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1344 |
apply (subst lcm_abs_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
1345 |
apply (rule dvd_trans)
|
huffman@31704
|
1346 |
prefer 2
|
nipkow@31952
|
1347 |
apply (rule lcm_dvd1_nat [transferred])
|
huffman@31704
|
1348 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1349 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1350 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1351 |
lemma lcm_dvd2_nat: "(n::nat) dvd lcm m n"
|
haftmann@35722
|
1352 |
using lcm_dvd1_nat [of n m] by (simp only: lcm_nat_def mult.commute gcd_nat.commute)
|
huffman@31704
|
1353 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1354 |
lemma lcm_dvd2_int: "(n::int) dvd lcm m n"
|
haftmann@35722
|
1355 |
using lcm_dvd1_int [of n m] by (simp only: lcm_int_def lcm_nat_def mult.commute gcd_nat.commute)
|
huffman@31704
|
1356 |
|
nipkow@31730
|
1357 |
lemma dvd_lcm_I1_nat[simp]: "(k::nat) dvd m \<Longrightarrow> k dvd lcm m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1358 |
by(metis lcm_dvd1_nat dvd_trans)
|
nipkow@31729
|
1359 |
|
nipkow@31730
|
1360 |
lemma dvd_lcm_I2_nat[simp]: "(k::nat) dvd n \<Longrightarrow> k dvd lcm m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1361 |
by(metis lcm_dvd2_nat dvd_trans)
|
nipkow@31729
|
1362 |
|
nipkow@31730
|
1363 |
lemma dvd_lcm_I1_int[simp]: "(i::int) dvd m \<Longrightarrow> i dvd lcm m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1364 |
by(metis lcm_dvd1_int dvd_trans)
|
nipkow@31729
|
1365 |
|
nipkow@31730
|
1366 |
lemma dvd_lcm_I2_int[simp]: "(i::int) dvd n \<Longrightarrow> i dvd lcm m n"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1367 |
by(metis lcm_dvd2_int dvd_trans)
|
nipkow@31729
|
1368 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1369 |
lemma lcm_unique_nat: "(a::nat) dvd d \<and> b dvd d \<and>
|
huffman@31704
|
1370 |
(\<forall>e. a dvd e \<and> b dvd e \<longrightarrow> d dvd e) \<longleftrightarrow> d = lcm a b"
|
nipkow@33657
|
1371 |
by (auto intro: dvd_antisym lcm_least_nat lcm_dvd1_nat lcm_dvd2_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
1372 |
|
nipkow@31952
|
1373 |
lemma lcm_unique_int: "d >= 0 \<and> (a::int) dvd d \<and> b dvd d \<and>
|
huffman@31704
|
1374 |
(\<forall>e. a dvd e \<and> b dvd e \<longrightarrow> d dvd e) \<longleftrightarrow> d = lcm a b"
|
nipkow@33657
|
1375 |
by (auto intro: dvd_antisym [transferred] lcm_least_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
1376 |
|
haftmann@37770
|
1377 |
interpretation lcm_nat: abel_semigroup "lcm :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
|
haftmann@34960
|
1378 |
proof
|
haftmann@34960
|
1379 |
fix n m p :: nat
|
haftmann@34960
|
1380 |
show "lcm (lcm n m) p = lcm n (lcm m p)"
|
haftmann@34960
|
1381 |
by (rule lcm_unique_nat [THEN iffD1]) (metis dvd.order_trans lcm_unique_nat)
|
haftmann@34960
|
1382 |
show "lcm m n = lcm n m"
|
haftmann@36349
|
1383 |
by (simp add: lcm_nat_def gcd_commute_nat field_simps)
|
haftmann@34960
|
1384 |
qed
|
haftmann@34960
|
1385 |
|
haftmann@37770
|
1386 |
interpretation lcm_int: abel_semigroup "lcm :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
|
haftmann@34960
|
1387 |
proof
|
haftmann@34960
|
1388 |
fix n m p :: int
|
haftmann@34960
|
1389 |
show "lcm (lcm n m) p = lcm n (lcm m p)"
|
haftmann@34960
|
1390 |
by (rule lcm_unique_int [THEN iffD1]) (metis dvd_trans lcm_unique_int)
|
haftmann@34960
|
1391 |
show "lcm m n = lcm n m"
|
haftmann@34960
|
1392 |
by (simp add: lcm_int_def lcm_nat.commute)
|
haftmann@34960
|
1393 |
qed
|
haftmann@34960
|
1394 |
|
haftmann@34960
|
1395 |
lemmas lcm_assoc_nat = lcm_nat.assoc
|
haftmann@34960
|
1396 |
lemmas lcm_commute_nat = lcm_nat.commute
|
haftmann@34960
|
1397 |
lemmas lcm_left_commute_nat = lcm_nat.left_commute
|
haftmann@34960
|
1398 |
lemmas lcm_assoc_int = lcm_int.assoc
|
haftmann@34960
|
1399 |
lemmas lcm_commute_int = lcm_int.commute
|
haftmann@34960
|
1400 |
lemmas lcm_left_commute_int = lcm_int.left_commute
|
haftmann@34960
|
1401 |
|
haftmann@34960
|
1402 |
lemmas lcm_ac_nat = lcm_assoc_nat lcm_commute_nat lcm_left_commute_nat
|
haftmann@34960
|
1403 |
lemmas lcm_ac_int = lcm_assoc_int lcm_commute_int lcm_left_commute_int
|
haftmann@34960
|
1404 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
1405 |
lemma lcm_proj2_if_dvd_nat [simp]: "(x::nat) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> lcm x y = y"
|
huffman@31704
|
1406 |
apply (rule sym)
|
nipkow@31952
|
1407 |
apply (subst lcm_unique_nat [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
1408 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1409 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1410 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
1411 |
lemma lcm_proj2_if_dvd_int [simp]: "(x::int) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> lcm x y = abs y"
|
huffman@31704
|
1412 |
apply (rule sym)
|
nipkow@31952
|
1413 |
apply (subst lcm_unique_int [symmetric])
|
huffman@31704
|
1414 |
apply auto
|
huffman@31704
|
1415 |
done
|
huffman@31704
|
1416 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
1417 |
lemma lcm_proj1_if_dvd_nat [simp]: "(x::nat) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> lcm y x = y"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1418 |
by (subst lcm_commute_nat, erule lcm_proj2_if_dvd_nat)
|
huffman@31704
|
1419 |
|
nipkow@31796
|
1420 |
lemma lcm_proj1_if_dvd_int [simp]: "(x::int) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> lcm y x = abs y"
|
nipkow@31952
|
1421 |
by (subst lcm_commute_int, erule lcm_proj2_if_dvd_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
1422 |
|
nipkow@31992
|
1423 |
lemma lcm_proj1_iff_nat[simp]: "lcm m n = (m::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> n dvd m"
|
nipkow@31992
|
1424 |
by (metis lcm_proj1_if_dvd_nat lcm_unique_nat)
|
nipkow@31992
|
1425 |
|
nipkow@31992
|
1426 |
lemma lcm_proj2_iff_nat[simp]: "lcm m n = (n::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> m dvd n"
|
nipkow@31992
|
1427 |
by (metis lcm_proj2_if_dvd_nat lcm_unique_nat)
|
nipkow@31992
|
1428 |
|
nipkow@31992
|
1429 |
lemma lcm_proj1_iff_int[simp]: "lcm m n = abs(m::int) \<longleftrightarrow> n dvd m"
|
nipkow@31992
|
1430 |
by (metis dvd_abs_iff lcm_proj1_if_dvd_int lcm_unique_int)
|
nipkow@31992
|
1431 |
|
nipkow@31992
|
1432 |
lemma lcm_proj2_iff_int[simp]: "lcm m n = abs(n::int) \<longleftrightarrow> m dvd n"
|
nipkow@31992
|
1433 |
by (metis dvd_abs_iff lcm_proj2_if_dvd_int lcm_unique_int)
|
huffman@31704
|
1434 |
|
haftmann@43740
|
1435 |
lemma comp_fun_idem_gcd_nat: "comp_fun_idem (gcd :: nat\<Rightarrow>nat\<Rightarrow>nat)"
|
nipkow@31992
|
1436 |
proof qed (auto simp add: gcd_ac_nat)
|
nipkow@31992
|
1437 |
|
haftmann@43740
|
1438 |
lemma comp_fun_idem_gcd_int: "comp_fun_idem (gcd :: int\<Rightarrow>int\<Rightarrow>int)"
|
nipkow@31992
|
1439 |
proof qed (auto simp add: gcd_ac_int)
|
nipkow@31992
|
1440 |
|
haftmann@43740
|
1441 |
lemma comp_fun_idem_lcm_nat: "comp_fun_idem (lcm :: nat\<Rightarrow>nat\<Rightarrow>nat)"
|
nipkow@31992
|
1442 |
proof qed (auto simp add: lcm_ac_nat)
|
nipkow@31992
|
1443 |
|
haftmann@43740
|
1444 |
lemma comp_fun_idem_lcm_int: "comp_fun_idem (lcm :: int\<Rightarrow>int\<Rightarrow>int)"
|
nipkow@31992
|
1445 |
proof qed (auto simp add: lcm_ac_int)
|
nipkow@31992
|
1446 |
|
huffman@31704
|
1447 |
|
nipkow@31995
|
1448 |
(* FIXME introduce selimattice_bot/top and derive the following lemmas in there: *)
|
nipkow@31995
|
1449 |
|
nipkow@31995
|
1450 |
lemma lcm_0_iff_nat[simp]: "lcm (m::nat) n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> m=0 \<or> n=0"
|
nipkow@31995
|
1451 |
by (metis lcm_0_left_nat lcm_0_nat mult_is_0 prod_gcd_lcm_nat)
|
nipkow@31995
|
1452 |
|
nipkow@31995
|
1453 |
lemma lcm_0_iff_int[simp]: "lcm (m::int) n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> m=0 \<or> n=0"
|
huffman@45637
|
1454 |
by (metis lcm_0_int lcm_0_left_int lcm_pos_int less_le)
|
nipkow@31995
|
1455 |
|
nipkow@31995
|
1456 |
lemma lcm_1_iff_nat[simp]: "lcm (m::nat) n = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> m=1 \<and> n=1"
|
nipkow@31995
|
1457 |
by (metis gcd_1_nat lcm_unique_nat nat_mult_1 prod_gcd_lcm_nat)
|
nipkow@31995
|
1458 |
|
nipkow@31995
|
1459 |
lemma lcm_1_iff_int[simp]: "lcm (m::int) n = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> (m=1 \<or> m = -1) \<and> (n=1 \<or> n = -1)"
|
berghofe@31996
|
1460 |
by (auto simp add: abs_mult_self trans [OF lcm_unique_int eq_commute, symmetric] zmult_eq_1_iff)
|
nipkow@31995
|
1461 |
|
haftmann@34028
|
1462 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1463 |
subsection {* The complete divisibility lattice *}
|
nipkow@32090
|
1464 |
|
krauss@45716
|
1465 |
interpretation gcd_semilattice_nat: semilattice_inf gcd "op dvd" "(%m n::nat. m dvd n & ~ n dvd m)"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1466 |
proof
|
nipkow@32090
|
1467 |
case goal3 thus ?case by(metis gcd_unique_nat)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1468 |
qed auto
|
nipkow@32090
|
1469 |
|
krauss@45716
|
1470 |
interpretation lcm_semilattice_nat: semilattice_sup lcm "op dvd" "(%m n::nat. m dvd n & ~ n dvd m)"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1471 |
proof
|
nipkow@32090
|
1472 |
case goal3 thus ?case by(metis lcm_unique_nat)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1473 |
qed auto
|
nipkow@32090
|
1474 |
|
krauss@45716
|
1475 |
interpretation gcd_lcm_lattice_nat: lattice gcd "op dvd" "(%m n::nat. m dvd n & ~ n dvd m)" lcm ..
|
nipkow@32090
|
1476 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1477 |
text{* Lifting gcd and lcm to sets (Gcd/Lcm).
|
huffman@46135
|
1478 |
Gcd is defined via Lcm to facilitate the proof that we have a complete lattice.
|
nipkow@32090
|
1479 |
*}
|
huffman@46135
|
1480 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1481 |
class Gcd = gcd +
|
huffman@46135
|
1482 |
fixes Gcd :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a"
|
huffman@46135
|
1483 |
fixes Lcm :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a"
|
huffman@46135
|
1484 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1485 |
instantiation nat :: Gcd
|
nipkow@32090
|
1486 |
begin
|
nipkow@32090
|
1487 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1488 |
definition
|
haftmann@46863
|
1489 |
"Lcm (M::nat set) = (if finite M then Finite_Set.fold lcm 1 M else 0)"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1490 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1491 |
definition
|
huffman@46135
|
1492 |
"Gcd (M::nat set) = Lcm {d. \<forall>m\<in>M. d dvd m}"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1493 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1494 |
instance ..
|
nipkow@32090
|
1495 |
end
|
nipkow@32090
|
1496 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1497 |
lemma dvd_Lcm_nat [simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1498 |
fixes M :: "nat set" assumes "m \<in> M" shows "m dvd Lcm M"
|
huffman@46135
|
1499 |
using lcm_semilattice_nat.sup_le_fold_sup[OF _ assms, of 1]
|
huffman@46135
|
1500 |
by (simp add: Lcm_nat_def)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1501 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1502 |
lemma Lcm_dvd_nat [simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1503 |
fixes M :: "nat set" assumes "\<forall>m\<in>M. m dvd n" shows "Lcm M dvd n"
|
huffman@46135
|
1504 |
proof (cases "n = 0")
|
huffman@46135
|
1505 |
assume "n \<noteq> 0"
|
huffman@46135
|
1506 |
hence "finite {d. d dvd n}" by (rule finite_divisors_nat)
|
huffman@46135
|
1507 |
moreover have "M \<subseteq> {d. d dvd n}" using assms by fast
|
huffman@46135
|
1508 |
ultimately have "finite M" by (rule rev_finite_subset)
|
huffman@46135
|
1509 |
thus ?thesis
|
huffman@46135
|
1510 |
using lcm_semilattice_nat.fold_sup_le_sup [OF _ assms, of 1]
|
huffman@46135
|
1511 |
by (simp add: Lcm_nat_def)
|
huffman@46135
|
1512 |
qed simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1513 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1514 |
interpretation gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat:
|
huffman@46135
|
1515 |
complete_lattice Gcd Lcm gcd "op dvd" "%m n::nat. m dvd n & ~ n dvd m" lcm 1 0
|
huffman@46135
|
1516 |
proof
|
huffman@46135
|
1517 |
case goal1 show ?case by simp
|
huffman@46135
|
1518 |
next
|
huffman@46135
|
1519 |
case goal2 show ?case by simp
|
huffman@46135
|
1520 |
next
|
huffman@46135
|
1521 |
case goal5 thus ?case by (rule dvd_Lcm_nat)
|
huffman@46135
|
1522 |
next
|
huffman@46135
|
1523 |
case goal6 thus ?case by simp
|
huffman@46135
|
1524 |
next
|
huffman@46135
|
1525 |
case goal3 thus ?case by (simp add: Gcd_nat_def)
|
huffman@46135
|
1526 |
next
|
huffman@46135
|
1527 |
case goal4 thus ?case by (simp add: Gcd_nat_def)
|
huffman@46135
|
1528 |
qed
|
huffman@46135
|
1529 |
(* bh: This interpretation generates many lemmas about
|
huffman@46135
|
1530 |
"complete_lattice.SUPR Lcm" and "complete_lattice.INFI Gcd".
|
huffman@46135
|
1531 |
Should we define binder versions of LCM and GCD to correspond
|
huffman@46135
|
1532 |
with these? *)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1533 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1534 |
lemma Lcm_empty_nat: "Lcm {} = (1::nat)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1535 |
by (fact gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat.Sup_empty) (* already simp *)
|
huffman@46135
|
1536 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1537 |
lemma Gcd_empty_nat: "Gcd {} = (0::nat)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1538 |
by (fact gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat.Inf_empty) (* already simp *)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1539 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1540 |
lemma Lcm_insert_nat [simp]:
|
nipkow@32090
|
1541 |
shows "Lcm (insert (n::nat) N) = lcm n (Lcm N)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1542 |
by (fact gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat.Sup_insert)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1543 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1544 |
lemma Gcd_insert_nat [simp]:
|
nipkow@32090
|
1545 |
shows "Gcd (insert (n::nat) N) = gcd n (Gcd N)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1546 |
by (fact gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat.Inf_insert)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1547 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1548 |
lemma Lcm0_iff[simp]: "finite (M::nat set) \<Longrightarrow> M \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> Lcm M = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> 0 : M"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1549 |
by(induct rule:finite_ne_induct) auto
|
nipkow@32090
|
1550 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1551 |
lemma Lcm_eq_0[simp]: "finite (M::nat set) \<Longrightarrow> 0 : M \<Longrightarrow> Lcm M = 0"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1552 |
by (metis Lcm0_iff empty_iff)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1553 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1554 |
lemma Gcd_dvd_nat [simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1555 |
fixes M :: "nat set"
|
huffman@46135
|
1556 |
assumes "m \<in> M" shows "Gcd M dvd m"
|
huffman@46135
|
1557 |
using assms by (fact gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat.Inf_lower)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1558 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1559 |
lemma dvd_Gcd_nat[simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1560 |
fixes M :: "nat set"
|
huffman@46135
|
1561 |
assumes "\<forall>m\<in>M. n dvd m" shows "n dvd Gcd M"
|
huffman@46135
|
1562 |
using assms by (simp only: gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat.Inf_greatest)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1563 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1564 |
text{* Alternative characterizations of Gcd: *}
|
nipkow@32090
|
1565 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1566 |
lemma Gcd_eq_Max: "finite(M::nat set) \<Longrightarrow> M \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<notin> M \<Longrightarrow> Gcd M = Max(\<Inter>m\<in>M. {d. d dvd m})"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1567 |
apply(rule antisym)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1568 |
apply(rule Max_ge)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1569 |
apply (metis all_not_in_conv finite_divisors_nat finite_INT)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1570 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1571 |
apply (rule Max_le_iff[THEN iffD2])
|
nipkow@32090
|
1572 |
apply (metis all_not_in_conv finite_divisors_nat finite_INT)
|
nipkow@45761
|
1573 |
apply fastforce
|
nipkow@32090
|
1574 |
apply clarsimp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1575 |
apply (metis Gcd_dvd_nat Max_in dvd_0_left dvd_Gcd_nat dvd_imp_le linorder_antisym_conv3 not_less0)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1576 |
done
|
nipkow@32090
|
1577 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1578 |
lemma Gcd_remove0_nat: "finite M \<Longrightarrow> Gcd M = Gcd (M - {0::nat})"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1579 |
apply(induct pred:finite)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1580 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1581 |
apply(case_tac "x=0")
|
nipkow@32090
|
1582 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1583 |
apply(subgoal_tac "insert x F - {0} = insert x (F - {0})")
|
nipkow@32090
|
1584 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1585 |
apply blast
|
nipkow@32090
|
1586 |
done
|
nipkow@32090
|
1587 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1588 |
lemma Lcm_in_lcm_closed_set_nat:
|
nipkow@32090
|
1589 |
"finite M \<Longrightarrow> M \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> ALL m n :: nat. m:M \<longrightarrow> n:M \<longrightarrow> lcm m n : M \<Longrightarrow> Lcm M : M"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1590 |
apply(induct rule:finite_linorder_min_induct)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1591 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1592 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1593 |
apply(subgoal_tac "ALL m n :: nat. m:A \<longrightarrow> n:A \<longrightarrow> lcm m n : A")
|
nipkow@32090
|
1594 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1595 |
apply(case_tac "A={}")
|
nipkow@32090
|
1596 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1597 |
apply simp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1598 |
apply (metis lcm_pos_nat lcm_unique_nat linorder_neq_iff nat_dvd_not_less not_less0)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1599 |
done
|
nipkow@32090
|
1600 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1601 |
lemma Lcm_eq_Max_nat:
|
nipkow@32090
|
1602 |
"finite M \<Longrightarrow> M \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<notin> M \<Longrightarrow> ALL m n :: nat. m:M \<longrightarrow> n:M \<longrightarrow> lcm m n : M \<Longrightarrow> Lcm M = Max M"
|
nipkow@32090
|
1603 |
apply(rule antisym)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1604 |
apply(rule Max_ge, assumption)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1605 |
apply(erule (2) Lcm_in_lcm_closed_set_nat)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1606 |
apply clarsimp
|
nipkow@32090
|
1607 |
apply (metis Lcm0_iff dvd_Lcm_nat dvd_imp_le neq0_conv)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1608 |
done
|
nipkow@32090
|
1609 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1610 |
lemma Lcm_set_nat [code_unfold]:
|
haftmann@46863
|
1611 |
"Lcm (set ns) = fold lcm ns (1::nat)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1612 |
by (fact gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat.Sup_set_fold)
|
nipkow@32090
|
1613 |
|
nipkow@32090
|
1614 |
lemma Gcd_set_nat [code_unfold]:
|
haftmann@46863
|
1615 |
"Gcd (set ns) = fold gcd ns (0::nat)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1616 |
by (fact gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat.Inf_set_fold)
|
nipkow@34218
|
1617 |
|
nipkow@34218
|
1618 |
lemma mult_inj_if_coprime_nat:
|
nipkow@34218
|
1619 |
"inj_on f A \<Longrightarrow> inj_on g B \<Longrightarrow> ALL a:A. ALL b:B. coprime (f a) (g b)
|
nipkow@34218
|
1620 |
\<Longrightarrow> inj_on (%(a,b). f a * g b::nat) (A \<times> B)"
|
nipkow@34218
|
1621 |
apply(auto simp add:inj_on_def)
|
huffman@35208
|
1622 |
apply (metis coprime_dvd_mult_iff_nat dvd.neq_le_trans dvd_triv_left)
|
nipkow@34219
|
1623 |
apply (metis gcd_semilattice_nat.inf_commute coprime_dvd_mult_iff_nat
|
nipkow@34219
|
1624 |
dvd.neq_le_trans dvd_triv_right mult_commute)
|
nipkow@34218
|
1625 |
done
|
nipkow@34218
|
1626 |
|
nipkow@34218
|
1627 |
text{* Nitpick: *}
|
nipkow@34218
|
1628 |
|
blanchet@42663
|
1629 |
lemma gcd_eq_nitpick_gcd [nitpick_unfold]: "gcd x y = Nitpick.nat_gcd x y"
|
blanchet@42663
|
1630 |
by (induct x y rule: nat_gcd.induct)
|
blanchet@42663
|
1631 |
(simp add: gcd_nat.simps Nitpick.nat_gcd.simps)
|
blanchet@33197
|
1632 |
|
blanchet@42663
|
1633 |
lemma lcm_eq_nitpick_lcm [nitpick_unfold]: "lcm x y = Nitpick.nat_lcm x y"
|
blanchet@33197
|
1634 |
by (simp only: lcm_nat_def Nitpick.nat_lcm_def gcd_eq_nitpick_gcd)
|
blanchet@33197
|
1635 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1636 |
subsubsection {* Setwise gcd and lcm for integers *}
|
huffman@46135
|
1637 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1638 |
instantiation int :: Gcd
|
huffman@46135
|
1639 |
begin
|
huffman@46135
|
1640 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1641 |
definition
|
huffman@46135
|
1642 |
"Lcm M = int (Lcm (nat ` abs ` M))"
|
huffman@46135
|
1643 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1644 |
definition
|
huffman@46135
|
1645 |
"Gcd M = int (Gcd (nat ` abs ` M))"
|
huffman@46135
|
1646 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1647 |
instance ..
|
wenzelm@21256
|
1648 |
end
|
huffman@46135
|
1649 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1650 |
lemma Lcm_empty_int [simp]: "Lcm {} = (1::int)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1651 |
by (simp add: Lcm_int_def)
|
huffman@46135
|
1652 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1653 |
lemma Gcd_empty_int [simp]: "Gcd {} = (0::int)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1654 |
by (simp add: Gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@46135
|
1655 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1656 |
lemma Lcm_insert_int [simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1657 |
shows "Lcm (insert (n::int) N) = lcm n (Lcm N)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1658 |
by (simp add: Lcm_int_def lcm_int_def)
|
huffman@46135
|
1659 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1660 |
lemma Gcd_insert_int [simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1661 |
shows "Gcd (insert (n::int) N) = gcd n (Gcd N)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1662 |
by (simp add: Gcd_int_def gcd_int_def)
|
huffman@46135
|
1663 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1664 |
lemma dvd_int_iff: "x dvd y \<longleftrightarrow> nat (abs x) dvd nat (abs y)"
|
huffman@46135
|
1665 |
by (simp add: zdvd_int)
|
huffman@46135
|
1666 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1667 |
lemma dvd_Lcm_int [simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1668 |
fixes M :: "int set" assumes "m \<in> M" shows "m dvd Lcm M"
|
huffman@46135
|
1669 |
using assms by (simp add: Lcm_int_def dvd_int_iff)
|
huffman@46135
|
1670 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1671 |
lemma Lcm_dvd_int [simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1672 |
fixes M :: "int set"
|
huffman@46135
|
1673 |
assumes "\<forall>m\<in>M. m dvd n" shows "Lcm M dvd n"
|
huffman@46135
|
1674 |
using assms by (simp add: Lcm_int_def dvd_int_iff)
|
huffman@46135
|
1675 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1676 |
lemma Gcd_dvd_int [simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1677 |
fixes M :: "int set"
|
huffman@46135
|
1678 |
assumes "m \<in> M" shows "Gcd M dvd m"
|
huffman@46135
|
1679 |
using assms by (simp add: Gcd_int_def dvd_int_iff)
|
huffman@46135
|
1680 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1681 |
lemma dvd_Gcd_int[simp]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1682 |
fixes M :: "int set"
|
huffman@46135
|
1683 |
assumes "\<forall>m\<in>M. n dvd m" shows "n dvd Gcd M"
|
huffman@46135
|
1684 |
using assms by (simp add: Gcd_int_def dvd_int_iff)
|
huffman@46135
|
1685 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1686 |
lemma Lcm_set_int [code_unfold]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1687 |
"Lcm (set xs) = foldl lcm (1::int) xs"
|
huffman@46135
|
1688 |
by (induct xs rule: rev_induct, simp_all add: lcm_commute_int)
|
huffman@46135
|
1689 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1690 |
lemma Gcd_set_int [code_unfold]:
|
huffman@46135
|
1691 |
"Gcd (set xs) = foldl gcd (0::int) xs"
|
huffman@46135
|
1692 |
by (induct xs rule: rev_induct, simp_all add: gcd_commute_int)
|
huffman@46135
|
1693 |
|
huffman@46135
|
1694 |
end
|